|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,697
Campfire 'Bwana
|
OP
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,697 |
So for those that have used the TTSX bullets, what is the most effective...
Light weight bullet and fast velocity...
or Heavy For Caliber and moderate velocity?
Was thinking of using in either a 260 or 7 x 57 for deer..
and for elk, the 7 x 57 or the 338/06....
experiences appreciated! thanks!
"Minus the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the Country" Marion Barry, Mayor of Wash DC
“Owning guns is not a right. If it were a right, it would be in the Constitution.” ~Alexandria Ocasio Cortez
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,374
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,374 |
I guess I've gone the route of using good-midweight TTSX's with a decent BC keeping the game I'm after in mind. Others have used them more than I...but so far I've loaded as such: .243 80g 7x57 140 30'06 150g & 168g 280 AI 150g 300 H&H 180 g 308 150g we haven't killed with all those loads, but what we've shot at animals has worked great.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,787
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,787 |
handwerk,
great minds think alike.
Seafire -
a 140 TTSX for the 7x57 and either 210 or 225 TTSX for the .338-06.
Personally, while I would take my 7x57 with a 140 TTSX elkhunting, I can hear your .338-06 calling for those 225s through my 'puter - and thats elk medicine.
Last edited by cmg; 05/14/10. Reason: ff
Member of the Merry Band of turdlike People.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,300
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,300 |
Seafire...whatever shoots best..my 7x57 likes the 160s....
Ingwe
"...the left considers you vermin, and they'll kill you given the chance..." Bristoe
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 20,379
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 20,379 |
They might "way overpenetrate", but the 100 gr. TTSX out of my .260 is going to kill some chit.
I replace valve cover gaskets every 50K, if they don't need them sooner...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,300
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,300 |
RL...it appears that they do....they went the whole way through everything Ive shot with them, then failed to fall on the ground just below the off side of the critters... Tends to make me think they were still going after penetration...thus " overpenetrating"... Prolly should scrap the whole TSX idea..... I heard the BCs on them suck too.... Ingwe
"...the left considers you vermin, and they'll kill you given the chance..." Bristoe
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,787
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,787 |
Ingwe, post your load, please. Wait, wait - that did not come out right... seeing it is you. What velocities are you getting with your 7x57 and 160 fps?
Member of the Merry Band of turdlike People.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,786
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,786 |
Rancho,
Out of curiosity what does your powder/load look like for the 100 TTSX in the .260 (I refuse to use the "post you're load" phrase) ?
I'm down to about 100 or so 120 TSX and I'm giving SERIOUS thought to switching to the 100 TTSX instead.
George
I'll apologize in advance for not responding right off. I'm out the door to a funeral but will return.
Last edited by NH K9; 05/14/10.
�Out of every one hundred men, ten shouldn't even be there, eighty are just targets, nine are the real fighters, and we are lucky to have them, for they make the battle. Ah, but the one, one is a warrior, and he will bring the others back.�
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,300
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,300 |
Ingwe, post your load, please. Wait, wait - that did not come out right... seeing it is you. What velocities are you getting with your 7x57 and 160 fps? 160 gr. TSX in front of 50 gr. H4831sc for 2650fps...and it kills all creatures great and small.... Ingwe
"...the left considers you vermin, and they'll kill you given the chance..." Bristoe
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,094
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,094 |
I'm reloading the TTSXs now but my experience had been with the TSX and was all good. I dropped from 300s to the 270-gr TSX in my 375; from 180s in my '06 to the 168/165s. I've taken about 15 head of game with them and recovered two, one out of a big burchells zebra and one that hit brush but stayed "on track" and killed a waterbuck, having gone through sideways. The rest ventilated their target on both sides and sailed on.
They've also been the most accurate bullet in these rifles.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,300
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,300 |
+1 on the accuracy, and Ive only got one rifle shooting the TTSXs...a .243...but boy, does it ever like them! Havent tried them in others, as Ive been so happy with my existing loads and the regular TSX... Ingwe
"...the left considers you vermin, and they'll kill you given the chance..." Bristoe
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,264
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,264 |
Yeah, light and fast is the route I've gone with TSXs and it hasn't been a problem. But I haven't gone super light either. 120 grains(Tipped) in the .264 at 3500 and 130 grains in the .270 WSM at 3300. Both of those have smashed through elk shoulders and kept going. For deer and antelope, I'd consider the real lightweights: 100 grain .264, 110 .270, 80 grain .257, etc.
"For some unfortunates, poisoned by city sidewalks ... the horn of the hunter never winds at all" Robert Ruark, The Horn of the Hunter
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,050
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,050 |
Anyone tryed the 150s in a 300 win?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,879
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,879 |
So for those that have used the TTSX bullets, what is the most effective...
Light weight bullet and fast velocity...
or Heavy For Caliber and moderate velocity?
Was thinking of using in either a 260 or 7 x 57 for deer..
and for elk, the 7 x 57 or the 338/06....
experiences appreciated! thanks! JeffO says that, ....they WAY overpenetrate on deer...
I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,185
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,185 |
I'm currently working on loading 160gr TTSX in my .338 Federal. I figure somewhere around 2850fps can't be a bad thing. As long as they shoot well in my Sako, I'm going to flame a couple does this year. My thoughts on TTSX, TSX is that they benefit from higher impact velocity. These would be the first animals I've shot with them.
CLB
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277 |
4 deer, take whatever shoots as it doesn't take much to get two holes on them.
But for elk, and this is just me I want two holes (OP) and so I'd go with the 140 (not the 120) in the 7X, and in the 338/06 I'd go with the 210.
Just the way I roll.
Dober
"True respect starts with the way you treat others, and it is earned over a lifetime of demonstrating kindness, honor and dignity"....Tony Dungy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,707
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,707 |
A little tangent here, but sort of on topic I guess...
Have the TTSX's shot any different than the TSX's for anyone. I've got a real good load worked up for my 7STW with the 150 TSX's at about 3400fps. I'm going to try the TTSX's for the little added BC benefit and potentially quicker/more reliable expansion.
I have some of the TTSX's loaded up with the same charges as the TSX's, but haven't made it to the range to see for myself yet. Just curious what others experiences have been.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,879
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,879 |
It's the same bullet except for the Tip
I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,407
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,407 |
I'd go with the 210 in the 338-06. I gave the 185 gr TSX a go in mine a few years ago. While the elk dropped at the shot (280 yards) the old slug took quite a beating.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,075
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,075 |
Yeah, light and fast is the route I've gone with TSXs and it hasn't been a problem. But I haven't gone super light either. 120 grains(Tipped) in the .264 at 3500 and 130 grains in the .270 WSM at 3300. Both of those have smashed through elk shoulders and kept going. For deer and antelope, I'd consider the real lightweights: 100 grain .264, 110 .270, 80 grain .257, etc. Barnes ahs released a 110gn TTSX in .284 caliber. I think that will be popular with the smaller case 7mm crowd. JW
When truth is ignored, it does not change an untruth from remaining a lie.
|
|
|
|
98 members (14idaho, 7mm_Loco, 6mmCreedmoor, 300_savage, 1_deuce, 13 invisible),
1,589
guests, and
793
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,190,599
Posts18,454,517
Members73,908
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|