If anyone has a better explanation of the difference between Conservative and Liberal I'm all ears. And, if you ever wondered what side of the fence you sit on, this is a great test!
If a conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn't buy one. If a liberal doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.
If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn't eat meat. If a liberal is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.
If a conservative is homosexual, he quietly leads his life. If a liberal is homosexual, he demands legislated respect.
If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation. A liberal wonders who is going to take care of him.
If a conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels. Liberals demand that those they don't like be shut down.
If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church. A liberal non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced. (Unless it's a foreign religion, of course!)
That illustration will work on some liberal people but not on the hard wired, true believing Neo-lib "progressives."
For example, several years ago on a very far left site to which I belong, a long thread was posted wherein the members were all advocating the confiscation of the incredible wealth of (mainly) conservatives because it was "
not fair" for them to have so much money when so many people did not have any wealth, hadn't won Life's Lottery, were poor and suffering, etc., etc., etc.
I posted they were all correct. Income and wealth distribution should be mandatory as that would only be fair.
Given that this site was composed only of professional feature and teeeveee writers, and given that considering the thousands of members in the Writers Guild of America who were nearly always out of work and stuggling to survive by various means including scamming the many taxpayer funded welfare programs, and whereas a comparatively few writers wrote all the movies and teeeveee shows and made huge amounts of $$$$$, it would be only fair for
ALL monies paid to the
working writers be placed into a central fund at the Writers Guild and some WGA bureaucrat would send out equal checks each month to ALL writers employed or not. No writer would receive more than another whether working or not. That would only be "fair."
You should have seen the outrage and insults thrown my way. Why, you'd have thought I advocated hanging and burning effigies of Lenin, Stalin, Mao, and Castro, on upper Sunset Blvd. on Saturday night.
"THAT'S NOT FAIR!!!!!!" all screamed. Writers are different! Writers are special! Writers are artists! Writers who work deserve the huge saleries they are paid. (So long as they are good far left neo-lib "progressives.")
Of course, ever unemployed writer believes that he or she will someday sell a feature script for gigantic $$$$ or create and sell a teeeveee show and be the show runner making unbelievable sums of money Therefore, income redistribution is unacceptable for
THEM........ but not you.
I must say I got a hearty laugh as those holier-then-thou elitist leftists squirmed in their blatant hypocrisy.
As George Orwell once wrote, "All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others." Liberals think exactly that way.
L.W.