Home
It is obvious, among other things, that the serendipity of winning both houses of congress is the ability to end this madness with impeachment. Should the repubs be running on this promise and get public commitments from the RINOs that they will pursue impeachment?
RINOs don't want anybody impeached.
Originally Posted by OrangeOkie
It is obvious, among other things, that the serendipity of winning both houses of congress is the ability to end this madness with impeachment. Should the repubs be running on this promise and get public commitments from the RINOs that they will pursue impeachment?
I hate to be defeatist, but we've been through this before with arguably, greater forces at our disposal. Gosh, we're already through the looking glass. I don't think the Marching Morons are going to impeach the Head 'tard. That makes it just a distraction from them working on important issues like spying on the public more, taxing us at a greater rate and taking our guns. I guess yes, we should go for guys that will [bleep] around on impeachment hearings instead of doing those things.
Demonrats are fairly well known for not showing up to vote during midterms. If they see some R on the TV promising to impeach their savior as a campaign promise they will probably get motivated to go vote. As long as they keep their wellfare/foodstamp/obamaphones they will stay home. I say don't even mention it until the hearings begin.
So if impeachment takes place, what effects will it have on the real problem? Will putting Biden in solve anything?

We need reform along with impeachment. Cut the head off, and throw the rest of the body out too.
we have seen the last impeachment proceedings. No one on either side of the aisle wants to see one really take place.
Sound like a good plan Holder should be at the top of the list might have a shot at him lots of failures to perform his job.
Originally Posted by mog75
Demonrats are fairly well known for not showing up to vote during midterms. If they see some R on the TV promising to impeach their savior as a campaign promise they will probably get motivated to go vote. As long as they keep their wellfare/foodstamp/obamaphones they will stay home. I say don't even mention it until the hearings begin.
Until the Republicans have 2/3 of the senate, an impeachment is just a waste of time.
So was impeaching Clinton. Useless.
barring a very few exceptions


most of what we see emanating from DC, is just the longest running reality TV series


it's just entertainment, meant to distract you and believe that your vote makes a difference.

lol yeah right


ok so which one of you voted for them to bankrupt SS?

how many of you voted for them to exempt themselves from SS?

how many of you voted that they set in place automatic pay raises
for themselves?

how many of you voted for them to spend us into debt oblivion?

how many of you voted for them to spend all the money they do on Secret Service details, lavish parties and entertaining lobbyists?



oh yes your vote matters so freaking much!

freaking theater, nada more nada less


Impeaching God and getting a conviction is impossible. From day one, the President is a representation of God on Earth.

Impeaching and convicting God is a waste of time.
Yes! If the GOP can make a case to impeach they should and then they should move forward with it rather than just talking about it. The impeachment issue makes the conservative movement appear to be a spoiled child who can not win at the ballot box and must revert to a childish temper tantrum.

So Yes!
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
So was impeaching Clinton. Useless.
BJ Clinton deserved impeachment for perjury.
What they need to do is emphasize Tryant Obama the Liar's lawless rule and that he should resign. Make the progressive fascists defend his crimes.j
Originally Posted by OrangeOkie
It is obvious, among other things, that the serendipity of winning both houses of congress is the ability to end this madness with impeachment. Should the repubs be running on this promise and get public commitments from the RINOs that they will pursue impeachment?



Republicans Should Check Their Impeachment Urge-Bloomberg News..;.


I know all of you are big Bloomberg fans so check this out!

I think you should push forward hard for impeachment and the sooner the better!


Quote
I believed that some Republican backbencher (OK, I predicted Michele Bachmann, but any of the radicals seemed likely) would introduce articles of impeachment at some point, the incentives and the attitudes of Republican leaders tended to make it

Second, even though scandal-mongering is lucrative for Republicans, impeachment attaches an end-point to a scandal once the Senate votes against removal. Why not just keep �investigating� indefinitely?1



An end point? The GOP loved to stir the pot but to actually stem up to the plate.....Naaaaaaa...Spineless!


Step up boys!


"Palin/Cruz 2016"


"2012 can't get here fast enough!"
May 4th. Damn this global warming sucks.

[Linked Image]
You do understand the difference between Global Warming and Impeachment don't you? You can't be this stupid...are you?

Damn! You must be one huge disappointment to your parents and family! I am pulling for ya man! Go back to school and get that GED...really!
Isn't there a gas pipe you can suck on?
Walt likes to suck on a different kind of "pipe".
.... j _ c k _ f f.

[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
So was impeaching Clinton. Useless.


yes, but it is on his record in history from that day forward
Conrad,

Romney is the essence of progressive and you LOVE him. In fact, Romney is more liberal that Hillary. In fact, Romney might just be more liberal than Obama.
Personally, I'm surprised, in today's political climate, that someone hasn't shot Obama. Mostly glad they haven't, because that would have really set the pot boiling. I want him out, but foolishly dream of having him forced out in disgrace, and all of his background uncovered and fully disclosed. Making him pay the country back for some of the funds he's wasted would be nice, also.

Like I said, dreaming.

I have a friend who is a yella dawg Demo, he still worships Clinton, refuses to acknowledge the impeachment, or anything else.
Originally Posted by bea175
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
So was impeaching Clinton. Useless.


yes, but it is on his record in history from that day forward
As if he gives a chit.. It sure hasn't slowed the old bastid down, now, has it?? I don't think his earnings have dropped to zero. He's not in jail. Still looked on as quite favorable by all the Dems and half the GOP..

Yep - that REALLY hurt ol' Bubba...

Originally Posted by Mikewriter
Personally, I'm surprised, in today's political climate, that someone hasn't shot Obama. Mostly glad they haven't, because that would have really set the pot boiling. I want him out, but foolishly dream of having him forced out in disgrace, and all of his background uncovered and fully disclosed. Making him pay the country back for some of the funds he's wasted would be nice, also.

Like I said, dreaming..
My dream is having the pilot of AF-1 take one for the team... Only problem is, the AIC and Mooch are never on board by themselves...

Yeah - that's MY dream...
Originally Posted by SansSouci
Conrad,

Romney is the essence of progressive and you LOVE him. In fact, Romney is more liberal that Hillary. In fact, Romney might just be more liberal than Obama.


I don't think so...
Originally Posted by OrangeOkie
It is obvious, among other things, that the serendipity of winning both houses of congress is the ability to end this madness with impeachment. Should the repubs be running on this promise and get public commitments from the RINOs that they will pursue impeachment?


No, there is no issue that the country will back as an impeachable offense. Then there is the idea that Senate would need to bring � to trail to remove him from office. It won't happen. That would damage the GOP far more than help the country. � has too many vocal and organized supporters i.e. minorities, GLBT, unions, etc. that will go to bat for him and turn any such movement into a fiasco.

Best you can hope for is a GOP sweep in the House and Senate and stall his progressivism.
Originally Posted by hatari


No, there is no issue that the country will back as an impeachable offense.
Correct to the max.. The AIC could murder and rape a dozen nuns in a convent and he'd not get so much as a slap on the wrist.
Quote
Then there is the idea that Senate would need to bring � to trail to remove him from office. It won't happen.
Correct again. Reid will NEVER allow that in a zillion years - even if the AIC had every member of Reid's family executed.
Quote
That would damage the GOP far more than help the country. � has too many vocal and organized supporters i.e. minorities, GLBT, unions, etc. that will go to bat for him and turn any such movement into a fiasco.

Best you can hope for is a GOP sweep in the House and Senate and stall his progressivism.
That...
Originally Posted by SansSouci
Conrad,

Romney is the essence of progressive and you LOVE him. In fact, Romney is more liberal that Hillary. In fact, Romney might just be more liberal than Obama.



Ouch!

Now that is going to leave a mark! Are you ready for the $hit these ding bats are about to throw at you? Lock up your dog and hide your children!
Originally Posted by OrangeOkie
It is obvious, among other things, that the serendipity of winning both houses of congress is the ability to end this madness with impeachment. Should the repubs be running on this promise and get public commitments from the RINOs that they will pursue impeachment?


Campaign issue? No

After the election and presumably with the RNC controlling both houses of Congress? Yeah, go for the throat and watch him bleed like a stuck pig.
Now Not Time To Impeach Obama, But Let Voters Indict Him

Investors.com
Posted 07/28/2014 06:53 PM ET

[Linked Image]
President Clinton apologizes to the nation from the Rose
Garden on Dec. 11, 1998, after his impeachment


Impeachment: Now is not the time to launch the
Constitution's remedy for President Obama's unprecedented
lawlessness. Now is the time to stand aside and let Democrats
receive the much-deserved wrath of voters.

Rep. Steve Stockman, R-Texas, on a nighttime inspection of the
border with author Jerome Corsi of WorldNetDaily, said:
"President Obama is begging to be impeached," as he mulls
letting "five million illegal immigrant kids and teenagers into
the United States."

According to Stockman, Obama's "senior advisers believe that is
the only chance the Democratic Party has to avoid a major
electoral defeat" this November.

"Impeachment," Stockman believes, "could motivate the Democratic
Party base to come out and vote" in an off-year congressional
election that looks bleak for that party, with the Senate set
to change over to Republican control as the GOP retains the
House.


In considering the gravity of impeachment, a careful look at
history is a must.

President Andrew Johnson's impeachment in 1868 was followed by
his acquittal in the Senate by a margin one vote short of the
two-thirds majority needed. Johnson had defied a law on cabinet
appointments that was ultimately determined to be
unconstitutional, and was repealed by Congress even before it
was found so. His impeachment was undeniably a politicized
extension of the nation's Civil War divide.

The case against President Clinton was far stronger, there being
no doubt he violated the law, committing perjury in grand jury
testimony regarding the Monica Lewinsky scandal. But neither of
his articles of impeachment ended up getting even a simple
majority, although the vote was 50-50 that Clinton had
obstructed justice.

Because of his obvious guilt, many members of Congress 15 years
ago believed impeaching Clinton was the right thing to do, even
if the Senate ultimately acquitted him. They believed his
presidency deserved that indelible blemish.

Right now, impeaching Obama would backfire on Republicans; a
majority of senators is absolutely impossible, let alone the
two-thirds needed for conviction and removal from office. And
Democrats have already begun raising substantial money by
publicizing GOP itchiness to impeach.

Next year, if Republicans do gain a Senate majority, two-thirds
in favor of throwing Obama out of office will still be
unlikely. But a majority of senators in favor will be possible.

That would mean most senators, "on Oath or Affirmation," as the
Constitution demands, not only voting to remove the president
for breaking our nation's laws, but also voting in favor of
Obama's "disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of
honor, Trust or Profit under the United States."

As with Clinton, it may well be the right thing to do � when the
time is right. For now, it is time to let the voters show how
they feel about the mess Obama and his party have put the
country in, much of it the result of lawbreaking and deceiving
the public.
NO, the Repubs should not be running with impeachment as a campaign issue - it would only serve to mobilize the leftists to fully engage their voting fraud system.
Originally Posted by 2legit2quit
barring a very few exceptions


most of what we see emanating from DC, is just the longest running reality TV series


it's just entertainment, meant to distract you and believe that your vote makes a difference.

lol yeah right


ok so which one of you voted for them to bankrupt SS?

how many of you voted for them to exempt themselves from SS?

how many of you voted that they set in place automatic pay raises
for themselves?

how many of you voted for them to spend us into debt oblivion?

how many of you voted for them to spend all the money they do on Secret Service details, lavish parties and entertaining lobbyists?



oh yes your vote matters so freaking much!

freaking theater, nada more nada less




Bingo.
Quote
Should impeachment be a campaign issue?


It is for the Dems... and it is working

We should have kept our moths shut until after the election

Well no help now

Snake
Here is the result

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/29/boehner-rules-out-impeachment/

Quote
Talk of impeachment was cooked up by a White House desperate for something to rally Democrats ahead of November�s elections, House Speaker John A. Boehner said Tuesday, flatly ruling out any action on the controversial suggestion.

�We have no plans to impeach the president. We have no future plans,� Mr. Beohner said. �Listen, it�s all a scam started by Democrats at the White House.�

Democrats have acknowledged impeachment talk has been good for their fundraising, but also say there�s some fire behind all the smoke. On Tuesday, congressional Democrats circulated a list of GOP candidates and sitting lawmakers who have said they want to see President Obama be impeached.

Some conservative commenters have said impeachment is the right step, given the way Mr. Obama has chosen to enforce or not enforce laws written by Congress.

But Republican leaders have tried to squelch the talk, saying they are focused on pursuing their lawsuit against Mr. Obama for overreaching his powers, and want to pass legislation on boosting job creation.


Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/29/boehner-rules-out-impeachment/#ixzz38sMSrRMs
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
Originally Posted by DigitalDan
Originally Posted by OrangeOkie
It is obvious, among other things, that the serendipity of winning both houses of congress is the ability to end this madness with impeachment. Should the repubs be running on this promise and get public commitments from the RINOs that they will pursue impeachment?


Campaign issue? No

After the election and presumably with the RNC controlling both houses of Congress? Yeah, go for the throat and watch him bleed like a stuck pig.




Building the case for Impeachment should and no doubt will be a major issue for the next 100 days until the election.

First order of business in the new House after the first of the year should Articles of Impeachment.
Then the new GOP Senate can lay those papers on Obama's desk. Tell him that after he lost all those seats in the election...it ain't looking good...

When Goldwater and company did that to Nixon, he stepped down rather than go under oath to face those charges.
Those charges were a lot less than what they could bring against Obama.
And Nixon was a lot tougher politician than Obama.
Even now Obama looks like someone who just wants to cover his head and make it all go away.

Joe Biden could be president in six months.
Originally Posted by OrangeOkie
It is obvious, among other things, that the serendipity of winning both houses of congress is the ability to end this madness with impeachment.


The only thing obvious is the impossibility. Impeachment via the House is simple as in simple majority. Conviction, as in throw the bum out, is not so simple in the Senate as it takes a super majority. We may win back the Senate but not with the margin necessary to convict the traitor.
Nixon was caught by hard evidence (the tapes) that he was involved in a crime. So far such evidence has not surfaced in O's case.

There clearly is a cover up going on related to the IRS targeting. The GOP should state as such, and without a lot of drama, list off the scandals. And state, "support us so we can get to the bottom of these matters". Assuming they win the Senate, then have Lerner (and any other stooges) arrested & offer immunity. Then see what shakes out. In the process, quietly remind the press that the Dems wiretapped & harrassed reporters and sources (like Nixon).

Patience friends, patience. And we can leave the left badly damaged for a generation.
http://gopthedailydose.com/2014/07/22/remember-november-46-senators-voted-turn-gun-rights-un/
Originally Posted by tex_n_cal
Nixon was caught by hard evidence (the tapes) that he was involved in a crime. So far such evidence has not surfaced in O's case.

There clearly is a cover up going on related to the IRS targeting. The GOP should state as such, and without a lot of drama, list off the scandals. And state, "support us so we can get to the bottom of these matters". Assuming they win the Senate, then have Lerner (and any other stooges) arrested & offer immunity. Then see what shakes out. In the process, quietly remind the press that the Dems wiretapped & harrassed reporters and sources (like Nixon).

Patience friends, patience. And we can leave the left badly damaged for a generation.



We don't need tapes...
Sarah Palin stirred this all up and she has said that "impeachment is the Constitution�s answer for a derelict, incompetent presidency, as well as for a lawless imperial presidency. Both describe the unprecedented problem we have with Obama"

The SOB will quit before he goes before the Senate with all those new Republicans and those Democrats who survived his total mess.
Those that even now won't do a meet & greet with him when he come to their state.
He has lost much of the press and bottomed out at about 40 percent with the people.
After the election...IMPEACH THE SOB!
If Obama ain't Impeachable...dig up Nixon...clean him up a bit and give him back his old job..with full apologies.
© 24hourcampfire