But if I remember correctly private ownership of gold was illegal in 1971, from 1933-1974, and also back in 1917 when .gov confiscated it for "patriotic" reasons and issued gold certificates in lieu. What's to stop .gov from doing that again in an economic emergency? Gold hoarders would be up a creek then.
Yes it was, and yes they did. The compliance rate in 1933 was around 20-25%. On 31Dec75 President Ford rescinded the PEO that the great thief Roosevelt had imposed upon the people, allowing them to own physical bullion once again.
Numismatic gold, and jewelry had been allowed under the PEO. Gold was traded worldwide, and other Western countries allowed their citizens to hold gold, and many Americans did as well, especially if they had overseas connexions.
The London Gold Pool, which was the the Bank of England acting in concert with the Federal Reserve, fought for ten years to keep the price of bullion at $35/oz, as agreed under the Bretton Woods Agreement of 1944. They were unsuccessful. Nixon defaulted on US debt obligations required under treaty in August of 1971. This kicked off the first bull market in gold.
When Ford rescinded the PEO in 1975/76, he added American participation in what was a bull market in which only Westerner's-meaning primarily America and Western Europe-participated. That bull ended in 1980. It ended because Paul Volcker, Chairman of the Federal Reserve, raised interest rates 200 basis points above the current REAL rate of inflation. This made interest rates positive once again, killed inflation over the next few years, caused a major recession, and removed the reason to hold gold. He was able to do that because America was a creditor nation, and had a manufacturing economy that led the world.
That is no longer the case, and since 1971 we have lost both of those attributes. We are now the world's largest debtor nation, and have switched from manufacturing to services, and "financial engineering" and inflation are our major exports. The move that Volcker made is no longer possible because of the size of the debt.
In the government's search for revenue because of this excessive debt and the overwhelming level of "entitlements" that they have taken on, they will search for all sources of revenue that they can find, and they will print money and create as many Treasury obligations as they can to keep the Ponzi rolling.
What that means is that they will be more likely to confiscate 401k's and IRA's, or force both of those entities to have a large percentage of government paper. Since these are all .gov sponsored "retirement" funds, they are subject to rule changes and policy reversals. If I were you, I would be much more concerned with my so called "private" retirement fund being confiscated by revenue hungry .gov than I would my gold.
Gold and silver are outside the system, meaning that if you hold the physical metal, it is untraceable by .gov, easily hidden and transported, and can be used as money anywhere in the world. This is in addition to holding its purchasing power over paper money, and having no counterparty risk of default.
Having seen the government violate property rights and contract law at will over the last 10 years, I think that if given the choice, I would choose something that was physically in my hand over something that some politician or central banker promised would be worth something in 5, 10, or 30 years. History is on my side on this, and against politicians and bankers.
The choice is yours. Choose wisely.