24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,491
R
RinB Offline OP
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
R
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,491
I got a Ti bolt handle and an alloy guard bow from sources mentioned here. Saved 2oz. Cut barrel 24 to 22".. reduced 2oz more.
With 10 oz scope and Talley mounts...around 6#.

Last edited by RinB; 01/11/17.


“Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away”.
Antoine de Saint-Exupery. Posted by Brad.
GB1

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,263
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,263
I find zero need to make it lighter, but could find a need to make it slightly heavier, at least in barrel weight.


“Perfection is Achieved Not When There Is Nothing More to Add, But When There Is Nothing Left to Take Away” Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,491
R
RinB Offline OP
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
R
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,491
Brad, my plan, when I bought it, was to shoot the barrel out ASAP. I have lots of brass and practice bullets. Then I planned to install a 1-9 Kreiger that will add about 8-10 oz.
I took it to the range and with two factory loads it averaged .4" for 3. May have derailed my plan.
Gives me leeway to use a heavier scope, say 16 oz.
I do like the longer bolt handle.



“Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away”.
Antoine de Saint-Exupery. Posted by Brad.
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,831
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,831
Lightened my Kimber 270 down to 4 pounds 14 oz.

Cut 3" off the barrel (back to 21")
Bored it out to .338 bore diameter.
TI bolt
Aluminum trigger guard

So with a 17 oz VX-6 2-12x42 it's 6 pounds 2 oz.

I agree that lightening them up to justify in your mind a heavier scope.

Or you end up arguing about which scope to use because a weaver 6x is a 1/2 oz heavier than a leupold 6x. If weight of a rifle doesn't matter so much who cares how much a given rifle scope weighs right?

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,377
H
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
H
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,377
Yeah, it would be hard to mess with a rifle when it's shooting that well, enjoy.

IC B2

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,017
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,017
Originally Posted by handwerk
Yeah, it would be hard to mess with a rifle when it's shooting that well, enjoy.


^^^^^^^Sounds like an awesome rifle right now with it shooting that well... I'd be taking care of that one, shoot it and enjoy it. Hopefully the op won't have to change that barrel for a long time.... wink


Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.

BSA MAGA
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,017
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,017
Originally Posted by alaska_lanche
Lightened my Kimber 270 down to 4 pounds 14 oz.

Cut 3" off the barrel (back to 21")
Bored it out to .338 bore diameter.
TI bolt
Aluminum trigger guard

So with a 17 oz VX-6 2-12x42 it's 6 pounds 2 oz.

I agree that lightening them up to justify in your mind a heavier scope.

Or you end up arguing about which scope to use because a weaver 6x is a 1/2 oz heavier than a leupold 6x. If weight of a rifle doesn't matter so much who cares how much a given rifle scope weighs right?


To me, a heavier scope makes the rifle too top heavy: Adversely affecting balance...


Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.

BSA MAGA
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,219
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,219
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter


To me, a heavier scope makes the rifle too top heavy: Adversely affecting balance...


Me too. Especially on a rifle that's pretty light to begin with.


Casey


Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972
R
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
R
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter


To me, a heavier scope makes the rifle too top heavy: Adversely affecting balance...


Me too. Especially on a rifle that's pretty light to begin with.


Casey


It's never really bothered me,but I just shoot them,I don't juggle them.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,721
K
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
K
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,721
Haha good point. I wonder if those who don't like a 19oz scope on a light rifle have ever used one?....or just doesn't seem like it is a good idea?

I have 3-9ss on a 223 Montana and compact nxs on a fw 280AI in a edge. Both feel and balance just fine.



IC B3

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,263
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,263
I get it Rick. Sounds like a great rifle!

Here's mine with 22.5" bbl:

[Linked Image]


“Perfection is Achieved Not When There Is Nothing More to Add, But When There Is Nothing Left to Take Away” Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,352
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,352
Just curious, other than the extra cost, why wouldn't you whack an inch off the barrel shank and have it rechambered? Seems like a bigger weight reduction vs cutting of the other end? Don't have a dog in this fight, truly just curious.

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,073
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,073
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
Originally Posted by alaska_lanche
Lightened my Kimber 270 down to 4 pounds 14 oz.

Cut 3" off the barrel (back to 21")
Bored it out to .338 bore diameter.
TI bolt
Aluminum trigger guard

So with a 17 oz VX-6 2-12x42 it's 6 pounds 2 oz.

I agree that lightening them up to justify in your mind a heavier scope.

Or you end up arguing about which scope to use because a weaver 6x is a 1/2 oz heavier than a leupold 6x. If weight of a rifle doesn't matter so much who cares how much a given rifle scope weighs right?


To me, a heavier scope makes the rifle too top heavy: Adversely affecting balance...


Same here.

My BIL has a Mountain Ascent with a Zeiss Z5 on top. That rifle is far too top-heavy for my tastes.


24HCF in its entirety, is solely responsible for why my children do not have college funds, my mortgage isn't paid-off and why I will never retire early enough to enjoy the remainder of my life.





Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,263
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,263
Originally Posted by 30338
Just curious, other than the extra cost, why wouldn't you whack an inch off the barrel shank and have it rechambered? Seems like a bigger weight reduction vs cutting of the other end? Don't have a dog in this fight, truly just curious.


For me it's not about weight loss, but balance. 22.5" gives the exact amount of barrel forward the forearm as the 84M MT. Looks and feels "righter" than 24" to my eye, and gives the rifle the same OAL as the M70 LA FWT, which has always been a nicely balanced rifle in my hand. Also, cutting the shank back opens the stock up around the shank, which then needs bedding and possibly paint.


“Perfection is Achieved Not When There Is Nothing More to Add, But When There Is Nothing Left to Take Away” Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,489
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,489
The 84M and 84L lay and balance so nicely in the hand that I no longer use a sling on mine.....I guess one could call that a weight saving.

Heavy scopes mounted high I find cumbersome and distracting. When I mounted a 6x36 on my 84L, I used X-Low Talleys and found the bolt handle barely touching the scope so I took a bit off the shank of the TI bolt handle with my 1" belt sander.

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,491
R
RinB Offline OP
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
R
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,491
My favorite scope for a hunting rifle is the Leupold 3x9 Compact UL. I think they go about 10 oz. They are really tough. Mine survived my 7.5# 375 AI. (that thing found a new place to live).

Last edited by RinB; 01/12/17.


“Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away”.
Antoine de Saint-Exupery. Posted by Brad.
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,831
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,831
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
Originally Posted by alaska_lanche
Lightened my Kimber 270 down to 4 pounds 14 oz.

Cut 3" off the barrel (back to 21")
Bored it out to .338 bore diameter.
TI bolt
Aluminum trigger guard

So with a 17 oz VX-6 2-12x42 it's 6 pounds 2 oz.

I agree that lightening them up to justify in your mind a heavier scope.

Or you end up arguing about which scope to use because a weaver 6x is a 1/2 oz heavier than a leupold 6x. If weight of a rifle doesn't matter so much who cares how much a given rifle scope weighs right?


To me, a heavier scope makes the rifle too top heavy: Adversely affecting balance...


I originally mourned an 11.5 oz 3-9x40 on it and honestly can't tell you the difference in how it feels with the 5 oz difference in hand. Balance point seems the same. Aside from what the numbers tell me on the scale there would be no way for me to tell what is actually mounted on there between the two scopes while in hand so I opted for the scope with the wider power range especially since this is my brown bear rifle where I really find the 2x handy.

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,687
E
EdM Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
E
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,687
I swapped an Italian shotgun pad (1.5 oz IIRC), an aluminum trigger guard and a bit more paint on my 270 Montana. It balances beautifully for me and goes 6# 1 oz scoped, empty, sling-less.

[Linked Image]


Conduct is the best proof of character.
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,491
R
RinB Offline OP
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
R
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,491
Earlier post: why wouldn't you whack an inch off the barrel shank and have it rechambered?

If I did that, first I would send it to Greg Tannel to have the action "blueprinted".

At some point it is wise to leave really great alone.



“Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away”.
Antoine de Saint-Exupery. Posted by Brad.
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972
R
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
R
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972
Originally Posted by RinB
Earlier post: why wouldn't you whack an inch off the barrel shank and have it rechambered?

If I did that, first I would send it to Greg Tannel to have the action "blueprinted".

At some point it is wise to leave really great alone.


That's worthy of saying again.I bet more than a few rifle loonies have messed up accuracy on a great shooting rifle trying to make it even better.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

396 members (12344mag, 17CalFan, 160user, 10ring1, 163bc, 01Foreman400, 31 invisible), 2,640 guests, and 995 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,283
Posts18,467,796
Members73,928
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.103s Queries: 15 (0.002s) Memory: 0.8976 MB (Peak: 1.0512 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-25 11:42:36 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS