Home
Easier that way to make the records conform with the narrative.

Twitter
That way they can whitewash the criminal records by race............no pun intended, and make it look like Blacks are committing LESS crimes than they actually are.
Or maybe make it look like Whites are committing more crimes , remember Wray, Biden and Garland are running the narrative that the Greatest Threat to our National Security is the White Right Wing .
Originally Posted by JamesJr
That way they can whitewash the criminal records by race............no pun intended, and make it look like Blacks are committing LESS crimes than they actually are.


Bingo. Give this man a prize.


There is an “Information War” going on and it’s being generated towards our youth and minorities.

RAS
Never Fly

Just look at the Names anyone with half a Brain knows White People don’t name their kids after some Twisted Aberration of Commercial Food Items..

F’ck All
Originally Posted by akrange
Never Fly

Just look at the Names anyone with half a Brain knows White People don’t name their kids after some Twisted Aberration of Commercial Food Items..

F’ck All
The statistical data base being manipulated will not list the names, only the race.
That is too easily debunked by checking the offender website.

I'll call BS on the Xweet.
Caucasians and hispanics are lumped together on the FBI crime statistics.
Originally Posted by FatCity67
That is too easily debunked by checking the offender website.

I'll call BS on the Xweet.

And you'd be wrong... it's been going on for years, and they always claim it's a 'clerical error', and yet it keeps happening and the records are never correctted. I've never seen a White person's criminal record that stated they were Black. But I've seen Asian, Black, Latino/Hispanics listed as Non-Hispanic, White.
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by akrange
Never Fly

Just look at the Names anyone with half a Brain knows White People don’t name their kids after some Twisted Aberration of Commercial Food Items..

F’ck All
The statistical data base being manipulated will not list the names, only the race.


Those Tricksters
I have my doubts.
During the mid 1800’s and possibly before or after, you were considered negro if you had 1/32 negro blood. They probably changed the definition so if you are less than half negro you are considered white. Changing the definition of crime to make it appear there is less crime. Changed the definition of a vaccine to include the Shanghai shivers shot. Changed the way they measure unemployment to skew the numbers. Changed the formula to measure inflation so it appears lower. Everything has been changed. All the monuments have been destroyed.
Almost like they want a white genocide.
That tranny beast thing that attempted to shoot up the church the other week was listed as white. It was far from white lol
Speaking of race and crime, I have an interesting observation. I was in my Sheriff’s Department to renew my Concealed Carry Permit. Sitting in the lobby waiting my turn, I was watching a TV on the wall scroll through the local wanted criminals. Almost all were Mexicans. Our county its share of white trash and black folks, so I was a bit surprised at what I was watching on the screen. I guess this is the new normal?
Originally Posted by steve4102
Or maybe make it look like Whites are committing more crimes , remember Wray, Biden and Garland are running the narrative that the Greatest Threat to our National Security is the White Right Wing .

Maybe they mean that we're the greatest threat to THEIR security.
PJ
That tranny mass shooter that had the child with her from a couple weeks ago was listed as white even they she was from south america and clearly hispanic.
Meanwhile, Europeans prior to modern times are now depicted as being Afreakin, Asian, Mexican, etc. Vikings now look like Uncle Rastus with dreadlocks and Queen Mary was a sheboon with a surly attitude and the village baker in Bordeaux looked like Bin Hao Ling.....
Try asking AI to show you a picture of a happy White family, or a happy White couple.
BS it is.

https://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/offender/sops/flyer.jsf?personId=2208

Google the Texas website referenced in the image and you find on the IFunny web page.
Originally Posted by FatCity67
That is too easily debunked by checking the offender website.

I'll call BS on the Xweet.

[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]

Wrong state.
Read my post once more. Your link no worky for me.
Originally Posted by Stickfight
Originally Posted by FatCity67
That is too easily debunked by checking the offender website.

I'll call BS on the Xweet.

[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]


[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Originally Posted by DigitalDan
Read my post once more. Your link no worky for me.

The link to the TX DPS website links as a YT video for whatever reason
Can ya'll not see the red text with the archive links? I checked TX DPS website, Willie Thomas is listed as White and so is Brian Lampkin.
These are saved copies of the TX DPS website... It's amazing how many people are adamant about things that they don't know, especially when it's easily verified.

louby innocent

jimmie clark

willie thomas

brian lampkin
Just like gender, one can identify as on wishes.
Originally Posted by DigitalDan
BS it is.

https://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/offender/sops/flyer.jsf?personId=2208

Google the Texas website referenced in the image and you find on the IFunny web page.

Doubts confirmed.
Originally Posted by DigitalDan
BS it is.

https://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/offender/sops/flyer.jsf?personId=2208

Google the Texas website referenced in the image and you find on the IFunny web page.

Can you be more clear about what you mean in regards to the TX DPS website?
Originally Posted by BuckHaggard
Originally Posted by DigitalDan
BS it is.

https://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/offender/sops/flyer.jsf?personId=2208

Google the Texas website referenced in the image and you find on the IFunny web page.

Doubts confirmed.

It won't hyperlink without showing as a broken YT video, but here's the actual pages if anyone wants to see the Truth.


HTML

https://publicsite.dps.texas.gov/SexOffenderRegistry/Search/Rapsheet?Sid=04253926

https://publicsite.dps.texas.gov/SexOffenderRegistry/Search/Rapsheet?Sid=17650525

https://publicsite.dps.texas.gov/SexOffenderRegistry/Search/Rapsheet?Sid=06001768


It looks like Louby Innocent's record was corrected recently, but the other three are still there.
Crime is crime....

Why should it be any difference on who committed it?

Skin color only matters, to the democRATS, since racism and race baiting is the corner stone of their overall platform.

They want to point out how the blacks are "Victims"... and Non Blacks are the tyrants, so the world needs the DemocRATS to be the saviors, hence justifying their existence.

The democRATic party are the ones with a platform of " legalizing drugs", "defund the police", or just get rid of the police, the party that makes Blacks committing crimes the Victims of the crime in the first place...

They are the common denominator in this problem in this nation... essentially making themselves the real criminal in the big picture of things.
We have quite a few Creoles of color and Mexican people in our area where I served as a game warden for 30 years. The Creoles were likely about 1/8 to 3/16 African black and were no darker complexioned than me. The Mexicans by and large were a mixture of Spanish and Indigenous. They were likewise about my complexion or a little darker. When I wrote a citation or a report that had a blank for race I just wrote White. No one ever complained. They were in fact part or mostly Caucasian and I certainly wasn’t going to call the Creoles Black. Hispanic is not a race so what do you call a mixed blood Latin American? What if you had to identify an Australian Aborigine. What would you write?
Serious question. How do you list race when someone is bi-racial. Based on looks you can easily tell that most are mixed race, but others may be mixed and could easily pass for a white person, others don't have any white features and appear as a black.

Just looking at him I would have never guessed Obama had a white mother. He chose to call himself black but could have just as easily claimed to be white. I guess it depends on what is more advantageous to you at the time.
Originally Posted by victoro
Caucasians and hispanics are lumped together on the FBI crime statistics.
Originally Posted by killerv
That tranny mass shooter that had the child with her from a couple weeks ago was listed as white even they she was from south america and clearly hispanic.

Hispanic is not a race. It is a culture, or an ethnicity. There is a big difference between ethnicity and race, though many are too blind to recognize such.

What race are the majority of present day natives of South and Central America, or the historical residents of 1820 Arizona, New Mexico, California, and Texas?

They are and have been various blends of indigenous Native Americans crossed with Europeans. They can as easily be described as Caucasion as they can be called Native American.

Don't blame me. Blame the Spanish conquistadors who purposely left their women at home when they came to America with the purpose of breeding the native population out of existence.
That will go well when the a on goes out....
I was licensed by the United States Coast Guard in 1972 at age twenty as a Seaman in the U.s. Merchant Marine. There was no notation of race on my picture ID but there was a description of complexion. Mine was called “ruddy”.

I have gotten one of those Ancestry.com DNA tests that shows me as all British Isles, Central Europe, and even some Scandinavian. The only exception was a very small admixture of Jewish DNA. Yet, many times I’ve been approached by Hispanics thinking I was an Hispanic that might could translate for them.

Dark complexion doesn’t mean you are not Caucasian.

As far as I know East Indian people, Arabs, and Persians are Caucasian.
Originally Posted by Seafire
Crime is crime....

Why should it be any difference on who committed it?

If you have any interest in controlling it you need to know who commits it.

If crime has nothing to do with race, why does one race commit far more of it everywhere in the world you find them? This is true to such an extent that...and you won't believe this...crime stats have to be manipulated when people start noticing.
Originally Posted by BALLISTIK
It looks like Louby Innocent's record was corrected recently, but the other three are still there.
Corrected, likely, only after caught.
Maybe they identify as white. Everything is so batshidt crazy anymore.
Originally Posted by BALLISTIK
Originally Posted by FatCity67
That is too easily debunked by checking the offender website.

I'll call BS on the Xweet.

And you'd be wrong... it's been going on for years, and they always claim it's a 'clerical error', and yet it keeps happening and the records are never correctted. I've never seen a White person's criminal record that stated they were Black. But I've seen Asian, Black, Latino/Hispanics listed as Non-Hispanic, White.

He wasn't wrong. This lists Louby Innocent as black, not white.

Texas Public Sex Offend Registry
Originally Posted by Longbob
Originally Posted by BALLISTIK
Originally Posted by FatCity67
That is too easily debunked by checking the offender website.

I'll call BS on the Xweet.

And you'd be wrong... it's been going on for years, and they always claim it's a 'clerical error', and yet it keeps happening and the records are never correctted. I've never seen a White person's criminal record that stated they were Black. But I've seen Asian, Black, Latino/Hispanics listed as Non-Hispanic, White.

He wasn't wrong. This lists Louby Innocent as black, not white.

Texas Public Sex Offend Registry


The Long and short of it is that it's an input data entry error somewhere along the several different agencies and who knows how many entry clerks not including the original arresting officer unless you can prove otherwise.

Why didn't they show a sample of 100 Black offenders who probably are all identified as black?

Or how many White offenders that are identified as Black?

What about females? Where is that sampling.

I get what the premise of the post is about I just don't believe it plays out unless you have a much larger sample amongst all races and genders. Not to mention what agencies the originated the offender entry and if there is an agenda bias there.

You don't have to convince me Wokeism has infected all levels of Governmental Bureaucracy.

I originated the label Administrative State Pension Whore many years ago for a reason.

So yes IT's BULLCHIT in this instance unless you can prove your thesis with more than a hand full of examples out of tens of thousands per agency.
Originally Posted by Longbob
Originally Posted by BALLISTIK
Originally Posted by FatCity67
That is too easily debunked by checking the offender website.

I'll call BS on the Xweet.

And you'd be wrong... it's been going on for years, and they always claim it's a 'clerical error', and yet it keeps happening and the records are never correctted. I've never seen a White person's criminal record that stated they were Black. But I've seen Asian, Black, Latino/Hispanics listed as Non-Hispanic, White.

He wasn't wrong. This lists Louby Innocent as black, not white.

Texas Public Sex Offend Registry

Check the other three out, and there's still an archive of the page where it WAS listed as White. As I noted earlier they must have recently corrected that record, but the other three are still listed as White. So, yes... he is still wrong, but they updated one of them, and the other three are still flawed. It wasn't BS at all, instead the record was fixed. So now both of you are wrong, congratulations.

Uno

Dos

Tres
Originally Posted by BALLISTIK
Originally Posted by Longbob
Originally Posted by BALLISTIK
Originally Posted by FatCity67
That is too easily debunked by checking the offender website.

I'll call BS on the Xweet.

And you'd be wrong... it's been going on for years, and they always claim it's a 'clerical error', and yet it keeps happening and the records are never correctted. I've never seen a White person's criminal record that stated they were Black. But I've seen Asian, Black, Latino/Hispanics listed as Non-Hispanic, White.

He wasn't wrong. This lists Louby Innocent as black, not white.

Texas Public Sex Offend Registry

Check the other three out, and there's still an archive of the page where it WAS listed as White. As I noted earlier they must have recently corrected that record, but the other three are still listed as White. So, yes... he is still wrong, but they updated one of them, and the other three are still flawed. It wasn't BS at all, instead the record was fixed. So now both of you are wrong, congratulations.

Uno

Dos

tres

Nope. I posted the one in conflict with the X post straight off the public website. You can try to parse this any way it makes you comfortable.

Carry on.
Originally Posted by Hastings
I was licensed by the United States Coast Guard in 1972 at age twenty as a Seaman in the U.s. Merchant Marine. There was no notation of race on my picture ID but there was a description of complexion. Mine was called “ruddy”.

I have gotten one of those Ancestry.com DNA tests that shows me as all British Isles, Central Europe, and even some Scandinavian. The only exception was a very small admixture of Jewish DNA. Yet, many times I’ve been approached by Hispanics thinking I was an Hispanic that might could translate for them.

Dark complexion doesn’t mean you are not Caucasian.

As far as I know East Indian people, Arabs, and Persians are Caucasian.

Don't forget Italians.

Basically any place with lots of sun or easy access to sea food.

Sea food in the diet lessons the need for the skin to absorb sun rays.
Originally Posted by BALLISTIK
Check the other three out, and there's still an archive of the page where it WAS listed as White. As I noted earlier they must have recently corrected that record, but the other three are still listed as White. So, yes... he is still wrong, but they updated one of them, and the other three are still flawed. It wasn't BS at all, instead the record was fixed. So now both of you are wrong, congratulations.

Uno

Dos

Tres

Christ, this country has enough issues without inventing new ones.

Three or even four misidentified inmates, perps, or convicts out of the MILLIONS in our system does not an agenda make.

Quote
Criminal Justice Fact Sheet
NAACP
https://naacp.org › resources › criminal-justice-fact-sheet
In 2014, African Americans constituted 2.3 million, or 34%, of the total 6.8 million correctional population. African Americans are incarcerated at more than 5 ...

That is a 1 or 2 in a million mistake.
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Christ, this country has enough issues without inventing new ones.

Three or even four misidentified inmates, perps, or convicts out of the MILLIONS in our system does not an agenda make.
What makes you think it's not pervasive? If you find four examples, chances are that there are many more that you don't know about.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Christ, this country has enough issues without inventing new ones.

Three or even four misidentified inmates, perps, or convicts out of the MILLIONS in our system does not an agenda make.
What makes you think it's not pervasive? If you find four examples, chances are that there are many more that you don't know about.

Because YOU have an agenda. And there are many more like you with the same agenda. I am confident if these errors were really prevalent you (collective) would have used some fancy search tool to ferret them out for us, rather than just find four examples, one of which has been fixed.

ETA: Remember the left's primary objective is to convince the masses that Blacks are incarcerated at unjust rates due simply to racist policies. If those black inmates are misidentified as White, that is contrary to the statistics desired for presentation.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Easier that way to make the records conform with the narrative.

Twitter
You’re better than this
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Originally Posted by BALLISTIK
Check the other three out, and there's still an archive of the page where it WAS listed as White. As I noted earlier they must have recently corrected that record, but the other three are still listed as White. So, yes... he is still wrong, but they updated one of them, and the other three are still flawed. It wasn't BS at all, instead the record was fixed. So now both of you are wrong, congratulations.

Uno

Dos

Tres

Christ, this country has enough issues without inventing new ones.

Three or even four misidentified inmates, perps, or convicts out of the MILLIONS in our system does not an agenda make.

Quote
Criminal Justice Fact Sheet
NAACP
https://naacp.org › resources › criminal-justice-fact-sheet
In 2014, African Americans constituted 2.3 million, or 34%, of the total 6.8 million correctional population. African Americans are incarcerated at more than 5 ...

That is a 1 or 2 in a million mistake.




Holy crap, consider the implications.


The stats showing how 13% of the population committ a huge percentage of the crimes and make up 40% of prisoners.

If blacks are being labeled white, just how much worse are the real stats?
All part of the same pattern:

Originally Posted by Longbob
Originally Posted by BALLISTIK
Originally Posted by Longbob
Originally Posted by BALLISTIK
Originally Posted by FatCity67
That is too easily debunked by checking the offender website.

I'll call BS on the Xweet.

And you'd be wrong... it's been going on for years, and they always claim it's a 'clerical error', and yet it keeps happening and the records are never correctted. I've never seen a White person's criminal record that stated they were Black. But I've seen Asian, Black, Latino/Hispanics listed as Non-Hispanic, White.

He wasn't wrong. This lists Louby Innocent as black, not white.

Texas Public Sex Offend Registry

Check the other three out, and there's still an archive of the page where it WAS listed as White. As I noted earlier they must have recently corrected that record, but the other three are still listed as White. So, yes... he is still wrong, but they updated one of them, and the other three are still flawed. It wasn't BS at all, instead the record was fixed. So now both of you are wrong, congratulations.

Uno

Dos

tres

Nope. I posted the one in conflict with the X post straight off the public website. You can try to parse this any way it makes you comfortable.

Carry on.

Do you understand the concept of time?
© 24hourcampfire