24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 6 of 11 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 10 11
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,344
B
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
B
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,344
Originally Posted by Pete E
Originally Posted by butchlambert1

I know the English Electric Lightening is a nice plane, but in reality it would run out of gas trying to attain the altitude of the U2.


Fuel consumption was always the weak point of the Lightening, but as an Interceptor, rate of climb and speed were seen to be more important. I think my the end of production later Marks could fly for 2 hours without refuelling, depending on how they were being flown of course.

Interestingly, they were one of the first aircraft of its type to be able to "supercruise"...

The quote below is some well cited information from Wiki and covers the trials with the U2.

"Climb

The Lightning possessed a remarkable climb rate. It was famous for its ability to rapidly rotate from take-off to climb almost vertically from the runway, though this did not yield the best time-to-altitude. The Lightning's trademark tail-stand manoeuvre exchanged airspeed for altitude; it could slow to near-stall speeds before commencing level flight. The Lightning’s optimum climb profile required the use of afterburners during takeoff. Immediately after takeoff, the nose would be lowered for rapid acceleration to 430 knots (800 km/h) IAS before initiating a climb, stabilising at 450 knots (830 km/h). This would yield a constant climb rate of approximately 20,000 ft/min (100 m/s).[36][nb 3] Around 13,000 ft (4,000 m) the Lightning would reach Mach 0.87 and maintain this speed until reaching the tropopause, 36,000 ft (11,000 m) on a standard day.[nb 4] If climbing further, pilots would accelerate to supersonic speed at the tropopause before resuming the climb.[16][36] A Lightning flying at optimum climb profile would reach 36,000 ft in under three minutes.[36]

The official ceiling of the Lightning was kept secret; low security RAF documents would often state in excess of 60,000 ft (18,000 m). In September 1962, Fighter Command organised interception trials on Lockheed U-2As at heights of around 60,000–65,000 ft (18,000–20,000 m), which were temporarily based at RAF Upper Heyford to monitor Soviet nuclear tests.[52][53][54] Climb techniques and flight profiles were developed to put the Lightning into a suitable attack position. To avoid risking the U-2, the Lightning was not permitted any closer than 5,000 ft (1,500 m) and could not fly in front of the U-2. For the intercepts, four Lightning F1As conducted eighteen solo sorties. The sorties proved that, under GCI, successful intercepts could be made at up to 65,000 ft. Due to sensitivity, details of these flights were deliberately avoided in the pilot log books.[55]

In 1984, during a NATO exercise, Flt Lt Mike Hale intercepted a U-2 at a height which they had previously been considered safe (thought to be 66,000 feet (20,000 m)). Records show that Hale also climbed to 88,000 ft (27,000 m) in his Lightning F.3 XR749. This was not sustained level flight but a ballistic climb, in which the pilot takes the aircraft to top speed and then puts the aircraft into a climb, exchanging speed for altitude. Hale also participated in time-to-height and acceleration trials against Lockheed F-104 Starfighters from Aalborg. He reports that the Lightnings won all races easily with the exception of the low-level supersonic acceleration, which was a "dead heat".[56] Lightning pilot and Chief Examiner Brian Carroll reported taking a Lightning F.53 up to 87,300 feet (26,600 m) over Saudi Arabia at which level "Earth curvature was visible and the sky was quite dark", noting that control-wise "[it was] on a knife edge".[57]

Brian Carroll compared the Lightning and the F-15C Eagle, having flown both aircraft, stating that: "Acceleration in both was impressive, you have all seen the Lightning leap away once brakes are released, the Eagle was almost as good, and climb speed was rapidly achieved. Takeoff roll is between 2,000 and 3,000 ft [610 and 910 m], depending upon military or maximum afterburner-powered takeoff. The Lightning was quicker off the ground, reaching 50 ft [15 m] height in a horizontal distance of 1,630 ft [500 m]". Chief Test Pilot for the Lightning Roland Beamont, who also flew most of the "Century series" US aircraft, stated his opinion that nothing at that time had the inherent stability, control and docile handling characteristics of the Lightning throughout the full flight envelope. The turn performance and buffet boundaries of the Lightning were well in advance of anything known to him.[58]"



Pete
Some of the Migs could also make a run at a U2, but like your Electric lightening the couldn't sustain the 65,000 feet. Now the U2's ceiling is quite a bit higher than 70,000 feet. I know what wiki says, but it ain't right on the U2s altitude capability. While it was like a kid running and jumping as high as he could reach, you fall down. That was the Migs and Electric Lightening. The U2 continued on at the altitude for many hours. The Electric Lightening is a good plane, but not trying to intercept the U2.
By the way, the old Canberras are still used for reconnaissance by the USA.

GB1

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 12,895
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 12,895
Originally Posted by butchlambert1
Originally Posted by Pete E
Originally Posted by butchlambert1

I know the English Electric Lightening is a nice plane, but in reality it would run out of gas trying to attain the altitude of the U2.


Fuel consumption was always the weak point of the Lightening, but as an Interceptor, rate of climb and speed were seen to be more important. I think my the end of production later Marks could fly for 2 hours without refuelling, depending on how they were being flown of course.

Interestingly, they were one of the first aircraft of its type to be able to "supercruise"...

The quote below is some well cited information from Wiki and covers the trials with the U2.

"Climb

The Lightning possessed a remarkable climb rate. It was famous for its ability to rapidly rotate from take-off to climb almost vertically from the runway, though this did not yield the best time-to-altitude. The Lightning's trademark tail-stand manoeuvre exchanged airspeed for altitude; it could slow to near-stall speeds before commencing level flight. The Lightning’s optimum climb profile required the use of afterburners during takeoff. Immediately after takeoff, the nose would be lowered for rapid acceleration to 430 knots (800 km/h) IAS before initiating a climb, stabilising at 450 knots (830 km/h). This would yield a constant climb rate of approximately 20,000 ft/min (100 m/s).[36][nb 3] Around 13,000 ft (4,000 m) the Lightning would reach Mach 0.87 and maintain this speed until reaching the tropopause, 36,000 ft (11,000 m) on a standard day.[nb 4] If climbing further, pilots would accelerate to supersonic speed at the tropopause before resuming the climb.[16][36] A Lightning flying at optimum climb profile would reach 36,000 ft in under three minutes.[36]

The official ceiling of the Lightning was kept secret; low security RAF documents would often state in excess of 60,000 ft (18,000 m). In September 1962, Fighter Command organised interception trials on Lockheed U-2As at heights of around 60,000–65,000 ft (18,000–20,000 m), which were temporarily based at RAF Upper Heyford to monitor Soviet nuclear tests.[52][53][54] Climb techniques and flight profiles were developed to put the Lightning into a suitable attack position. To avoid risking the U-2, the Lightning was not permitted any closer than 5,000 ft (1,500 m) and could not fly in front of the U-2. For the intercepts, four Lightning F1As conducted eighteen solo sorties. The sorties proved that, under GCI, successful intercepts could be made at up to 65,000 ft. Due to sensitivity, details of these flights were deliberately avoided in the pilot log books.[55]

In 1984, during a NATO exercise, Flt Lt Mike Hale intercepted a U-2 at a height which they had previously been considered safe (thought to be 66,000 feet (20,000 m)). Records show that Hale also climbed to 88,000 ft (27,000 m) in his Lightning F.3 XR749. This was not sustained level flight but a ballistic climb, in which the pilot takes the aircraft to top speed and then puts the aircraft into a climb, exchanging speed for altitude. Hale also participated in time-to-height and acceleration trials against Lockheed F-104 Starfighters from Aalborg. He reports that the Lightnings won all races easily with the exception of the low-level supersonic acceleration, which was a "dead heat".[56] Lightning pilot and Chief Examiner Brian Carroll reported taking a Lightning F.53 up to 87,300 feet (26,600 m) over Saudi Arabia at which level "Earth curvature was visible and the sky was quite dark", noting that control-wise "[it was] on a knife edge".[57]

Brian Carroll compared the Lightning and the F-15C Eagle, having flown both aircraft, stating that: "Acceleration in both was impressive, you have all seen the Lightning leap away once brakes are released, the Eagle was almost as good, and climb speed was rapidly achieved. Takeoff roll is between 2,000 and 3,000 ft [610 and 910 m], depending upon military or maximum afterburner-powered takeoff. The Lightning was quicker off the ground, reaching 50 ft [15 m] height in a horizontal distance of 1,630 ft [500 m]". Chief Test Pilot for the Lightning Roland Beamont, who also flew most of the "Century series" US aircraft, stated his opinion that nothing at that time had the inherent stability, control and docile handling characteristics of the Lightning throughout the full flight envelope. The turn performance and buffet boundaries of the Lightning were well in advance of anything known to him.[58]"



Pete
Some of the Migs could also make a run at a U2, but like your Electric lightening the couldn't sustain the 65,000 feet. Now the U2's ceiling is quite a bit higher than 70,000 feet. I know what wiki says, but it ain't right on the U2s altitude capability. While it was like a kid running and jumping as high as he could reach, you fall down. That was the Migs and Electric Lightening. The U2 continued on at the altitude for many hours. The Electric Lightening is a good plane, but not trying to intercept the U2.
By the way, the old Canberras are still used for reconnaissance by the USA.


If you read the article you will see the U2 was intercepted successfully a number of times by the Lightening. Could both planes fly higher? Sure..Given the Lightening could be pitched up to 87,000' I think sustained flight up to 70,000 or so wasn't unrealistic..

The real limiting factor for the interceptions would have been radar detection of the U2..

It was thought at the time that Soviet radars could not track anything above about 65, 000' so that may have been why that altitude was chosen for the trials? Plus the higher the U2 flew, the more dangerous it was, so perhaps the trials simply did not justify the added danger?

You mention the Canberra..that originally had a published operational ceiling of 48,000' to 50,000' depending on the Mark, but in 1957, the RAF managed to get one up to 70,000' and set a then world altitude record..Again, a big difference to an operational ceiling but still quite a feat for the day..

Prior to the U2 becoming online, the RAF flew a number of overflights of the Soviet Union in the Canberra, and in one case a plane sustained damage from enemy fire but managed to get back to friendly territory safely; sadly a taste of things to come with Powers..

Edited to add, the very first fatal U2 crash was with a RAF pilot at the controls and it was during training in the US. A handful of RAF pilots were trained to fly the U2 and did fly recce missions..

Apparently in some sort of legal/political gesture, before the flights commenced, legal ownership of the U2 was transferred to the British Government and it was then transferred back to the US on landing! I think British operational flights were stopped after the Powers incident, at least officially anyway..

Last edited by Pete E; 03/27/15.
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 7,866
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 7,866
To me, nothing has ever had as good of lines as the ole Falcon...

Such a lithe, little thing...

[Linked Image]


It ain't what you don't know that makes you an idiot...it's what you know for certain, that just ain't so...

Most people don't want to believe the truth~they want the truth to be what they believe.

Stupidity has no average...
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 7,866
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 7,866
Always liked the looks of some of the Saabs, as well. Kind of dig the canard thing...

[Linked Image]


It ain't what you don't know that makes you an idiot...it's what you know for certain, that just ain't so...

Most people don't want to believe the truth~they want the truth to be what they believe.

Stupidity has no average...
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 28,195
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 28,195
Originally Posted by sandcritter
Originally Posted by prm
Originally Posted by xxclaro
Originally Posted by prm

[Linked Image]


What is it?


F-14D Super Tomcat. Only 55 of this variant were produced.


+3. Granted it's an interceptor>fighter, and she's a big heavy bird, but brutish power and beautiful lines.


I saw an F-14 pilot once go inverted with a Russian Mig, don't tell me the Tomcat isn't a fighter.







IC B2

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,133
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,133
As a far as pretty fighters it's hard to beat the Grumman F-11F Tiger or the Hawker Hunter.

The EE Lighting was indeed a piece of work. I had a CO who had attended the RAF Empire Test pilot School as an Exchange officer. He did his graduation thesis and flight test on the Lightning. On that flight, they towed the jet to the end of the runway, he started, launched from Boscombe Down and went over the channel and accelerated to something over Mach 2 and slowed to subsonic and returned to Boscombe Down and landed with a low-fuel light. Total flight time? 13 minutes. eek

As far as favorites, while flying the the TA-4J in flight school was indeed a treat and certainly one life's great experiences but it's not a fighter. When it came to heading feet dry onto bad guy country I loved having Tomcats aboard. You knew with 2 Phoenix, 2 Sparrows and 2 Winders that they could start shooting at 50 miles and work their way in to protect you. Here's a scanned picture one of my escorts as we came off the tanker during Desert Storm. Make me fell all warm and fuzzy inside to have these guys aboard.

[Linked Image]


If something on the internet makes you angry the odds are you're being manipulated
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,748
P
prm Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
P
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,748
^^Nice pic of a 'Black Aces' jet. I wanted soooo bad for MiG-23 or -25 to come up and play. Had they tried their high speed, high altitude run on us they would have been VERY surprised at how far away we could shoot them with the Phoenix.

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,133
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,133
Here's another scanned one of that era. I sure wish we had digital back then vice my Nikon F4. I also was mailing film home from that cruise and four rolls went missing. I wish I had those shots!

With the two VF-84 birds I'm betting this was a TARPS escort mission.

[Linked Image]


If something on the internet makes you angry the odds are you're being manipulated
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121
S
Campfire Oracle
Offline
Campfire Oracle
S
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121
Evander Holyfield

[Linked Image]


"Dear Lord, save me from Your followers"
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,743
S
Seafire Offline OP
Campfire 'Bwana
OP Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,743
As mentioned above.... The Hawker Hunter I think was the best looking, cleanest lines of a fighter of British Manufacture...

[Linked Image]

Even tho the Phantom was mentioned quite a bit, along with the English Electric Lightning, no one mentioned RAF and RN Phantoms.

Instead of J 79s, they had Rolls Royce Spey Engines....

Thirsty, but they sure could get the Phantom up to altitude in a hurry....faster than American Phantoms...


IC B3

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,743
S
Seafire Offline OP
Campfire 'Bwana
OP Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,743
Here's a pic that will piss ya off....

[Linked Image]

A Phantom is service with the Iranian Air Force...

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,133
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,133
Worse maybe.... Iran was the only operator of the F-14 aside from the USN.

The real shame of course is what the mad mullahs have done to Iran. Only a matter of time until sanity returns but as bad as the Shah was the last almost 50 years have taken a country that has a whole lot going for it and destroyed it. I have co-worker who was stationed there as a USAF Major working on radar in the days of the Shah and it was a very different place.
[Linked Image]


If something on the internet makes you angry the odds are you're being manipulated
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 12,895
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 12,895
Originally Posted by Pugs
Worse maybe.... Iran was the only operator of the F-14 aside from the USN.

The real shame of course is what the mad mullahs have done to Iran. Only a matter of time until sanity returns but as bad as the Shah was the last almost 50 years have taken a country that has a whole lot going for it and destroyed it. I have co-worker who was stationed there as a USAF Major working on radar in the days of the Shah and it was a very different place.
[Linked Image]


IIRC correctly, wasn't Brit businessman arrested a few years back for trying to sell parts to the Iranians for their Tomcats?

It is a real shame about Iran; in the days of the Shah, they allowed access to airbases and all sorts of similar co-operation for the Wests overflights and general eves dropping on of the Soviet Union..


Last edited by Pete E; 03/29/15.
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,943
G
GF1 Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
G
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,943
Here's a pretty good trailer for a TV show about 13 years ago, 95th Fighter Squadron (home of Mr. Bones). Depicts the F-15 training program:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sakpDq6P4MA

And never insult Mr. F_cking Bones!

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,133
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,133
Originally Posted by GF1
And never insult Mr. F_cking Bones!


Fear the bones on a patch? Ha! You want bones VF-103 has Ensign Jack Ernie and has for a long time. They were with the Jolly Rogers with us in CVW-8 before the 84 become 103.

http://www.stripes.com/military-life/dead-man-flying-1.29418

“Skipper, remember me with the Jolly Rogers.”

Nearly 60 years after Ensign Jack Ernie was, according to Navy legend, shot down and killed during the 1945 battle of Okinawa, the aviator’s memory lives on in the F-14 Tomcat squadron that bears the unit’s original name and skull-and-crossbones insignia.

Fighter Squadron 103’s Jolly Rogers honor his last request by carrying Ernie’s skull and two crossed femurs in a glass case wherever they go, most recently on a Middle East deployment aboard the USS John F. Kennedy.

“He’s a full-time squadron member,” said Jolly Rogers aviator Lt. David Reade. “He’s on our flight schedule and our roster. He contributes a great deal to our successes and morale.”

Ernie’s family, squadron legend says, presented the skull and two femurs when his remains were recovered after the war. Squadron officers say they don’t know, however, what year that was.

The Jolly Rogers name has been carried by four fighter squadrons over the past 61 years, only coming to VF-103 in 1995.

Ernie, who was a Fighter Squadron 17 naval aviator during World War II, has deployed aboard dozens of carriers and to numerous air stations in his present service.

Tens of thousands of sailors know his story.

“Everybody knows about the bones of Jack Ernie,” Reade said.

“He’s been on board several carriers with us,” said the Jolly Rogers’ skipper, Cmdr. David Landess. “We did carrier qualifications on USS Ronald Reagan last year, and he’s gone on all the detachments we’ve had to Naval Air Station Key West (Fla.) and Naval Air Station Fallon (Nev.).”

Ernie is looked after by the squadron’s bones control officer.

“It’s kind of nice, but does bring a little pressure,” said the BCO, Lt. j.g. Matt Woo.

The BCO is always the newest pilot in rank and time in the squadron.

“It’s a right of passage for the junior pilot,” said Woo, who reported to the squadron in early June. “That’s the tradition, and Jack wouldn’t have it any other way.”

The advice given to Woo by the outgoing BCO?

“Basically, don’t lose the bones,” he said. “Also, don’t go into any dark parking lots by yourself.

“It’s an honor to carry his bones, but also a burden because of the theft attempts,” he explained. “You’re either the goat or a hero.”

Because the skull and crossbones draw so much attention, there have been many kidnapping attempts throughout Ernie’s long career.

“He’s highly sought after … by other squadrons,” said Landess. “There’s one or two strong attempts each year.

“I was successful in kidnapping him,” Landess said, explaining it was during a previous tour with a different squadron. “I’ve destroyed all the pictures since I’ve become the CO of this squadron.”

The Jolly Rogers name and skull-and-crossbones insignia were created by their first commanding officer, Lt. Cmdr. John Thomas Blackburn, in 1943. Blackburn is said to have made the decision partially based on the aircraft that they flew, the F4U Corsair, and partially on the off-duty reputation of early carrier pilots.

While most of Ernie’s time is spent in the squadron’s ready room, it’s not all work for him. He’s a regular guest at squadron functions, or out on overseas liberty — the Navy word for time spent ashore.

But don’t expect trouble from Ernie. Gone is the “work hard, play hard” mentality of those earlier carrier pilots.

“We’re a good group now,” said Reade, “not like the boys of long ago.”

That doesn’t mean Ernie won’t have a drink when he’s out in town.

“He has a shot on top of his box, in case he has the urge to drink,” Landess said.

“Jack Daniels,” Woo later clarified.

Ernie obviously draws a lot of attention when he’s off the ship.

“They want to know who would carry a human head in a box,” Woo said.

“You get a lot of stares,” said Reade. “It’s a good way to share … naval aviation with the rest of the world.”

People also see the lengths that the aviators will go to honor Navy tradition.

“It’s not morbid; it’s more of a morale thing,” Landess said. “He’s an icon. It’s a rallying point, a part of our long history that we’re proud of.”

Even with more than a half-century of sea duty, Ernie has never been promoted. “He enjoys his status as a junior officer,” Landess said. “If he had continued to promote, he’d have had to retire years ago. He wants to stay a JO.”

The Jolly Rogers’ current deployment will be their last in the F-14. VF-103 will be switching to the two-seat F/A-18F Super Hornet starting next year, but the Jolly Rogers name will follow them, as will Ernie.

“Ensign Ernie will be there,” said Landess, who recently made his 1,000th carrier landing. “He’s the most experienced aviator in the squadron.”

Historical details about Ernie’s World War II exploits are as sketchy as his recovery and return to the Jolly Rogers.

Cmdr. Jeremy Gillespie, director of the Naval Historical Center’s Warfare Division, said that his researchers can’t find any official information about Ernie — neither disproving nor proving — the squadron’s story.

Gillespie himself, however, remembers a different tale of the bones. While serving aboard the USS Theodore Roosevelt in the early 1990s, he remembers seeing the bones in the VF-84 Jolly Rogers’ ready room.

“The story that was told in the wardroom at the time was that the individual who donated the bones had been a squadron member,” Gillespie said from Washington, D.C., recently. “The guy knew he was dying [of cancer], so he willed two femur bones and his skull to have on display. They sure looked like real bones to me.”

“Whether there’s enough proof to believe it’s the individual [Ernie] or a cool drinking story, I don’t know,” he said.


If something on the internet makes you angry the odds are you're being manipulated
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,943
G
GF1 Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
G
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,943
Mr. Bones on a patch? Ha! He's full up, escorted everywhere by the junior officer in the squadron.

The Jolly Rogers history is a great one, as is the legacy of that squadron. And it was fun when they came to play, just before they disbanded and lost their Tomcats.

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,133
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,133
Originally Posted by GF1
Mr. Bones on a patch? Ha! He's full up, escorted everywhere by the junior officer in the squadron.

The Jolly Rogers history is a great one, as is the legacy of that squadron. And it was fun when they came to play, just before they disbanded and lost their Tomcats.


Jolly Rogers are still there. They just changed from VF-84 to VFA-103 and from Tomcats to F/A-18F's. Part of Air Wing 7.


If something on the internet makes you angry the odds are you're being manipulated
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,600
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,600
Originally Posted by T LEE
F4 Phantom

The F4 is a terrible fighter, to heavy and unmaneuverable. They didn't put guns on them until they starting losing a lot of them in air combat. It was outclassed by Migs.



[Linked Image from ]
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,600
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,600
Originally Posted by xxclaro
Originally Posted by prm
So many great fighters! I am a big fan of F-86s, and F-4s. When I was going to the USAF I wanted to fly F-16s or the A-10. Ended up going to the Navy and riding around in these. I can tell you it would accelerate when going near vertical. Getting turned and pointed back down when doing 1.5M approaching 50k' is interesting though. Awesome jet!

[Linked Image]


What is it?

F-14 or F-111 ?



[Linked Image from ]
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,856
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,856
F-111 wishes it looked half that good! grin

Page 6 of 11 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 10 11

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

572 members (160user, 10gaugemag, 10Glocks, 1337Fungi, 1234, 11point, 61 invisible), 3,002 guests, and 1,169 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,340
Posts18,468,711
Members73,928
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.128s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.9360 MB (Peak: 1.1295 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-25 19:58:27 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS