If this was a dude, you’d all want to castrate him and drag him through the streets behind a truck as a serial predatory pedophile.
But some of you are going to say “Damn, I wish I had a teacher like that!” Show your support by kicking in a few bucks to help the 12 yr old pay his child support obligations.
This Boomer thinks that any person sexually attracted to children, regardless of the sexes involved, has no business being a teacher or anything else associated with children.
I meant that that's why guys see a hot teacher accused of this, and remember back when they were in high school fantasizing about it, so tend not to have hatred in their hearts for the teacher due to that. Obviously, it should still be treated as a crime.
Teachers shouldn't be having sex with junior high students regardless of the sex of the teacher or student. That said I doubt I would have been scared much if one of my hot teachers would have had sex with me when I was in the 8th grade. But that doesn't mean it is right and dang sure is a illegal. Pretty stupid actually.
Graduated HS in 1976. It was pretty common knowledge that at least 2 female teachers were banging male students. At least 2-3 male teachers were banging female students. It's never been that uncommon, just not talked about as much.
Nobody much cared, and no lives were ruined by it. Not saying it was right, just that it isn't anything new. And not just teachers. The age of consent used to be as young as 12 in many places and a LOT of girls were married by 13 or 14 in my parents' generation.
Graduated HS in 1976. It was pretty common knowledge that at least 2 female teachers were banging male students. At least 2-3 male teachers were banging female students. It's never been that uncommon, just not talked about as much.
Nobody much cared, and no lives were ruined by it. Not saying it was right, just that it isn't anything new. And not just teachers. The age of consent used to be as young as 12 in many places and a LOT of girls were married by 13 or 14 in my parents' generation.
Yeah who cares right?
You know for a fact that it was a completely victimless crime and that no one was affected negatively.
Graduated HS in 1976. It was pretty common knowledge that at least 2 female teachers were banging male students. At least 2-3 male teachers were banging female students. It's never been that uncommon, just not talked about as much.
Nobody much cared, and no lives were ruined by it. Not saying it was right, just that it isn't anything new. And not just teachers. The age of consent used to be as young as 12 in many places and a LOT of girls were married by 13 or 14 in my parents' generation.
Yep, when I was in high school it was common knowledge that a female gym teacher (very hot) was having regular sex with a senior. This was confirmed when, right after he graduated, they got married.
The variance is sentencing for these crimes is pretty extreme. Some get off Scott free, others take a whooping. I work with a dude that got into some underage porn. He was jailed for about three weeks, and now under house arrest. Dude lost his career and it will likely cost him about $30,000 in legal fees. Another local dude was caught molesting three of his daughters. He gave up parental rights and walked Scott free. Amazing. I guess it depends on the DA and their perspective on the issue. Both of these instances happened in rural N.C. counties.
II find the suggestion that anyone would be ok with a teacher molesting 12 year olds a bit bizarre.
Just the males apparently...and only heterosexually.
Everything else is very bad.
Jim and Dutch; Good morning to you both, I hope that you and your respective families are well this morning.
As I believe you both might be aware, our youngest is a high school teacher who is enough like her old man to go down the odd rabbit hole in study.
I'm blessed too for sure that both of our girls still will sit down with me when we get together and we can have some pretty frank discourse. Oh and no, they emphatically do not agree with me on a lot of subjects.
That said and based on some chats we've had, this sort of thing is really, really bad for the kids. As she and Prof. Jordan Peterson is wont to say, "We don't even really know how bad", as in we've not been able to measure it yet, but it's bad.
Not only that but of course it damages or certainly has the potential to damage present and future relationships for student/parent, student/teacher and parent/teacher.
There's nothing good whatsoever about that sort of thing, sorry that's pretty clear.
Like a whole lot of trends we're seeing today, we just don't know how bad or how many generations it might affect.
I was in high school in 1968, big school in suburban Atlanta. I had a hot blonde Geometry teacher, she was 22 years old, it was her first teaching job. Word got out that she was banging a football player. But Doug was no child, he was 6-4 and 225, and supposedly he was 19 years old but he looked older than that.
The Principal found out, and the word was that during Christmas break, he invited Miss R. into his office, and told her she needed to resign and leave town and they would call it a day.
On January 3 we had a new Geometry teacher. I guess Doug had to find a new girlfriend.
She informed the 12 year old that "they are" the father of her unborn child??
What has happened to English grammar in the US??
That's gender pronoun wokeness.
"What are your preferred pronouns?"
he / him
she / her
they / them (for neutral gender; non-binary)
The problem for the woke, is that there isn't really a singular, neutral gender pronoun. Well, actually, there is one: it. But I don't think they want to use that word for obvious reasons.
A Guide To Gender Identity Terms JUNE 2, 2021 Laurel Wamsley | NPR
I was in high school in 1968, big school in suburban Atlanta. I had a hot blonde Geometry teacher, she was 22 years old, it was her first teaching job. Word got out that she was banging a football player. But Doug was no child, he was 6-4 and 225, and supposedly he was 19 years old but he looked older than that.
The Principal found out, and the word was that during Christmas break, he invited Miss R. into his office, and told her she needed to resign and leave town and they would call it a day.
On January 3 we had a new Geometry teacher. I guess Doug had to find a new girlfriend.
Doug wasn't a minor, but at least the principal had the sense to recognize a potential hand grenade when he saw it. Nowadays, it's understood the inappropriate power dynamic in a relationship like that.
Did y'all ever watch Streetcar Named Desire. Blanche was a high school English teacher in a small Southern town. Word got out that she was banging some of the students. The principal invited her into his office and told her he wouldn't file charges if she would resign and skip town.
Blanche resigned on the spot and took the train to New Orleans, and moved in with her brother in law Stanley.
II find the suggestion that anyone would be ok with a teacher molesting 12 year olds a bit bizarre.
Just the males apparently...and only heterosexually.
Everything else is very bad.
Jim and Dutch; Good morning to you both, I hope that you and your respective families are well this morning.
As I believe you both might be aware, our youngest is a high school teacher who is enough like her old man to go down the odd rabbit hole in study.
I'm blessed too for sure that both of our girls still will sit down with me when we get together and we can have some pretty frank discourse. Oh and no, they emphatically do not agree with me on a lot of subjects.
That said and based on some chats we've had, this sort of thing is really, really bad for the kids. As she and Prof. Jordan Peterson is wont to say, "We don't even really know how bad", as in we've not been able to measure it yet, but it's bad.
Not only that but of course it damages or certainly has the potential to damage present and future relationships for student/parent, student/teacher and parent/teacher.
There's nothing good whatsoever about that sort of thing, sorry that's pretty clear.
Like a whole lot of trends we're seeing today, we just don't know how bad or how many generations it might affect.
Best to you both.
Dwayne
I get kinda riled up when these janers start taking about how the sexual abuse of children is great when it's a male child.
You are absolutely correct that the studies show that the sexual abuse of children is bad. Even if it's a male child.
That's why they call it abuse. Or at least apparently why.
Speaking of trends...the studies are finding that the social media explosion has been monumentally bad for the kids about 12 to 22 right now.
Those that have come before and after have not been affected as severely it seems.
We seem to be okay with testing everything on our children first.
Jim; Morning again sir, I hope the family is well and if you all are calving already it's going okay.
Thanks for the reply, we're on the same page on both topics.
Where our daughter teaches in the Lower Mainland many, if not most of her students come from other places or at least do not speak English at home, so much of the class has translator apps on their phones.
That means they all have phones in class.
That also means the less motivated won't be concentrating on class subjects but will be on social media.
Once more according to her and folks such as Jordan Peterson mentioned earlier, we know that much screen time is bad for kids, we just don't have a grasp yet as to exactly how bad.
The school shutdowns that came with the beer flu will be another ripple we'll all be dealing with for the rest of our lives too by the way. Those kids aren't okay Jim, we just can't say yet how not okay.
As they attempt and most likely fail trade school and university, we'll begin to grasp what was done to them, but for many it will be too late.
Anyways sir, it's good to talk to folks who want to look deeper into a few things and who are hoping to affect some positive change.
All the best to you all down on the Conrad Ranch and Grain operation.
Beginning at a very minor level of inappropriate interaction, any sort of personal relationship with a student absolutely poisons the classroom environment. This is also true in college, and why such interactions are also absolutely forbidden in the military.
Beyond that, life is already difficult enough for teenagers, exponentially even more so in this age of mass-text gossip. All you really need to know is the vast majority of these things involve students from crappy home environments/lack of parenting.
Worse, mentally stable adults are also unlikely to engage in such behavior. Even in the stereotypical senior football player/hot gym teacher scenario , who were the other guys she has slept with? Even without warts and herpes, would you want your kid around a bat schidt crazy woman?
II find the suggestion that anyone would be ok with a teacher molesting 12 year olds a bit bizarre.
Just the males apparently...and only heterosexually.
Everything else is very bad.
Jim and Dutch; Good morning to you both, I hope that you and your respective families are well this morning.
As I believe you both might be aware, our youngest is a high school teacher who is enough like her old man to go down the odd rabbit hole in study.
I'm blessed too for sure that both of our girls still will sit down with me when we get together and we can have some pretty frank discourse. Oh and no, they emphatically do not agree with me on a lot of subjects.
That said and based on some chats we've had, this sort of thing is really, really bad for the kids. As she and Prof. Jordan Peterson is wont to say, "We don't even really know how bad", as in we've not been able to measure it yet, but it's bad.
Not only that but of course it damages or certainly has the potential to damage present and future relationships for student/parent, student/teacher and parent/teacher.
There's nothing good whatsoever about that sort of thing, sorry that's pretty clear.
Like a whole lot of trends we're seeing today, we just don't know how bad or how many generations it might affect.
Best to you both.
Dwayne
I get kinda riled up when these janers start taking about how the sexual abuse of children is great when it's a male child.
You are absolutely correct that the studies show that the sexual abuse of children is bad. Even if it's a male child.
That's why they call it abuse. Or at least apparently why.
Speaking of trends...the studies are finding that the social media explosion has been monumentally bad for the kids about 12 to 22 right now.
Those that have come before and after have not been affected as severely it seems.
We seem to be okay with testing everything on our children first.
Another pro-tip for you: learn the meaning of what tongue in cheek means...That said, when I was in 11th grade I would have sold my own mother into slavery to get a crack at Mrs. O'Connor, my English teacher...
Jim; Thanks again for the reply, I appreciate your perspective.
Up here most of our homeless people are younger men and by extension the Fentanyl ODs are them as well.
At the same time we have a labor shortage, especially in traditionally male dominated trades.
So help me Jim nobody in the legacy media is making the connection that we as a society - for sure starting with me as a boomer - have failed young men in such a spectacular manner that they'd rather live in a tent, in a drug induced stupor and die young than participate in the society we've made.
We had a young fellow just elected in a federal by-election up here in Ontario, Jamil Jivani is his name, who in his acceptance speech talked about his goals, some of which included the need to salvage what's left of our young men. Should say too that Jamil is a "visible minority" and is far enough right leaning that it gives many folks the vapors.
Honestly this is one of the first times I heard a federal politician say anything like that and after I picked myself up off the floor, I had to listen to the whole thing again.
What most of my generation seem to fail to grasp is that this perfect storm will absolutely mean we will not get our vehicle repaired, the road plowed or our teeth fixed for starters, much less get the roof repaired or even the old folks home built. At the rate we're going up here Jim, there's going to be a lineup at the crematorium too....
Hopefully it's not too late to set things in a better direction, but the first step will be admitting we've got a problem.
Beginning at a very minor level of inappropriate interaction, any sort of personal relationship with a student absolutely poisons the classroom environment. This is also true in college, and why such interactions are also absolutely forbidden in the military.
Beyond that, life is already difficult enough for teenagers, exponentially even more so in this age of mass-text gossip. All you really need to know is the vast majority of these things involve students from crappy home environments/lack of parenting.
Worse, mentally stable adults are also unlikely to engage in such behavior. Even in the stereotypical senior football player/hot gym teacher scenario , who were the other guys she has slept with? Even without warts and herpes, would you want your kid around a bat schidt crazy woman?
It should be criminal, and it is.
In my experience, this seems like almost all that needs to be understood. Good work.
Nope! What she did was just as damaging to the 12 year old boy as it would have been had it been a man to a 12 year old girl.
It was immoral, illegal and damaging. Teaching promiscuity and fornication to anyone is wrong. This is not a joking subject. We need to follow God's direction on all issues instead of Satan.
Bonding her out, how stupid can a judge get. Then had to immediately re-arrest her for the bond violation of contacting a 12 year old victim / student. This TN county has some real problems.
Old FL remedy for such, big tree, big swamp, chain, let the night critters have her, is real slow.
II find the suggestion that anyone would be ok with a teacher molesting 12 year olds a bit bizarre.
Just the males apparently...and only heterosexually.
Everything else is very bad.
Jim and Dutch; Good morning to you both, I hope that you and your respective families are well this morning.
As I believe you both might be aware, our youngest is a high school teacher who is enough like her old man to go down the odd rabbit hole in study.
I'm blessed too for sure that both of our girls still will sit down with me when we get together and we can have some pretty frank discourse. Oh and no, they emphatically do not agree with me on a lot of subjects.
That said and based on some chats we've had, this sort of thing is really, really bad for the kids. As she and Prof. Jordan Peterson is wont to say, "We don't even really know how bad", as in we've not been able to measure it yet, but it's bad.
Not only that but of course it damages or certainly has the potential to damage present and future relationships for student/parent, student/teacher and parent/teacher.
There's nothing good whatsoever about that sort of thing, sorry that's pretty clear.
Like a whole lot of trends we're seeing today, we just don't know how bad or how many generations it might affect.
Best to you both.
Dwayne
I get kinda riled up when these janers start taking about how the sexual abuse of children is great when it's a male child.
You are absolutely correct that the studies show that the sexual abuse of children is bad. Even if it's a male child.
That's why they call it abuse. Or at least apparently why.
Speaking of trends...the studies are finding that the social media explosion has been monumentally bad for the kids about 12 to 22 right now.
Those that have come before and after have not been affected as severely it seems.
We seem to be okay with testing everything on our children first.
Another pro-tip for you: learn the meaning of what tongue in cheek means...That said, when I was in 11th grade I would have sold my own mother into slavery to get a crack at Mrs. O'Connor, my English teacher...
II find the suggestion that anyone would be ok with a teacher molesting 12 year olds a bit bizarre.
Just the males apparently...and only heterosexually.
Everything else is very bad.
Jim and Dutch; Good morning to you both, I hope that you and your respective families are well this morning.
As I believe you both might be aware, our youngest is a high school teacher who is enough like her old man to go down the odd rabbit hole in study.
I'm blessed too for sure that both of our girls still will sit down with me when we get together and we can have some pretty frank discourse. Oh and no, they emphatically do not agree with me on a lot of subjects.
That said and based on some chats we've had, this sort of thing is really, really bad for the kids. As she and Prof. Jordan Peterson is wont to say, "We don't even really know how bad", as in we've not been able to measure it yet, but it's bad.
Not only that but of course it damages or certainly has the potential to damage present and future relationships for student/parent, student/teacher and parent/teacher.
There's nothing good whatsoever about that sort of thing, sorry that's pretty clear.
Like a whole lot of trends we're seeing today, we just don't know how bad or how many generations it might affect.
Best to you both.
Dwayne
I get kinda riled up when these janers start taking about how the sexual abuse of children is great when it's a male child.
You are absolutely correct that the studies show that the sexual abuse of children is bad. Even if it's a male child.
That's why they call it abuse. Or at least apparently why.
Speaking of trends...the studies are finding that the social media explosion has been monumentally bad for the kids about 12 to 22 right now.
Those that have come before and after have not been affected as severely it seems.
We seem to be okay with testing everything on our children first.
Another pro-tip for you: learn the meaning of what tongue in cheek means...That said, when I was in 11th grade I would have sold my own mother into slavery to get a crack at Mrs. O'Connor, my English teacher...
This Boomer thinks that any person sexually attracted to children, regardless of the sexes involved, has no business being a teacher or anything else associated with children.
Agreed. Pretty sure their access to oxygen should be limited as well.
The sexual assault of children only comes into effect for female children.
At least that's what the Boomers say.
Not this boomer. Hang her.
Good man.
It makes me sick to read posts here about how grown men and fathers would buy their minor son a cigar if he was being sexually assaulted by a female teacher.
Then you say what about your minor daughter being sexually assaulted by a male teacher.
Well that's no good because women and girls are to only use sex for procreation and never enjoy it.
[quote=Jim_Conrad]The sexual assault of children only comes into effect for female children. At least that's what the Boomers say.[/quote
You are so full of crap.....
No I am not.
Just go back to the myriad other threads about this same topic and see all the men saying how wonderful child sexual assault is.
They don't get as much of a chance now because some of us called out the bullshit.
Maybe there are some who mouthed off cause they thought it would make them "sound cool" or whatever other "Boomer" saying you want to add. They are full of crap too. Boomers certainly don't have the market cornered in sexual perversion regarding children or otherwise for that matter. There are trannys reading story books to kids or having fashion shows that cater to kids - it ain't the Boomers that are the parents of these kids. Each generation goes south with each generation - boiling frog syndrome.
I say you are full of crap simply because you said it was a Boomer problem. You are just wrong my friend.
[quote=Jim_Conrad]The sexual assault of children only comes into effect for female children. At least that's what the Boomers say.[/quote
You are so full of crap.....
No I am not.
Just go back to the myriad other threads about this same topic and see all the men saying how wonderful child sexual assault is.
They don't get as much of a chance now because some of us called out the bullshit.
Maybe there are some who mouthed off cause they thought it would make them "sound cool" or whatever other "Boomer" saying you want to add. They are full of crap too. Boomers certainly don't have the market cornered in sexual perversion regarding children or otherwise for that matter. There are trannys reading story books to kids or having fashion shows that cater to kids - it ain't the Boomers that are the parents of these kids. Each generation goes south with each generation - boiling frog syndrome.
I say you are full of crap simply because you said it was a Boomer problem. You are just wrong my friend.
[quote=Jim_Conrad]The sexual assault of children only comes into effect for female children. At least that's what the Boomers say.[/quote
You are so full of crap.....
No I am not.
Just go back to the myriad other threads about this same topic and see all the men saying how wonderful child sexual assault is.
They don't get as much of a chance now because some of us called out the bullshit.
Maybe there are some who mouthed off cause they thought it would make them "sound cool" or whatever other "Boomer" saying you want to add. They are full of crap too. Boomers certainly don't have the market cornered in sexual perversion regarding children or otherwise for that matter. There are trannys reading story books to kids or having fashion shows that cater to kids - it ain't the Boomers that are the parents of these kids. Each generation goes south with each generation - boiling frog syndrome.
I say you are full of crap simply because you said it was a Boomer problem. You are just wrong my friend.
Where is the line? Aside from the fraternization / position of power thing, that is. Is an 18 year old banging his 17 year old girlfriend a felon? I’ve had an employee that did a couple of years in the pen for that. Life long sex offender registry and all. Seems rather excessive in my opinion.
No one in their right mind will argue that an adult in a position of power should never be allowed to be intimate with a child in their care. On the other hand, I think the whole statutory rape thing can, and is, taken too far in some instances outside of those cases where one is in a position of power.
You Boomers musta had better looking teachers than we did!
Teachers better looking then? Have you seen pictures of the 1960s hippies? Those were some skanky looking women. Now the 70's - that's when it was good to be in high school and college. 😎
Didn't mean to make you cry - I'm just a mean "ole" Boomer - and if that's not bad enough, it's the Boomers that advocate sexual perversion. You are so full of it. LMAO.
The perversion and disgrace involved where teachers engage sexual activity with young students - regardless of gender - is rotten and has no specific association whatsoever with some boomer generational factor. That corrupt behavior has been occurring for generations.
This is not limited to the education realm and is to be condemned/punished whenever an adult in a position of authority/power/leadership usurps such advantage. Some may want to make the edges blurred but, to reinforce the proper moral code, all judgments must be aimed at protecting the youth. If a judge must err, do so on that side - it is why they are called children.
She is 38, and had sex with 21 young boys. Good Lord what a slut.
And got knocked up by a 12 year old boy? Good God what a slut.
Let's give her China Justice, take her out behind the police station and give her a single 9mm to the back of the skull. And bill her family for the cost of the cartridge.
She is 38, and had sex with 21 young boys. Good Lord what a slut.
And got knocked up by a 12 year old boy? Good God what a slut.
Let's give her China Justice, take her out behind the police station and give her a single 9mm to the back of the skull. And bill her family for the cost of the cartridge.
The psychology of someone who tries to put others down or shift the blame onto others or a group of others. (Such as blaming Boomers or even Trump for all the bad crap that goes on).
They do this because of one or more of psychological reasons as listed below: 1. Wanting to feel superior to others 2. Low self esteem 3. Childhood trauma 4. Underlying mental health conditions 5. Being bullied as a kid and don't have the mental capacity to get over it. 6. If male, he has a very small dick
Does this sound like anyone on this thread or forum????
One question....if youse Boomers don't like being painted with such a broad brush....why do you only bitch and complain about your hurt feelings in this thread.....instead of calling out the scumbags who root and cheer for the young boy who is the victim of sexual assault in the myriad other threads on the topic?
Far as I know...only an X'er and a Millenial are not too big of pussies to call bullshit on such behavior.
As the husband looks on as she's being cuffed and taken away. That had to be a gut punch. It's not like she couldn't get laid apparently, yet she's out banging 12 YOs? I have no words for such an animal.
![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/dQ4qdFLJ/8izvyz.gif)
![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/kMVqRy2Z/626-F276-D-21-A2-459-E-9012-54-FFF17-B95-F6.jpg)
![[Linked Image from people.com]](https://people.com/thmb/MlNoO50I2KNnR6BIx5ZXlwBchNo=/1500x0/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(705x134:707x136)/alissa-mccommon-arrest-3-091123-7d974444ab8246fdb026646f93d26f19.jpg)