Home
Posted By: denton Ottawa Attacker's Firearm - 10/23/14
Of course, he was banned from owning a firearm in the first place.

He shot the soldier at the war memorial in the back with a 30-30 lever action Winchester. Police don't know where he got it.

The other interesting tidbit is that Canada's "high risk traveler" list contains just 93 people.

link
Posted By: poboy Re: Ottawa Attacker's Firearm - 10/23/14
I figured it was a back-shooting ambush.
Don't even know if the soldier's gun was loaded.
Posted By: jimmyp Re: Ottawa Attacker's Firearm - 10/23/14
what a low life coward. What a POS. Someone convince me the Quran preaches a gospel of love and peace
Posted By: denton Re: Ottawa Attacker's Firearm - 10/23/14
Apparently he shot at a second soldier and missed.

Dang glad their Sgt. at Arms was there and prepared. Good on him.
Posted By: eh76 Re: Ottawa Attacker's Firearm - 10/23/14
And the Liberals will blame it on lack of gun control
Originally Posted by poboy
I figured it was a back-shooting ambush.
Don't even know if the soldier's gun was loaded.


ABC Radio news reported that firearm carried by the deceased guard was a ceremonial firearm that had been disabled.
Posted By: Seafire Re: Ottawa Attacker's Firearm - 10/23/14
IIRC, the rifles of our guards at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier are also disabled ceremonial pieces...

NO question the guy was a loser and low life, and what better platform to give those types a false sense of importancy, than "converting" to Islam, to justify their otherwise useless existence...

I hope there is a special place in Heaven for folks like Cpl Cirrillo, and a special place in hell for "Raghead Wannabes"....

North America needs Islam here, like we need the Commies running lose on our streets doing this type of crap...

there will be plenty more copy cat follow up on this type of stuff, unless we show as a society, we are not going to put up with it and those involved, are not going to get a chance to "have rights" in court or in jail... they need to be killed on the spot....

and they think that if they come into contact with Pork or swine's blood they will go to hell.. with no 72 virgins, they need to have it poured upon them immediately after they blow their brains out...

that is all these low lifes understand...

we are willing to use a much bigger hammer on them, than they ever can use on us...
Posted By: GunGeek Re: Ottawa Attacker's Firearm - 10/23/14
Originally Posted by eh76
And the Liberals will blame it on lack of gun control
And in Canada, they may be successful at that.
Originally Posted by jimmyp
what a low life coward.


EXACTLY!

I move we give our ceremonial guards live ammunition immediately.
Posted By: TBREW401 Re: Ottawa Attacker's Firearm - 10/23/14
Saaallluuuute!
to the Master at Arms for being armed and for using it!
I would be honored to shake your hand.

NRA---the only way to stop a bad man with a gun, is by a good man with a gun!
Originally Posted by CrimsonTide
Originally Posted by jimmyp
what a low life coward.

EXACTLY!
I move we give our ceremonial guards live ammunition immediately.


I move that we allow ALL uniformed men and women to go armed at all times.

They are a HUGE target for these animals. Not allowing them the ability to fight back is just plain criminal.

Ed
Motion amended and seconded.

All in favor say "Aye!"
Posted By: ring3 Re: Ottawa Attacker's Firearm - 10/23/14
Aye!
Originally Posted by CrimsonTide
Motion amended and seconded.

All in favor say "Aye!"


AYE!!!!
Fox reported this morning the ceremonial soldiers weapons are rubber duckies not real weapons.

Mike
Posted By: fgold767 Re: Ottawa Attacker's Firearm - 10/24/14
AYE!!!!
Posted By: Scott F Re: Ottawa Attacker's Firearm - 10/24/14
AYE!!!
Posted By: OSU_Sig Re: Ottawa Attacker's Firearm - 10/24/14
Aye!
Originally Posted by denton
Of course, he was banned from owning a firearm in the first place.

He shot the soldier at the war memorial in the back with a 30-30 lever action Winchester. Police don't know where he got it.

The other interesting tidbit is that Canada's "high risk traveler" list contains just 93 people.

link
Since it was illegal for him to have it, how'd he get it? Something's not making sense. shocked
Posted By: Auger01 Re: Ottawa Attacker's Firearm - 10/24/14
Time to put the firing pin back in the "ceremonial" weapons.
Posted By: Seafire Re: Ottawa Attacker's Firearm - 10/24/14
That is just the start....

all former military personnel should be able to be armed also...

to defend themselves and their families...

to back up LEOs if need be...

and if you are a Muslim, you are under a watch, and you just lost ALL RIGHTS in this nation, until you personally prove your loyalty to this nation...

all of this crap is the opening shots.. and liberalism has allowed them to infiltrate our borders...for years now...
Originally Posted by APDDSN0864
Originally Posted by CrimsonTide
Originally Posted by jimmyp
what a low life coward.

EXACTLY!
I move we give our ceremonial guards live ammunition immediately.


I move that we allow ALL uniformed men and women to go armed at all times.

They are a HUGE target for these animals. Not allowing them the ability to fight back is just plain criminal.

Ed


^^^^^^ This. As it stands now, most are just targets because most are not permitted to be armed on their bases, or when going to or from their bases, here in the U.S. The same holds true for civilian employees, even if they have carry permits. It is sheer, unadulterated stupidity.
Posted By: Anjin Re: Ottawa Attacker's Firearm - 10/24/14
Originally Posted by Kentucky_Windage
Originally Posted by APDDSN0864
Originally Posted by CrimsonTide
Originally Posted by jimmyp
what a low life coward.

EXACTLY!
I move we give our ceremonial guards live ammunition immediately.


I move that we allow ALL uniformed men and women to go armed at all times.

They are a HUGE target for these animals. Not allowing them the ability to fight back is just plain criminal.

Ed


^^^^^^ This. As it stands now, most are just targets because most are not permitted to be armed on their bases, or when going to or from their bases, here in the U.S. The same holds true for civilian employees, even if they have carry permits. It is sheer, unadulterated stupidity.


That certainly was problem in the Fort Hood shooting.

I cannot see any sense in forbidding all people, even including MPs, from carrying. I have to believe it would have affected the behavior of the perp there.
Originally Posted by Auger01
Time to put the firing pin back in the "ceremonial" weapons.

Ammo would be good, too.
Posted By: CEJ1895 Re: Ottawa Attacker's Firearm - 10/24/14
Let the muzzies knock off a few more sheeple and then see how fast they change their pea-brains about owning and using firearms. Seems like it's time for another crusade..
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by denton
Of course, he was banned from owning a firearm in the first place.

He shot the soldier at the war memorial in the back with a 30-30 lever action Winchester. Police don't know where he got it.

The other interesting tidbit is that Canada's "high risk traveler" list contains just 93 people.

link
Since it was illegal for him to have it, how'd he get it? Something's not making sense. shocked


Lots of stuff is unlawful, but it still happens. Someone must be living in a dream world. laugh
Of course it is deplorable when an innocent gets killed. Maybe more so when they are a member of an honor guard. Where is the honor in that?
Unfortunately, we'll see just the opposite. The lefties will cry that it's all our fault for not allowing the Muzzies to have Sharia Law everywhere. And that really strict gun control would have prevented this.

They'll keep up that bleating until they're on their knees with a jihadi swinging his sword at their neck.
© 24hourcampfire