Buchanan says it,..Drudge runs it

Maybe it's morning in America again.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/09/just-whose-war-is-this/

Originally Posted by Bristoe

Yet, is it really wise for Jewish organizations to put a Jewish stamp on a campaign to drag America into another war that a majority of their countrymen do not want to fight?

Does the U.S. Jewish community really want to be responsible for starting a war that ends with 2 million Christian Syrians facing a fate not unlike that of Poland�s Jews?

Congratulations, Patrick Buchanan, you finally put a finger on the Red Sea Pedestrians.

Quote

Marvin Hier of the Simon Wiesenthal Center and Abe Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League have invoked the Holocaust, with Hier charging the U.S. and Britain failed to rescue the Jews in 1942.

Their ace in the hole is fuggin stale.

On the other hand�maybe Israel is more than a little worried about chemical weapons drifting about in their tiny country�

In a call that could be seen as directed only at Washington, Israel�s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, said on August 26 that �Iran is watching, and it wants to see what will be the reaction to the use of chemical weapons.�

These comments, alongside similar sentiments expressed by columnists supportive of the Netanyahu government, mark a shift in Israel�s approach to the Syrian civil war, which has been raging for two and half years.

Initially, Israel made clear that it was not taking sides in the conflict. It limited its response to issues directly related to its own security � primarily the use of Syrian land for transferring advanced weapons to Hezbollah.

Israel�s change of tone suggests that it now sees a lack of American response to the overt use of chemical weapons as something that would embolden the Syrian president and his allies in Tehran in a way that could be harmful to Israel.

Read more: http://forward.com/articles/183065/...-attack-on-syria-lo/?p=all#ixzz2e4rsiAPf

Originally Posted by BOWSINGER

On the other hand�maybe Israel is more than a little worried about chemical weapons drifting about in their tiny country�

In a call that could be seen as directed only at Washington, Israel�s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, said on August 26 that �Iran is watching, and it wants to see what will be the reaction to the use of chemical weapons.�

These comments, alongside similar sentiments expressed by columnists supportive of the Netanyahu government, mark a shift in Israel�s approach to the Syrian civil war, which has been raging for two and half years.

Initially, Israel made clear that it was not taking sides in the conflict. It limited its response to issues directly related to its own security � primarily the use of Syrian land for transferring advanced weapons to Hezbollah.

Israel�s change of tone suggests that it now sees a lack of American response to the overt use of chemical weapons as something that would embolden the Syrian president and his allies in Tehran in a way that could be harmful to Israel.

Read more: http://forward.com/articles/183065/...-attack-on-syria-lo/?p=all#ixzz2e4rsiAPf

Why should Israel be involved at *all* in the foreign policy of the U.S.A.?

Bowsinger,...you're repeatedly running into trees, yet can't locate the forest.

[quote=Bristoe.

Why should Israel be involved at *all* in the foreign policy of the U.S.A.? [/quote]

Good grief! Look at the map!

Israel is supposed to be OUR proxy in the Mid East for killing muzzies!

I suspect the little satan is attempting to drag the Great Satan into a quagmire in the middle east.

Originally Posted by Bristoe

Bowsinger,...you're repeatedly running into trees, yet can't locate the forest.

7-c
RULE 7. You know when you have won your argument against Konspiracy Kooks when:
a. they have no response except circular logic by quoting other Konspiracy Kooks.
b. they have no response except name calling.
c. they have no response except sarcasm.
d. they have no response except to change the subject.

The only thing we can do short of putting troops on the ground is destroy their air bases, sam missle bases, army bases, and what tanks or artillery we see on the ground. However, Artillery can be hidden and can fire the poison gas in shells. Civilians might also be hit. This might be a temporary set back for Syria, like Iraq in the first Gulf war. Still doesn't remove Assad. He might retaliate and release Hezbollah to fire missles into Israel or even Iran to fire missles into Israel. Then Israel gets to retaliating and it just escalates. Oil prices will then go sky high, and we will see $4/gallon gasoline again, etc, etc. Without the UN backing and without NATO backing, it doesn't make sense. With their backing, then not much is said.