|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,308
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,308 |
Is Magnum fill a must for this round or will standard fill hold up?
Buy once, cry once.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,002
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,002 |
Their recommendation to me was for magnum fill on my 375 Ruger.
I'd rather be a free man in my grave, than living as a puppet or a slave....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,308
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,308 |
Buy once, cry once.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,921
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,921 |
I would go standard fill. Magnum fill stocks feel like a concrete block.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,739
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,739 |
I have std. fill in both Micky and Borden-Rimrock stocks on P-64 Mod. 70s in .375H&H and have never had the smallest problem with them, or, the Browns, Mickys and Rimrocks on my P-64 .338s, also with std. fill.
I actually went with a Micky Edge MKX handle on my first original factory Brno ZG-47 in 9,3x62 and with the outstanding full bedding by Jan Kolenbrander, formerly of Martini Gunmakers, it shoots like a target rifle and is easy to pack around in BC mountain terrain.....NO issues, thus far and I seriously doubt that any will ever arise.
While, we all want the most rugged and toughest rifles we can obtain, there is a little matter of weight and, those who parrot the old bromide, "lose a little off your butt", are not always very experienced in packing a rifle, all day, every day in rugged mountain conditions.
So, I agree, the "heavy fill" is good for "elephant guns" and not needed for .375s, YMMV, of course.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,760
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,760 |
I'd check with McMillan and their fill weight policy, but I do not believe you have any choice of using a standard fill with a 375 Ruger, I'm pretty sure that they only make those stocks with magnum fill in the action area.
�I've never met a genius. A genius to me is someone who does well at something he hates. Anybody can do well at something he loves -- it's just a question of finding the subject.�
- Clint Eastwood
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,103
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,103 |
McM says magnum fill for the 375 R; gave no other options.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,758
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,758 |
I went with mag fill on this .375 Ruger. If you choose a slim stock design (that will fit the barrel contour) you can still keep it fairly light. From my understanding the mag fill is only in the action area so it isn't that much heavier (depending on stock design). This turned out right around 8lbs scoped...I think it would have been lighter but the dark earth stock color added several ounces of ugly:
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277 |
I would go standard fill. Magnum fill stocks feel like a concrete block. Big time! Side note, on my 338 WSM I have a Hunter Edge fill compact. Dober
"True respect starts with the way you treat others, and it is earned over a lifetime of demonstrating kindness, honor and dignity"....Tony Dungy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,578
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,578 |
The issue may be the the under-sized recoil lug on the M77. Standard fill may not be strong enough.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 721
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 721 |
I ordered a mcwoody classic for my 375 ruger alaskan. Looking forward to ditching the rubber hogue.
|
|
|
|
575 members (160user, 10gaugemag, 10Glocks, 1337Fungi, 1234, 11point, 61 invisible),
3,018
guests, and
1,181
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,340
Posts18,468,711
Members73,928
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|