Just a chip off the 'ol Barack..................


http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-...ody-Tell-You-That-Businesses-Create-Jobs

Just another gravy train libtard "Can't Understand Normal Thinking" that don't know jack spit

....communism has tried and failed more often and more miserably than capitalism you wrinkled, bitter,ignorant old c u n t.

This is like beating a dead horse with a new club.
The Clintons have been lying their considerable asses off for far too long. And as long as the welfare class casts their votes out of fear,nothing will change.

These people are leeches; attach to an unwilling donor (productive Americans), suck the life's blood out of them, and move on.

Damn old eyes.

When I saw the thread title, I thought it said Hitler denounces business job creation.

Thought it was another Downfall parody.

Then I realized it said Hillary.

And I thought, "At this point, what difference does it make?"

What a dunce! She is gonna make Joe Biden seem almost smart.

Shes just riding the prevailing sentiment of the ignorant democratic voter.

Shell agree to anything, including "sure I gave Bill permission" to get that Office.

a recycled iteration of hussein's "you did not make that" silliness.

This was brought to your attention people because after the "midterms" are digested, the presidential election is "on".

If Shillary gets elected by staying stuff like this, it's over.

Steve.

She is doing what the Democrats do in every election, Demonize Corporate America and those that support it. She will be praised by every Private and Public employees Union and their members.

This is just the beginning of a well orchestrated plan to depict the republicans as old men with nothing but pockets full of Money stolen from the "Worken man". The next step will be how these same "Grumpy Old Men" are gearing up to take away SS and through Grandma off the cliff. It will end with her famous, "it's for the children" as those evil republicans are going to starve them and take away their school lunches.

This has worked for decades and will work once again.

Then the fat lady has sung, cus she will win in a landslide.
Not only will she have the Democrat support she needs, she will have the Support of every Libertarian and every Stay-at-Home on election day republican.

It ain't working so far...

This.

kwg

BLAM-O!

Well said, Steve!!

and she also is doing what all politicians do; taking money from the very corporations she vilifies. Which begs the question.........why do those corporate titans keep funding bitches like her?

Special Unseen Perks and treatment!

+ 1,000,000 and huge tax breaks.Oh and the Irs does not follow their money to off shore accounts, where they pay off the potlickers.

Progressivism/Socialism is nothing more than a global Ponzi scheme. The only difference between crooks like Obama/Hillary and Bernie Maddoff is that we elect the former.

I just saw a video clip of Hillary's statement. Yes, Hillary appears to have unintentionally outed herself as an avowed Communist.

I can't believe that anybody considered a political leader in either major U.S. party would say something anything close to this:

quote:-------------
She went on to state that businesses and corporations are not the job creators of America. �Don�t let anybody tell you that it�s corporations and businesses that create jobs,� the former Secretary of State said.
-------------------
Hillary proclaims herself a Communist

The Repubs need to start hammering this clip in commercials. I don't know how many people in the U.S. remember much about Communism since North Korea and Cuba are basically the last holdouts on that failed form of government (China is under socialism now), but I'm sure the Repubs could find numerous immigrants who lived under Communist regimes to tell how bad conditions were under Hillary's favored form of government.

One thing that is interesting, but not surprising, is how similar the leftist elites in this country act to how the political elites in the Soviet Union acted.

She was trying to make the point that supply side economics don't work, and she picked the absolutely DUMBEST way to try to make that point. Because not only did she make a dip-chit statement, unless you're an economist, no one caught the point she was trying to make.

what else is new with this Clinton Whore, she is right, her job wasn't earned she killed or payed someone to do it for her, and cheated her way to where she is today

It's been over for a while, we are just kicking and screaming on the way to the gallows.
Who knows, if we do it hard and loud enough we may get free.

Anyone awake and interested knows the Clinton story and their utter dependence on the government for attention, careers, sustenance, etc. - everlasting suction on the taxpayer teat.

I doubt that she even understands supply side economics but she worships at the throne of big all-powerful all-intrusive government and knows how to dupe the ignorant.

I
don't get the logic.

Here precisely is why these Marxist Socialist politicians keep pounding the drums for instituting their Brave New Marxist Socialist Fascist Police State Utopia. They are the supremely arrogant, vain, morally superior, super intelligent elitists who believe firmly that even though communism has failed everywhere, THEY will do it right THIS time.

Sorry it's kinda blurred but I cut it out of the L.A. Times years ago. You can, however, see just how these communist card carrying far leftists are hard wired to this ideology.

Hillary and Billary, Obama, Elizbeth Warren, most Democrats ("progressives"), are true believers. The left liberals never, ever, disengage.





Los Angeles Times, � 1991.

Don't ever forget either, that these professors and teachers are teaching your children how to think, from the first grade through the doctorate levels of education.

L.W.

Because giving money to Democrats keeps the skids greased and they get it back 10 fold.

Everyone seems to think that big corporations benefit from having republicans in power, that's not really true. Corporations do pretty well under democrats too, so long as they have an in with the ones in power which they get by giving them money. It really doesn't matter what a politician like Hillary says, that's just for public consumption. What really matters is what they do and that's all done behind the scenes. The democrat vision for America is a ruling elite with a permanent underclass that's hooked on government handouts. They really don't want a traditional middle class that's capable of sustaining themselves without massive government subsidies, the government paycheck keeps them hooked and voting democratic. There's a lot of money to be made by serving an underclass like that if the big business plays it's cards right, hence all the contributions to democratic politicians.

Its been over for quite some time. Bunker down an prepare.

Shod

This is an example of what is great about this forum. We read about this and watched the video three days ago, and Rush just reported it today on his show. This forum is the epitome of a "late breaking news" source.

Yeah, well, say hello to your next president. We are SO phouked

Rush had the weekend off.

Pay close attention to the numbers in the left hand column in these charts

http://www.ijreview.com/2014/10/192...its-corporations-businesses-create-jobs/

You two evidently aren't paying attention. This thread started on Friday, not today. After being busy all weekend, I saw the video clip (hint: video clips aren't seen via radio) on a TV news program this morning and found a thread that discussed Hillary's speech instead of starting a new thread. The issue is still pertinent today because we're in the middle of an important election (for states with early voting) with "election day" next Tuesday, and the person espousing Communist views is likely to be a candidate for President in 2016.

I'm the one who brought the thread back to the top today, and I have no idea if Rush had a segment about Hillary's comments today because his program is in the political "entertainment" genre, and I don't tune in to political entertainment because politics have been so depressing over the past several years.

Businesses don't create jobs, demand does.

Well if the Republicans put Mitt in there, Hillary is a sure thing.

This thread started on Friday,which is why Rush didn't comment until today...

My apologies to you and our Okie friend - I misunderstood what he was saying about this forum being a "late breaking news" source. I thought he was saying that news on this forum is dated, but on second glance it appears he was saying this forum is on top of breaking developments.

Again my apologies.

She is �-fem-blanc.

UPDATE:

Hillary Clinton:" I Didn�t Mean What I Very Clearly Said, Again"

Twisting and squirming, she tries to backtrack, clarify her statement - ain't working

Still saying same shinola:



Read short article:
http://dailycaller.com/2014/10/27/hillary-clinton-i-didnt-mean-what-i-very-clearly-said-again/

I don't get it either.
I see no sign that Hillary is getting off to any better start than she did in 2008.
Right she and Bill are trying to save some Democratic azz in this election. Using their name, money, and power to shore up some close elections.
I don't think it is working out very well for either of them.

If,four years ago, many more than us had voted for Mitt Romney we would be voting for a second term for a Great and Good Man.

Instead we are staring in the headlights of Mrs Clinton.

Very well said.

...and in 2016 these same "Stay at Home republicans and third party voters will be giving their support to Hillary or whomever gets the Dem nomination.

Romney ran a terrible campaign. All those Conservatives who were not invited to the convention or needed in the campaign were a large part of those who did not show up to vote.

Those who gave the GOP their largest mid-term election victory just two years before, were not wanted. Those who lead that victory were told to stay off the stage.

So Romney and his Numnuts lost what should have been a three hundred electoral vote win.

They had the guy from the WSJ on Bret Baier show yesterday asking why she isn't defending the close to a trillion dollars the 0 administration spent on the stimulus package.

Cost-per-job created was somewhere between $4.1 million and $540,000.

CBO: Obama stimulus may have cost as much as $4.1 million a job

Most of what you posted was reported to you and others by the Main Stream media. I'm just sayin.

Most of what I posted came from trusted conservative sources that I do not consider part of the Main Stream Media.
Romney was never my first choice until there was no one left.

The DUMBAZZES will vote for whomever will give them the most goodies!!

End of story!!

THAT did not happen in the last mid-terms!!

AND it will not happen next week in these mid-terms!!

True, sadly.

Not arguing your point, but I take it you have a suggestion?

Well if you recall, stimulus was a Republican plan. It was put together by Bush's financial team, but signed into law and implemented under Obama.

If we had McCain the difference in spending would have been very minor. Not so much how much was spent but what it was spent on.

Some corporation created a job for her daughter.