24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1
R
New Member
OP Offline
New Member
R
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1
I've lurked around these forums a bit and finally have a bit of relevant information that some may find useful.

I had searched the interweb in search of some reloading data for the 375 H&H pushing the 250g Barnes TTSX with very little to no information. This weekend I finally got some ammo crammed together and out to the range for some testing.

After getting this gun early this year I was determined to find an accurate load that should cover just about anything from Deer to Elk to Bear.. I figured that the 250 grain Barnes with it's boat-tail design and Ballistic tip with a BC of .424 would make a nice flat shooting round.

I read a few articles about people not having good luck with some of the Barnes bullets and others where they shot great for them. Some of the better advice (as it turns out) was that the Barnes bullets are very sensitive to copper fouling, I had some symptoms of this with some other rounds so I Decided to get some of the Barnes bore cleaner and give the gun a good once over.. Wow.. at a glance the bore looked clean, after running a patch down the barrel it came out nearly cobalt (Blue) .. so following the instructions on the back of the bottle I finally got the barrel Very Very clean.

I loaded up 5 rounds to test the accuracy and check for signs of over-pressure and headed to the range the next morning (along with some 235 grain Barnes)

The Gun was originally sighted in at 200 yards with 270grain loads, so these were expected to hit high, the previous 3 235 grain shots are above this picture, and the 5th 250 grain was fired at the same POI to compare elevation, I then adjusted to fire at the bottom of the bulls-eye and finished the last 4 rounds to get a group

Gun: CZ-550
Scope: Leupold 3x9
Cal: .375 H&H
Bullet: Barnes 250 Grain TTSX
Case: Remington (New Brass)
Powder: RL-15 - 76.5 Grains
Primer: Fed GM215M
OAL: 3.60
Velocity: (unknown at this point) est 2900
Temp: 75
Wind: 2mph (ish)
Range: 100 yards
[Linked Image]

Pictured above is a 4 shot group (can be covered with a nickle) .. I can get a measurement if anyone really needs it

I have full confidence in these bullets and this gun

I consider this "Done" .. I went home and loaded up 25 more rounds and will continue pushing this out to longer ranges getting ready for Elk Season (drawn this year!) .. I'm confident I can put an elk on the ground if I do my part.




Last edited by RidingBlind; 04/24/12.
GB1

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,362
A
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
A
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,362
78 grains in my .375 Wby so, yep, you're there. Good job!

Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,513
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,513
Strong 1st post! Great shooting'!!

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,858
A
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
A
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,858
Welcome to the 'fire and thanks for the info....I bought some of the 250 ttsx at the Barnes booth at SCI and I have not had a chance to load them yet....was thinking of starting at 75gr Rl 15 which is my pet load for the 270 tsx.....now I think I will start out by trying your load....nice shooting!... good luck on the elk hunt too

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,063
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,063
RidingBlind thanks for the info, real curious about this bullet and the 375's. I think it would be a great combo, let us know when you chronograph the load.


JOC was right. The 270 Winchester on a Model 70 is a great combination as is the 30/06 and 375 H&H

IC B2

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 610
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 610
I'll dig this one up to ask for more information on this bullet's performance in the H&H.

I have a Kodiak hunt coming up and am currently set up with 300gr Accubonds going ~2450fps.

Would it be worth while to change to a Barnes 250gr TTSX or 270grn TSX? Would these options have more penetration than the 300gr AB?


If you are going to be dumb - you've got to be tuff.
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,796
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,796
Originally Posted by RidingBlind
I've lurked around these forums a bit and finally have a bit of relevant information that some may find useful.

I had searched the interweb in search of some reloading data for the 375 H&H pushing the 250g Barnes TTSX with very little to no information. This weekend I finally got some ammo crammed together and out to the range for some testing.

After getting this gun early this year I was determined to find an accurate load that should cover just about anything from Deer to Elk to Bear.. I figured that the 250 grain Barnes with it's boat-tail design and Ballistic tip with a BC of .424 would make a nice flat shooting round.

I read a few articles about people not having good luck with some of the Barnes bullets and others where they shot great for them. Some of the better advice (as it turns out) was that the Barnes bullets are very sensitive to copper fouling, I had some symptoms of this with some other rounds so I Decided to get some of the Barnes bore cleaner and give the gun a good once over.. Wow.. at a glance the bore looked clean, after running a patch down the barrel it came out nearly cobalt (Blue) .. so following the instructions on the back of the bottle I finally got the barrel Very Very clean.

I loaded up 5 rounds to test the accuracy and check for signs of over-pressure and headed to the range the next morning (along with some 235 grain Barnes)

The Gun was originally sighted in at 200 yards with 270grain loads, so these were expected to hit high, the previous 3 235 grain shots are above this picture, and the 5th 250 grain was fired at the same POI to compare elevation, I then adjusted to fire at the bottom of the bulls-eye and finished the last 4 rounds to get a group

Gun: CZ-550
Scope: Leupold 3x9
Cal: .375 H&H
Bullet: Barnes 250 Grain TTSX
Case: Remington (New Brass)
Powder: RL-15 - 76.5 Grains
Primer: Fed GM215M
OAL: 3.60
Velocity: (unknown at this point) est 2900
Temp: 75
Wind: 2mph (ish)
Range: 100 yards
[Linked Image]

Pictured above is a 4 shot group (can be covered with a nickle) .. I can get a measurement if anyone really needs it

I have full confidence in these bullets and this gun

I consider this "Done" .. I went home and loaded up 25 more rounds and will continue pushing this out to longer ranges getting ready for Elk Season (drawn this year!) .. I'm confident I can put an elk on the ground if I do my part.



Great shooting. Heavy hitters don't affect your aim. Welcome to the fire.


It is better to be judged by 12 than to be carried by 6.
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,023
D
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,023
Originally Posted by EricM
Strong 1st post! Great shooting'!!

+1

And welcome to the Fire.

DF

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,173
G
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
G
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,173
Original post on this thread is from 2012, and is the first and last post by that fellow; "RidingBlind".

SpartanGunner brought the old thread back to life with his question about 300 gr Accubonds vs Barnes 250 or 270 gr bullets. I have no experience with any of his three bullets... So I'll wisely defer.

Regards, Guy


Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,023
D
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,023
Just checked latest Barnes load data.

They now show the 250 gr. TTSX, B.C. of .424, accy load/max 73.7 gr, Varget, compressed, at 2,821 fps.

Their other load/max is 76.7 gr, RL-15, also compressed, at 2,863 fps, 24" Krieger bbl.

My .375 is 21", so maybe around 2,800, plus or minus.

RL-15 has forever been the go to powder, I was surprised to see Varget taking the lead with accuracy.

DF

IC B3

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,660
E
EdM Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
E
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,660
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
Just checked latest Barnes load data.

They now show the 250 gr. TTSX, B.C. of .424, accy load/max 73.7 gr, Varget, compressed, at 2,821 fps.

Their other load/max is 76.7 gr, RL-15, also compressed, at 2,863 fps, 24" Krieger bbl.

My .375 is 21", so maybe around 2,800, plus or minus.

RL-15 has forever been the go to powder, I was surprised to see Varget taking the lead with accuracy.

DF


And only with that bullet.


Conduct is the best proof of character.
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 785
A
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
A
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 785
Can't speak to the 250, but as I remember Kodiak is mostly close in hunting, unless your shooting on a specific bait station, or boat. So any 375 bullet weight will work, really with this caliber shot placement is going to the thing not bullet weight. I usually just go for most accurate bullet/load and adjust my hunting for ballistics.

Last edited by aguyinAK; 03/04/17.

Three most useless things to a pilot are:
1. The altitude above you
2. The runway behind you
3. The fuel on the ground
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,023
D
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,023
Originally Posted by EdM
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
Just checked latest Barnes load data.

They now show the 250 gr. TTSX, B.C. of .424, accy load/max 73.7 gr, Varget, compressed, at 2,821 fps.

Their other load/max is 76.7 gr, RL-15, also compressed, at 2,863 fps, 24" Krieger bbl.

My .375 is 21", so maybe around 2,800, plus or minus.

RL-15 has forever been the go to powder, I was surprised to see Varget taking the lead with accuracy.

DF


And only with that bullet.

Even so, I'll probably stick with RL-15, not "waste" Varget on a big, hungry round like the .375 H&H... smile

My Varget is earmarked for higher and better uses, have plenty of RL-15 to burn.

DF

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,660
E
EdM Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
E
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,660
Yep, my 375 sees RL-15 and the 270 gr TSX exclusively. Varget is doing very well in my 348 Win.


Conduct is the best proof of character.
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,023
D
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,023
Originally Posted by EdM
Yep, my 375 sees RL-15 and the 270 gr TSX exclusively. Varget is doing very well in my 348 Win.

Ed, have you tried the 250 TTSX? I know the 270 TSX is a great bullet. It seems popular in Africa and on tough BG, almost has a cult following.

The 250 TTSX is sleeker, has better B.C.'s, shoots faster/flatter and one would think it's about as lethal as the 270 TSX.

Your thoughts.

DF

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,002
B
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
B
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,002
RidingBlind,

FWIW, I shoot the 250 gr. Barnes TTSX in my .375 Ruger, and took it to Africa a couple of years ago for game ranging from Springbok to Sable. The only bullet recovered was this one, from the shoulder of a Sable at about 200 yards. This bullet performed perfectly on everything I shot it with.

Velocity from my Ruger Hawkeye African is 2880 fps. Accuracy is sub-MOA.

[Linked Image]


I'd rather be a free man in my grave, than living as a puppet or a slave....
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,023
D
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,023
Thanks, Bighorn.

Looks like the 250 TTSX did everything you asked of it.

It has been said, the TTSX with tip and bigger HP opens faster and wider than the TSX with smaller HP and no tip. That may be more of an issue with smaller calibers, not as much with bigger ones.

But, mono'e being mono's, and from your testimony, probably not a lot of terminal performance difference on game.

And, the 250 TTSX has some ballistic advantage over the 270 TSX. The 270 has a head start and a loyal following. It will be interesting to see if the 250 makes any gains on the 270.

DF

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,478
M
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
M
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,478
I bought a .375H&H CZ550 last summer and have been experimenting with loads since.

I started with Reloader 15 because I use it with my Whelens and from what I've read here. I never found a combination that was really accurate, using about four different bullets . Then I tried H4895 and results were no better. Then to my surprise I went to IMR4350 which is kind of considered a slow burning powder for the .375, but I've gotten much better results.

With this load:

Hornady brass
Winchester magnum LR primers
79.0 grns IMR 4350
270 grn TSX
COL 3.578"

This past weekend I shot two consecutive three shot groups right at 5/8" with this load. The only disappointment is that I measured only 2511 fps (average). It was a sunny day and sometimes I get inconsistent results with my chronograph, so I need to check that again next time we get a cloudy day.

Last edited by McInnis; 03/06/17.
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,238
G
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
G
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,238
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
Thanks, Bighorn.

Looks like the 250 TTSX did everything you asked of it.

It has been said, the TTSX with tip and bigger HP opens faster and wider than the TSX with smaller HP and no tip. That may be more of an issue with smaller calibers, not as much with bigger ones.

But, mono'e being mono's, and from your testimony, probably not a lot of terminal performance difference on game.

And, the 250 TTSX has some ballistic advantage over the 270 TSX. The 270 has a head start and a loyal following. It will be interesting to see if the 250 makes any gains on the 270.

DF


Always knew you were a big bore speed freak! grin


Trump Won!
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,023
D
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,023
Originally Posted by gunner500
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
Thanks, Bighorn.

Looks like the 250 TTSX did everything you asked of it.

It has been said, the TTSX with tip and bigger HP opens faster and wider than the TSX with smaller HP and no tip. That may be more of an issue with smaller calibers, not as much with bigger ones.

But, mono'e being mono's, and from your testimony, probably not a lot of terminal performance difference on game.

And, the 250 TTSX has some ballistic advantage over the 270 TSX. The 270 has a head start and a loyal following. It will be interesting to see if the 250 makes any gains on the 270.

DF


Always knew you were a big bore speed freak! grin

😀

From you, gunner, that's a real compliment.

DF

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

614 members (12344mag, 007FJ, 1eyedmule, 10ring1, 160user, 10gaugemag, 58 invisible), 2,764 guests, and 1,245 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,190,573
Posts18,453,908
Members73,908
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.091s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.9019 MB (Peak: 1.0606 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-19 00:01:59 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS