It's pretty obvious that the Dems are very very nervous concerning voter turn out for Barry this Fall. He is grasping or even creating faux issues to energize his fleeing base especially in the swing states.
I know quite abfew independents, like myself and my wife, who will be voting ABO this Fall.
I don't think so. I think Obama will win if Romney is his opposition. Every recent poll I've seen shows Obama beating Romney, especially among Hispanic voters.
Obama is expected to raise a billion bucks. If he does, he might landslide the election.
R
I can�t think of much of anything much more useless than mid-summer pre-convention polls�
7/7/12 Rasmussen Tracking: Obama 45, Romney 45 (tie)
7/7/12 RCP Average: Obama 47.1, Romney 44.1(within the margin of error)
7/7/12 RCP Job Approval Average: Approve 47.4, Disapprove 48.1 (tie)
Statistical ties usually mean big [bleep] trouble for the incumbent, but we have seen it flip.
More better to look elsewhere for strength and weakness.
From the Christian Science Monitor:
By Liz Marlantes Jul 3, 2012
The recently leaked recording of a conference call among President Obama and some of his top 2008 campaign donors sparked a new round of less-than-rosy headlines about the president�s fundraising. On the call, Mr. Obama didn�t mince words: With donations pouring in to Republican "super political-action committees" and the Mitt Romney campaign, Obama said he is on track to become the first sitting president in modern history to be outspent by his opponent.
In fact, Obama�s campaign has been making this claim repeatedly, in a battery of urgent fundraising pleas during the past few weeks. Republicans, in turn, have been accusing the president of crying wolf � pointing out that his campaign holds the advantage in cash on hand over Mr. Romney�s.
So who�s right? Could Obama � who famously shattered all fundraising records back in 2008, collecting nearly three-quarters of a billion dollars � actually lose the money race this time around? Or is he just trying to instill fear in the hearts of Democratic donors who have been reluctant to pony up?
The short answer: Yes and yes.
Obama may wind up being outspent, but he�s still ahead in fundraising for now (we think � though the activity of some outside groups is murky enough that it�s hard to be totally definitive).
What seems more certain is that the president won�t wield anything like the overwhelming cash advantage he had over Sen. John McCain in 2008.
Instead, 2012 is shaping up to be a very competitive fundraising battle that will probably break a variety of records�
From the Des Moines Register report:
619,452 Iowa voters are now registered Republican, compared to 598,074 Democrats. Both parties, however, are outnumbered by No Party voters, at 655,457.
Democrats held a lead in registrations for several years beginning in mid-2006, but fell behind Republicans earlier this spring.
In an e-mailed statement, Iowa Democratic Party spokesman Michael Hunt said additional Republican registrations in June were probably related to the unusually large number of contested GOP races in the June 5 primary election, rather than a new and specific preference for Republican policies over Democratic ones.
From the New York Times:
At a campaign stop in Poland, Ohio, on Friday, Mr. Obama urged voters to take the long view, and to be mindful of the economic state he inherited.
�I want to get back to a time when middle-class families and those working to get into the middle class have some basic security,� he said. �We�ve got to deal with what�s been happening over the last decade, the last 15 years.�
Mr. Romney, on the other hand, emphasized the more recent string of weak job growth that has taken place under Mr. Obama�s leadership.
�This is a time for Americans to choose whether they want more of the same,� Mr. Romney said from Wolfeboro, N.H., where he is vacationing. �It doesn�t have to be this way. America can do better. And this kick in the gut has to end.�