|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,074
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,074 |
Are 50mm scopes worth it?
Treestands don't demand. Treestands don't complain. Treestands simply ask me to sit down and listen.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,872
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,872 |
It depends on the quality of the optics. What scopes are you looking at ?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,921
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,921 |
A 40mm scope does exactly the same thing at 8X as a 50mm scope does at 10X. Above 9X or below about 6X or so they are equal. If you really need 5 more minutes of shooting time and plan on using the scope between 7X to 9X then they are a slight advantage. Assuming equal quality glass
There is more difference between quality scopes than 10mm of glass makes. A good quality 40mm scope will let you see well past legal shooting time, and longer than a lesser quality 50mm scope.
Most people don't really want the truth.
They just want constant reassurance that what they believe is the truth.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,468
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,468 |
Do you like high rings and mounts? Trouble clearing with bolt lift? I have not really noticed that big of a difference between 40mm and 50mm other than mounting issues. It's there, but more trouble getting that little bit more.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 29,626
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 29,626 |
Nope not even close for all the reasons cited above plus needless weight.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 11,951
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 11,951 |
I notice a lot of used 50mm scopes for sale. Says something to me.
I want my scopes as low to the bore as possible.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,285
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,285 |
EVERYBODY who knows ANYTHING knows 50mm suck. That's why they are selling, and every major scope manufactuer offers them, and even bigger 56mm are gaining popularity. Those big main tubes of 34mm offer nothing either. We all should be using 1" or even smaller tubes. Nobody's strong enough to carry a rifle that weighs an extra 10oz.
“You never need fear a man, no matter what his size. When danger threatens, call on me, and I will equalize.” Samuel Colt.
�Common sense is genius dressed up in work clothes.� - Ralph Waldo Emerson
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,615
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,615 |
Of the dozens of hunting scopes I use, the largest is 44mm. I have never had to pass a shot due to not having enough objective. I shot a boar in near total darkness a couple years ago with a mere 32mm Nikon. I may have been able to see him a little clearer with bigger glass but the end result was the same, sausage!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 15,648
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 15,648 |
I have several and for my deer hunting which includes food plots in deep woods, they work for me.
My elk rifle, on the other hand, has a 40 mm objective..
NRA Life,Endowment,Patron or Benefactor since '72.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972 |
A 40mm scope does exactly the same thing at 8X as a 50mm scope does at 10X. Above 9X or below about 6X or so they are equal. If you really need 5 more minutes of shooting time and plan on using the scope between 7X to 9X then they are a slight advantage. Assuming equal quality glass
There is more difference between quality scopes than 10mm of glass makes. A good quality 40mm scope will let you see well past legal shooting time, and longer than a lesser quality 50mm scope. I use to feel the same way and I still like my 36mm scopes but my 50mm 3-10 Kahles Helia CL on 3X is a lot brighter in low light than my 2-7X36 Kahles Helia CL on 2X. IMHO you just have to weigh the small amount of low light ability gained against the added size and weight. For folks with an exact limit of legal daylight I doubt the 50mm will help much. Our regulations just say until dark, which is rather dependent on one's perspective.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,153
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,153 |
The answer of course is "it depends"
It's kind of arguing with a democrat about gun control when discussing bigger objective scopes around here. There's a lot of misinformation and flat out bull propagated to try and make points. Stuff like "A 40mm scope does exactly the same thing at 8X as a 50mm scope does at 10X." for example. Others cite weight as a major factor then will go on to rave about a 17 oz. scope with a 40mm objective & condemn a 50mm leupold that weighs 14 ozs. There's the claim that they require high rings (most don't on normal sporters) and the inference that they somehow will interfere with bolt cycling. How that happens when the scope sits higher is beyond me.
Everything's a tradeoff. Sometimes they're "better" for the purpose and sometimes they're not, it just depends upon what you want.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900 |
In general I like something smaller,but one of the nicest hunks of glass I have owned was a Kahles 3.5-10X50 CL.As I recall it mounted on medium rings on a Classic FW 243 and was very nice around dark-thrity.Easy viewing after some other stuff had quit.
I'd still like something smaller in a BG scope but for stand hunting whitetails it seemed like a good tool to me.Brilliant optics.
The 280 Remington is overbore.
The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,639
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,639 |
Are 50mm scopes worth it? NO
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491 |
Nobody's strong enough to carry a rifle that weighs an extra 10oz. Like the extra weight is not related to the ginormous size……(Hint: it ain't simply about the weight; Leupold understood that making huge and mounting low meant something to some people when they 'mooned out' the lower portion of some objective lenses.)
Sometimes, the air you 'let in'matters less than the air you 'let out'.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,117
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,117 |
Are 50mm scopes worth it? Not to me on a rifle used for hunting. Too big and bulky.
Heaven has a wall, a gate and strict immigration policy.
Hell has open borders.
Let that sink in.....
I Live for Opening Day!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,285
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,285 |
This is just another rediculous arguement. Like which is better 30-06 or 270. One gun isn't perfect for everything any more than one scope is perfect for every situation.
I have used everything from 1.5x fixed to 25x variables and up to 50mm obj, they all have a place. Small compact scopes won't do what the big heavy ones will. Big heavy guns are nobodys favorite to carry in the mountains.
When calling coyotes at night I could even see using a 56mm.
“You never need fear a man, no matter what his size. When danger threatens, call on me, and I will equalize.” Samuel Colt.
�Common sense is genius dressed up in work clothes.� - Ralph Waldo Emerson
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,566
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,566 |
The largest objective in my inventory is 36mm and the smallest is 32mm, which are both Leupold VX-3 scopes.
The only scope that I found to be lacking at dawn and dusk in the deep woods was a Leupold Vari-XII, 2-7X, 28mm.
I don't know, but think that the human eye cannot process the benefits of a 50mm objective lens. I think I read somewhere, years ago that it was actually a bit over or under 40mm???
PA Bear Hunter, NRA Benefactor Member
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,463
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,463 |
I only own one. A Bushnell 4200 2.5-10x50. It's very long and heavy.
It's on my "Barn Rifle". I don't carry it very far.It goes from my truck to a derelict barn that I use as a deer stand where I overlook pasture. Most of the shots at deer come right at sunset where I appreciate the 50mm objective.
I can't imagine having a 50mm on any other kind of rifle. I see them as a specialized application kind of affair.
Dan
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,485
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,485 |
I've never been a big fan of large objectives on hunting scopes but I got a great deal on a Conquest from Cameraland 3-9x50 with the Z600 reticle and have to say it really is a nicer picture than my old favorite 3-9x40 with what I think is the same glass.
The disadvantages of the bigger objectives have been discussed a little here but they have been around for a long time so they aren't show stoppers. I wouldn't put one on a lightweight mountain rifle but a standard weight long range thumper or varmint rifle would seem a good fit.
In general the cost difference doesn't seem warranted for most scopes, with the busy reticles there does seem to be some benefit.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 5,455
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 5,455 |
I have several in both 40 and 50 in the same brand and quality. If I had to do it again I would stick with the 40s. In particular my 40 and 50 mm Swaros don't seem to handle much different on the same rifle which currntly is model 700 xcr ii. Never had the lueys on the same rifle so I cant say.
Life can be rough on us dreamers.
|
|
|
|
618 members (10gaugeman, 12344mag, 10ring1, 1337Fungi, 1941USMC, 16penny, 56 invisible),
2,671
guests, and
1,131
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,308
Posts18,468,178
Members73,928
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|