I do not, but did buy an FN model 70 in 270 for a donor project, screwed up and shot the donor, as we've all read/heard here "DO NOT SHOOT THE DONOR!"
I worked up a load with RL-17 that ran 3550 fps from the 24" barrel and was dumbfounded to see it shoot 1/2" groups, was one of the hardest things I ever had to do when the time came to tear that rifle down for the original build idea.
I have that load data out in my reloading shop if you want it, give me a holla.
For a moment there, gunner, it sounded like you were coming out of the closet, brandishing a .270...
Glad you rescued that gun, converting it to a suitable round. You were tempted by 1/2" groups, but overcame...
Good man...
DF
LOL, I was mainly astounded with the velocity, THEN the accuracy, went ahead with the build so I could push a 25 cal 100 gr TTSX at the same 3550 fps [25-06 AI] using near 10 grs more RL-22 than I did RL-17 in the 270.
Yep it was my go to load with H4350 or Hunter when I needed to reach for a lead free load when trapped in California. It was amazingly effective when I started it at about 3375-3400fps and I have still never recovered one from even the biggest pigs. In various wet newspaper etc test it offered deeper penetration than a 150 partition.
It matched up nice with the 110 Vmax, ate the same powder loads and gave interchangeable points of impact to over 500 yards. Got ugly in the wind after that but was a lazer at reasonable distances. If I was not looking at longer shoots in ridiculous wind conditions out here I would still be running it.
Cartridge : .270 Win. (SAAMI) Bullet : .277, 110, Barnes 'TTSX'BT 27772 Useable Case Capaci: 61.797 grain H2O = 4.012 cm³ Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.340 inch = 84.84 mm Barrel Length : 22.0 inch = 558.8 mm Powder : IMR 4350
Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge, incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge. CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !
Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time % % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms
Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value: +Ba 97 55.00 3220 2533 61321 11770 98.8 0.976 ! Near Maximum ! Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value: -Ba 97 55.00 2865 2005 43232 10840 86.9 1.144