Any meaningful difference compared to 139 Scenar? Headed to CO for Mulies next week. Have the 147s and 139s shooting excellent.
Meaningful, probably not. Thus far I'd say the 139 seems like a harder bullet, but that's far from scientific. I'd be entirely happy with either in your case.
Thanks. Just saw this. I ended using the 139 Scenar on a Muley and it performed quite well. Below average shot, still resulted in a dead deer in short order. Small entrance, still a small hole in the top, back of first lung but a baseball-ish exit after taking out a rib. Couldn’t ask for more.
Edit: SBHooper, I did test a 139 Scenar and the 140 Partition into a test target of particle board and damp magazines. The 139 Scenar out penetrated the Partition, and all others including 127 LRX, 147 ELD, and 140 Berger. Data point of one. I do get the sense that the core material of the Scenar is more robust than the others.