Here's another one of those damn n-ggers!


http://sports.nationalpost.com/2014...to-become-a-farmer-who-feeds-the-hungry/

Can't trust them and this clown is a great example. Fulfilled his contract then went to work trying to feed people. Disgraceful.

^^^ + 100

Tell us about the hundreds of thousands of nlgger gang members destroying our cities.

We have dumped BILLIONS OF $$$$$ into their communities and it's worse than ever.

Maybe you'd like to make a donation to the NAACP ?



http://www.jsonline.com/news/crime/...n-in-her-home-b99392981z1-283081241.html

Hey Robie !!!

Put up some links to Honkie muther fu g g ing white guys raping eldely women of color.

I'll wait. Hurry back my brutha !

Too bad the MSM & his local hood rat gangbanger leaders can't see the forrest for the trees.....the world could be a better place...I'm not a dreamer though & see what reality for what it is...

Rob,

Do you have a percent of contributing blacks to the noncontributing blacks? Will there be enough space on here to post the zeros right side of the decimal point?

Centre? .............huh?

I met one just this evening that was feeding the hungry too! What a coincidence!

He had hit a whitetail yearling as it and the doe crossed the road. Hit it with his new Dodge Challenger and broke it's pelvis. It was flailing around bleating, trying the get up, but all it could do was continually slam it's own head down on the pavement. That's why I carry a Colt .45.... nuff said.

A guy that lived 1/2 mile away asked if I wanted it, I so, no, but could he use it? He lit up, and said sure! I loaded it and took it to his house rather than throw it in the back seat of his Chrysler 300 and delivered it for processing.

He commented about how happy his wife and kids would be to have some fresh venison. I told him to thank the guy in the Challenger...

Too bad this isn't the norm rather than the exception. I'd love nothing more than for every black man to succeed and be a contributing member of society.

Unfortunately a majority of people like to make excuses for them and enable them to continue to be a drain on society. It really is too bad because if they actually got called out for there behavior instead of having 10 apologist to the one guy calling like it is they might begin to dig themselves out of the hole they have dug, and repair their image. Until that happens nothing will change.

Cool link though.

kind of a goofy thread. Calling out all the racists on the 'fire I suppose?

Still, with $25 million in the bank, I guess you can do nice things for folks.

WINNER !!!! pretty much what I eluded to in a thread a few days ago by mr rob , rob give it up nigs and people like yo are their own worst enemy

I just think some folks need to be able to tell the difference between black folks and "N-ggers"...

Not all blacks are "N's", and not all "N's" are black.

It's not rocket science.

Agreed!

Agreed! I've got some black friends. Don't have any Nigra friends.

I know there are a lot of issues in the black community. I get it. But there is a large, very rural area not more than a mile or 2 as the crow flies from my home that is almost all black. This community sends their kids to the same school I graduated from in 1976 and taught at until I retired in 2010. It is just not the same as what I see on TV.

Most of these blacks are just as redneck as Larry the Cable guy. Many of them drive around in lifted pickups and it is not uncommon to see 8-10 riding on horesback through the neighborhoods wearing their cowboy hats and dusters on weekends.

In the 12 years I was in school, and the 30 I taught I had the occasional issue with a handful of black kids. But no more than white kids. Percentage wise, probably less issues.

I think the real problem is rural vs urban. I see an awful lot of white urban kids that are just as bad as the urban blacks.

nailed it

[quote=rockinbbar]I just think some folks need to be able to tell the difference between black folks and "N-ggers"...

Not all blacks are "N's", and not all "N's" are black.

It's not rocket science. [/quote 10-4 , If I were a black man I'd be mad as hell with the way the blacks (nigs) are are acting these days,problem is the nigs out number the black folks by a LOT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And if other folks on this board were making the distinction you make, I'd have no issue. But there not. For most, black = n-gger.

True dat.

You want us to believe you had more trouble with white kids than black kids. Is that correct?

Why don't you stop acting like a chick and just figure it is implied unless otherwise stated. I don't think anyone needs to quantify their statements to you every time you might be offended.

Rob is all et up with the bbc.

bbc ???

One of the best jobs I ever had was because of a a nice black lady that worked at her neighborhood community center job referral service.

One of the nicest women I have ever had the honor to meet and I will never forget her. EVER.

As an aside her son is doing life without parole for beating a man to death in a robbery in Pa.

She died of a broken heart and I know she is in heaven

It isn't rocket science at all, and there are good-hearted blacks who work to help all races in need.

https://amandaparmer.wordpress.com/2012/10/17/evelyn-mounts-community-outreach-program-in-reno-nv/

Unfortunately the color of a person's skin seems to be newsworthy. How about this. There are humans on this earth. Some of them are abusive, non-contributing [bleep] that don't care about their neighbor and only look out for number one and take whatever they want from whomever they want whenever they want, regardless of laws. Others care for their neighbors both near and far and try to be helpful, contributing members of a society and seek to help those in need.

ntrue most black skinned folks are acting as nigs now including the president and other high officials and there inlays the problem , race before common sense

What's so hard to believe about that Rich?

Back in college when I was a Scoutmaster, and had minimal parental help, I had a troop that was full of black kids..and most had a two parent home of hard working church attending parents....

I was also a Scoutmaster of another troop at another time, that was full of white kids only... in one of the richest suburban towns around Boston ( Sudbury Mass, where Babe Ruth had a farm back in his days).. these kids also were from two parent homes, but the difference was that both parents were always "professionals"... one parent a doctor or lawyer, and the other either one of those also, or some Upper Level executive with a major firm.... parents who never had time for their kids, but threw a lot of money at them for 'activities' to make up for their guilt about it...

Those were the kids that were the delinquents, and a real pain to deal with....the ones that when they got in trouble, you'd have mom and dad there, ready with an attorney if need be... and the never ending " My Child wouldn't do that!"....

The funny thing was tho, after I won their trust and was there and being consistent with them ( which they had never experienced), they become the biggest discipline nazis in the troop for all the new scouts...

Kids discipline is not so much about skin color as it is about, having parents there and parents who are involved with their kids lives...

doesn't make any difference is dad is gone, or down at the bar drinking.. on one end... and then on the other side of the coin, a dad who is never home, due to working to climb the corporate ladder, or off playing golf all day Saturday 'to unwind'....

kids need their parents, not an empty suit or a shadow that is hardly ever seen...

Nailed it.

Spoiled rich kids are a problem too , most need nurted too and grow up to be lawyers and polititions , more [bleep] heads

I used to be married to one of them naggers. Little white gal about 5'3", the nasty disposition in her came out about the time our first born hit the ground.

Well said.

Thank the millions of White fans that paid his salary.
On behalf of them - You are Welcome

Lame. zzzzzzzzzzzz

That was the case when I taught in a 50-50 integrated school in southern Alabama.

None of my Negro kids gave me any trouble. Ever.

But the Caucasian kids gave me plenty. Every day.

Rob, can you teach the rest of us to read everyone's mind, or is that a special talent only for you? And, not to correct the all knowing, but it is "they're", not "there". Would have thought a mind reader would know that. You sure you're always right?

Christ, some of the crap on this thread is an embarrassment.

Trash comes in all colors.

Other side of the coin?

And one more?

I presume you refer to people calling blacks "n-ggers". I agree. It is embarassing. Wonder why some keep doing it.

He is a fine gentleman of character, as is Dr. Carson, Justice Thomas, and Col. West, to name three.

Seafire,



Did you work in a neighborhood with poor white parents? Were the kids worse than the black kids you referenced?

Did you ever work in a neighborhood with affluent black parents? Where the kids better than the white kids you referenced?

Lets see how many white kids are out rioting, destroying, looting when a black cop shoots a white thug.

Three percent of the US population sexually assaults over 15,000 white women a year. That one about every 30 minutes.

How many white men assault black women per year? < 1

Well actually Rich...

Finishing my growing up years while my dad was overseas in Vietnam, back home in Virginia...and living in various parts of the south growing up, off base as a military dependent...

Yeah, I have been around plenty of places where there were black families that were affluent.. and yes their kids were well mannered...had a focus in life and ambitions...

And definitely grew up around folks that were white and not overly affluent, where they had kids that were much worse than some of the local black juvenile delinquents....

But it still boils down to parental values and involvement with their childrens lives or not...and isn't always tied to how much money the family makes or not...

I've had the good fortune or bad fortune depending on how you look at it, to grow up and being exposed to a wide variety of environments...from the first to the 12th grade, I attended 18 different schools...exposed to a lot of environments and met all types.. family roots are rural and southern.. yet metro DC was considered home... went to college in Boston...so I've been exposed to the big city and hillbilly heaven...

had a friend growing up that was black and his family didn't have the proverbial pot to piss in or window to throw it out of..
parents were not overly well educated, working blue collar jobs and had 15 kids...they were very religious... my mom knew them the best, but education was a major stress in their home... as was Christian values...all 15 of those kids got college degrees, and most of them went on to higher educational degrees, Masters and a PhD or two...

And white kids, who are punks and social pain in the asssses..who came from families with money, do I know any of those...well I have a batch of cousins that fit that bill...

you wonder what trailer park from hell they grew up in... but it wasn't a trailer park... its growing up with parents that were too busy with their own stuff, to be involved in their kids lives...

so no, its not money, its not skin color, its not what religion they might be...its not social status..

Kids grow up a product of their environment, its whether their parents were involved or not...

it was said best by one of my son's teachers over here at Hidden Valley High here in the County...." I always see the parents I really don't need to see because their kids are doing fine, but they show up because they are involved...but I never see the parents of the kids I really need to see, because they can't be bothered...."

I pointed out to him, that as a parent I was aware, that 90% of their time is spent on the 10% of the class that is constantly being disruptive, instead of being able to teach the other 90% who want to learn.... His comment was "BINGO! A parent who actually understands it!"

So what I am saying works out right here in JoCo... yeah, we ain't got a lot of blacks, but substitute all the Mexicans, and you end up with the same thing...

Parental involvement or lack of it, makes all the difference...
not money, lack of it, skin color, ethic origin etc...

Short answer.. Pit Bulls and Golden Retrievers are both breeds of dogs...

Any differences between the two? Both are dogs. Do you think one breed is born with a trait to kill and the other not? Or do you believe one has to train a Pit Bull to do what he does?

They are born the way they are.

You know, if that guy that Rob is trumpeting happened to be gay, Rob would be the first to want him burned at the stake.

It's odd sometimes what folks find to defend and what they rail against.

just off the top of my head Chris Marcy doing time in Seward IIRC on name and place of incarceration.

young 20's white guy robbed and raped and old grandma type up here


funny my mind may have forgotten his exact name and can't be sure where he's incarcerated

what have I haven't forgotten is how sick it made me to think of that old gal getting brutalized and how I could easily have ground the life out of that young punk with my boots.

the color don't matter though, lack of character, oh yeah that matters a heap

I hope you realize when you can't/won't recognize the works of a good black man

you're using the same argument that the liberals use against guns. Lots of guns kill lots of innocents, but it ain't the gun's fault


nor is it the skin's color that determines whether someone is good or bad

Rob, great post!

Is that spook stealing spuds?

mike r

In my high school there were two very pretty black sisters. I believe their father was military. They were always classy dressed and were very well spoken. They didn't hang around the other, shall we say, lower class blacks.

The one in my class was even dating a white dude. A conversation of hers I overheard one day sticks out in my memory. I heard her say to a white girl "I hate that people expect me to act a certain way just because I'm black".

Mr. Rob, that is exactly what you are doing with your post. You don't see a good man doing what he can to help those less fortunate. All you see is a black man doing something you find out of the ordinary for that demographic.

You hoped that by parading this, in your mind, unusual story around you would get a rise out of some lurking raciest on this forum but instead all you accomplished was exposing yourself for the closet raciest that you are.

Maybe one day your kind will realize that good people are good and that trash is trash. Ethnicity does not determine that.

Boom!

Pull your head out of your ass and read the FBI stats on crime. Look at the prison population. Look at the unemployment records, look at the ghettos, look at the countries they came from. DUH. Not all people are created equal as in DNA, kinda like bird dogs and pits. Its a percentage game. The PC bullshit did more to them than for them.

I will agree it's odd [or at least, interesting] what folks defend and what pushes their buttons. Did Rob state that he hates gays?

That'd be an understatement. Rob hates gays, and anyone that might be friendly toward them and doesn't hate them just as much as he does.

Homosexuality is wrong for the same reason chattel slavery and genoicde are wrong. Its not possible to hold to absolute moral principles and condemn slavery (and racial discrimination), for example, without also condemning homosexuality. The Constitution is color blind, or of right, ought to be. However, it is not indifferent to moral distinctions. There is no moral distinction between black and white as there is between male and female. There is no moral basis for denying blacks equal protection of the laws, as there is for denying equal protection to sodomites or their abhorrent practices. Blacks are human beings in the order of nature, but blacks and whites are human beings in that same order of nature---the same nature which condemns homosexuality. Racial discrimination cannot be justified under the Constitution, including the most invidious form of racial discrimination: affirmative action. Discrimination against homosexuals is entirely permissible under the Constitution, properly understood.

That is not the same as saying I hate homosexuals. However, it is fair to infer from my posts that I don't go out of my way to associate with them. I don't care for their political agenda at all; nor do I care to be around them. That said, I've had several clients who were homosexuals and they seemed pleased with my work. I also frequent a business (green house garden supply) owned by two sodomites and we have a friendly, cordial relationship. However, a competing business recently opened in our town by a Mennonite family. I recently told my wife we should be giving all of our business to the Mennonites, unless they don't have what we need to purchase. My reason for doing so is that I would rather enrich the Mennonites than the Sodomites. I think this is entirely consistent with condemning the racism that has been displayed (and excused by so many) on this board.

Jordan

Does your ten commandments say Love thy neighbor except the [bleep]-gets?

Fun thread!

I like the dog analogy. Not all dogs are the same, even though they're all dogs.

I think the same can apply to people. What was it, all people are equal, but some are less equal than others?

Don't take my word for it, the stats are there to support it, as has also been mentioned.

The Bible explicitly condemns homosexuality and therefore implicitly denies any requirement to "love" sodomites, you simplistic dolt.


Jordan

Except for that part where the Bible condones slavery:

Leviticus
However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way. (Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT)

If you buy a Hebrew slave, he is to serve for only six years. Set him free in the seventh year, and he will owe you nothing for his freedom. If he was single when he became your slave and then married afterward, only he will go free in the seventh year. But if he was married before he became a slave, then his wife will be freed with him. If his master gave him a wife while he was a slave, and they had sons or daughters, then the man will be free in the seventh year, but his wife and children will still belong to his master. But the slave may plainly declare, 'I love my master, my wife, and my children. I would rather not go free.' If he does this, his master must present him before God. Then his master must take him to the door and publicly pierce his ear with an awl. After that, the slave will belong to his master forever. (Exodus 21:2-6 NLT)

You are even allowed to sell you own daughter into slavery:

When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she will not be freed at the end of six years as the men are. If she does not please the man who bought her, he may allow her to be bought back again. But he is not allowed to sell her to foreigners, since he is the one who broke the contract with her. And if the slave girl's owner arranges for her to marry his son, he may no longer treat her as a slave girl, but he must treat her as his daughter. If he himself marries her and then takes another wife, he may not reduce her food or clothing or fail to sleep with her as his wife. If he fails in any of these three ways, she may leave as a free woman without making any payment. (Exodus 21:7-11 NLT)

You can beat your slaves, so long as you don't beat them to death:

When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property. (Exodus 21:20-21 NAB)

Jesus even approves of beating your slaves in Luke:

The servant will be severely punished, for though he knew his duty, he refused to do it. "But people who are not aware that they are doing wrong will be punished only lightly. Much is required from those to whom much is given, and much more is required from those to whom much more is given." (Luke 12:47-48 NLT)

LOL! That's friggin hilarious!

[quote=RichardAustin]Does your ten commandments say Love thy neighbor except the [bleep]-gets? [/quote


There were less diverse ethnic groups back them.

I will agree it's odd [or at least, interesting] what folks defend and what pushes their buttons. Did Rob state that he hates gays? [/quote]

That'd be an understatement. Rob hates gays, and anyone that might be friendly toward them and doesn't hate them just as much as he does. [/quote]


Homosexuality is wrong for the same reason chattel slavery and genoicde are wrong. Its not possible to hold to absolute moral principles and condemn slavery (and racial discrimination), for example, without also condemning homosexuality. The Constitution is color blind, or of right, ought to be. However, it is not indifferent to moral distinctions. There is no moral distinction between black and white as there is between male and female. There is no moral basis for denying blacks equal protection of the laws, as there is for denying equal protection to sodomites or their abhorrent practices. Blacks are human beings in the order of nature, but blacks and whites are human beings in that same order of nature---the same nature which condemns homosexuality. Racial discrimination cannot be justified under the Constitution, including the most invidious form of racial discrimination: affirmative action. Discrimination against homosexuals is entirely permissible under the Constitution, properly understood.

That is not the same as saying I hate homosexuals. However, it is fair to infer from my posts that I don't go out of my way to associate with them. I don't care for their political agenda at all; nor do I care to be around them. That said, I've had several clients who were homosexuals and they seemed pleased with my work. I also frequent a business (green house garden supply) owned by two sodomites and we have a friendly, cordial relationship. However, a competing business recently opened in our town by a Mennonite family. I recently told my wife we should be giving all of our business to the Mennonites, unless they don't have what we need to purchase. My reason for doing so is that I would rather enrich the Mennonites than the Sodomites. I think this is entirely consistent with condemning the racism that has been displayed (and excused by so many) on this board.

Jordan[/quote]

Except for that part where the Bible condones slavery:

Leviticus
However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way. (Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT)

If you buy a Hebrew slave, he is to serve for only six years. Set him free in the seventh year, and he will owe you nothing for his freedom. If he was single when he became your slave and then married afterward, only he will go free in the seventh year. But if he was married before he became a slave, then his wife will be freed with him. If his master gave him a wife while he was a slave, and they had sons or daughters, then the man will be free in the seventh year, but his wife and children will still belong to his master. But the slave may plainly declare, 'I love my master, my wife, and my children. I would rather not go free.' If he does this, his master must present him before God. Then his master must take him to the door and publicly pierce his ear with an awl. After that, the slave will belong to his master forever. (Exodus 21:2-6 NLT)

You are even allowed to sell you own daughter into slavery:

When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she will not be freed at the end of six years as the men are. If she does not please the man who bought her, he may allow her to be bought back again. But he is not allowed to sell her to foreigners, since he is the one who broke the contract with her. And if the slave girl's owner arranges for her to marry his son, he may no longer treat her as a slave girl, but he must treat her as his daughter. If he himself marries her and then takes another wife, he may not reduce her food or clothing or fail to sleep with her as his wife. If he fails in any of these three ways, she may leave as a free woman without making any payment. (Exodus 21:7-11 NLT)

You can beat your slaves, so long as you don't beat them to death:

When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property. (Exodus 21:20-21 NAB)

Jesus even approves of beating your slaves in Luke:

The servant will be severely punished, for though he knew his duty, he refused to do it. "But people who are not aware that they are doing wrong will be punished only lightly. Much is required from those to whom much is given, and much more is required from those to whom much more is given." (Luke 12:47-48 NLT)
[/quote]

Slavery was common in antiquity. The Bible does not justify chattel slavery as a positive moral good. It recognizes the existence of and tolerates slavery. The Christian case against slavery, based on the bible, is much more compelling than the anecdotal evidence you have mustered of tolerance for a practice common in the old world.

"That said, I've had several clients who were homosexuals and they seemed pleased with my work".

I have no doubt they walked away happy. :>)

Luke 12: 47-48 does not justify the beating of slaves. It justifies the punishment of servants. Nice try Sniper. Your anti-religious bigotry blinds you to the actual meaning of printed words.

So your position is that God knew Slavery was evil, but decided to tolerate if for 3000 years just because it was "common". If God know slavery was so evil, why not include a simple commandment "Thou shalt not own another human being as property"?

It didn't, it condoned it, which by your own admission is evil, and now you claim there is some tortured excuse proclaiming the Bible doesn't say what it actually says.

I don't know why you are invoking the Bible in a secular discussion about racism. If you want to start a discussion re why you don't believe in the Bible, start a new thread. Not gonna let you hijack this one.

BTW, I take your refusal to respond to my correction of your misrepresentation of Luke as an admission you were wrong.

I did not follow all of this post only the initial thread. Reminds of the story of the millionaire farmer. "I kept farming until I run outta money". Behind every good rancher is a wife who works in town. Best of luck to the Centre: I truly hope he can farm until all 37.5 million is gone, or hopefully he can make a living at it and not go broke.

No, the actual work used in the Greek is Doulos, which translates as slave, not servant, and the Greek speaks of being lashed, or skinned (since lashing commonly removed the skin). Do you think these lashings were for paid servants who could quit, or property, that was owned, that could not quit?

As for your biblical case against slavery, lets here what you have that's stronger then the Bibles direct approval of the institution of slavery.

That part of the Bible was used a lot in Christan churches throughout the land before the Civil War to make everybody sleep better.

Look Troll, if you want to start a thread on why you don't like the Bible or Christianity, have at it. You're not gonna hijack this one.

Troll??

You brought up Homosexuality, Chattel Slavery, and the Bible, not me.

If you want to discover who hijacked this thread I suggest you take a look in the mirror.

There are three discrete communities of Negroes in the United States. I have spent years in close association with two and believe that together they constitute the vast majority of American Negroes.

I have merely observed (from afar, thank you!) the third group � the ghetto Negroes, whom it seems are the only Negroes that the typical Campfire opiner encounters, observes, or considers.

These are the two large communities of American Negroes whom I know, love, and respect �
� Uneducated or barely educated domestics and workers � honest, personable, and responsible � many of whom rear their sons and daughters to become members of the second group.
� Well educated, highly respectable professionals � doctors, lawyers, nurses, mathematicians, chemists, military leaders.

Density of dermal melatonin is not the only characteristic of American Negroes, and it doesn't determine who they are.

The Bible also does NOT condemn slavery...you dolt.

Nice job of misrepresenting Troll. Thankfully we can fact check this thread. I did not raise the issue of homosexuality. Others did and I responded. Nor did I bring up the Bible. Others raised the ten commandments. I responded. So, stop trolling or start your own thread.

Why can't we all be left to decide who we will live with, work with, play with, associate with, worship with, poke, as it's really no ones friggin business but our own..

I hate to have this chit shoved on me with no choice in the matter.


Geo

bwwaaaahha You're the one that invoked the Bible. Personally, I'm a Bible-believing Christian. So I'm not knocking the Bible at all, just advising you of what's in it in a traditional and non-revisionist way.

I believe in taking every man on his own merits...when I know enough about him to know what those are. The problem with all this stuff about good negroes is that it flies in the face of experience. Are there good negroes around? Certainly. Are there a lot of them? Certainly. With 15% of the population being negroid, then that would account for something like 45 million. If only 10% of them are what we'd term "good" then that is a significant number of people. That still leaves enough of them that if I see a bunch of them in hood-rat clothes, shucking and jiving their way down the street towards my family, I am avoiding them if possible. Of course, many here would say that is racism because it is based on color, clothing and superficial behavior. There is a possibility that despite all these things, they are in the "good Negro" category. I know right off though, that 80% of violent crimes are committed by that demographic. I further know that people of that demographic acting and dressing like that make it even more likely that they will cause trouble. IOW, marry your daughter off to OJ if you want, but I will not condone it.

To put it bluntly, you're a crime-enabling, apologistic idiot of Ferguson proportions.

OH, so now you are saying YOU GOT TROLLED, and somehow it's my fault that I responded to your baseless claims regarding the Bible and Slavery?

By now you should be well aware, I do not let such claims go unanswered, and I will respond when and how I wish, and in the thread of my choosing.

If you don't like my responses, feel free to hit the little red X in the top right hand corner of your browser.

I made no baseless claims about the Bible and slavery. You tried to find away to hijack this thread to mount an attack on the Bible, got called on it and now you're sore.

If you want to attack the Bible. Have at it. All you have to do is start your own thread. Don't blame me if I decline to cooperate with your attempt to hijack this one.

I see your revisionism isn't limited to scripture.

I live in a very white community, have all my life.

Due to my very limited dealings with negroes I'm probably far too ignorant on the topic to comment, however the events regarding O.J Simpson, Rodney King, Trayvon Martin, and most recently the events surrounding the thug that robbed the convenience store in Ferguson have had a defining influence regarding how I feel and I will leave it at that...

Liar. Please show where I initiated a discussion on the Bible and slavery in this thread?

Phuqe it; were all condemned by our experiences in life. If we were under fire in one of the many wars the last few generations have gone through we'd all be happy with whoever covered our ass, be they black, white, brown, red, yellow or what ever color/race we want to bitch about Want to bitch about a person's skin color, think about the Jeffrey Damers, Son of Sams, Ed Gueins, and other so called holy white folks before you babble about black people being the ultimate evil. If you hate blacks, or other minorities because they are not white holier than thou, that's your opinion; just remember, it's ONLY your opinon.

lol

I don't hate colored folks, nor do I think they're the ultimate evil. I just speak the truth and if by doing so it makes me "holier than thou" or whatever, then that's just how it is.

[/quote]

Well actually Rich,

Kids grow up a product of their environment, its whether their parents were involved or not...

it was said best by one of my son's teachers over here at Hidden Valley High here in the County...." I always see the parents I really don't need to see because their kids are doing fine, but they show up because they are involved...but I never see the parents of the kids I really need to see, because they can't be bothered...."

I pointed out to him, that as a parent I was aware, that 90% of their time is spent on the 10% of the class that is constantly being disruptive, instead of being able to teach the other 90% who want to learn.... His comment was "BINGO! A parent who actually understands it!"

So what I am saying works out right here in JoCo... yeah, we ain't got a lot of blacks, but substitute all the Mexicans, and you end up with the same thing...

Parental involvement or lack of it, makes all the difference...
not money, lack of it, skin color, ethic origin etc... [/quote]

First thing I've agreed with from you. Plenty of white parental freaks in Oregon, plenty of good Mexican families in Oregon would be where I differ...

Charlie

and as far as racial labels goes, I prefer the ubiquitous label " ASSHOE"...werks

Having introduced the Fire to a negro engaged in growing potatoes I'll remind you to keep an eye on Ferguson, MO over the next few days.. See how many potato farmers are there. Mind if I remind you the day it happens?

Reality check time.

antelope_sniper,



You and I are on the same page so often when it comes to the Bible. It says what It says. Why do these "Christians" deny parts of God's Word? They create a god in their own image rather than accept the God of the Bible.

Words have meaning, and the text says what it says.

Now if we can just get the liberals to understand that about the Constitution.

True that, in England they only do it after football matches

...and IIRC, six Black folks who saw Michael Brown get shot gave pivotal eyewitness testimony to the Grand Jury absolving the Police Officer of wrongdoing.

Birdwatcher

The way I heard it, after we all croak and depart this mortal coil, God will judge us one at a time, on our own merits.

I've always been a firm believer on Dogs, that no matter how much thoroughbred papers or breed they have, they are all still mutts on the inside...

if they can't play with it, piss on it, eat it or screw it, they haven't got much use for it...

Well, if you can catch the 'sickle cell' guess that makes you an "effing N-gger!!"

Probably right Birdwatcher. They got
ignored. Did not fit the agenda.

Ahhhh yes...sickle cell anemia..." The Great White Hope".

Yup, dat plus diabetes and bullets fired 90 degrees off cause that how they come outta da box.

You mean like dis?

LMFAO

Yeah, you can tell it was probably a nog that edit the poster, judging by the spelling....

here's your link, IIRC she was white as well, not that it matters I'd have been just as sick and angry for the way she was treated no matter her race. it appears YMMV
http://touchngo.com/ap/html/ap-1183.htm

Sniper, that's not a reference to the Bible you idiot. Thank you for proving that you are indeed a liar.

Oh really.

From where do you derive your "absolute moral principles"?

Nature, and the law that is in nature.

So, to be absolutely clear, there is no biblical basis for your "absolute moral principles"?

Nice edit above to remove your reference to "Natures God".

The Declaration of Independence teaches that the "laws of nature and of nature's God" are in substantial agreement as to what constitues moral behavior. My argument however was based soley on an appeal to nature and unassisted reason.

How so?

Uh, mainly by being an "effing" idiot, just to bottom-line it for you. Antelope Sniper owns your ass.

Prove it. He falsely claimed I introduced the Bible into this discussion and appealed to Biblical authority to support my argument. I proved that was a lie. He owns nothing but his own idiocy. What's really entertaining though is you wanting to make his idiocy you're own.

You're quite the sycophant EE. Do you have any independent thoughts of your own or does AS do all your thinking for you?

I'm just a sock puppet.

Here is the quote I made earlier, which AS cited as proof I introduced the Bible into this discussion:

"Homosexuality is wrong for the same reason chattel slavery and genoicde are wrong. Its not possible to hold to absolute moral principles and condemn slavery (and racial discrimination), for example, without also condemning homosexuality."

As anyone with the IQ of an ant should be able to see, there is no mention of the Bible anywhere in what I wrote, nor is an appeal to the Bible even implied. AS falsely claimed the Bible as the source of my absolute moral principles because, as an atheist, he was looking for an opportunity to attack Biblical religion.

Now he's mad that I exposed his ignorance---and you two (EE and ADD) are falling all over yourselves trying to join him in the "stupid" club.

Congratulations on your inability to have an independent thought of your own.

I think most people knowing your past history would assume that you derived the morality you were speaking of from the Bible. I suspect you're switching to talking about it coming from someplace else simply to win an internet pissing match where you're sorely outmatched. Like most mol callout threads, this one was stupid from the get-go. Keep gloating over your self-proclaimed "win", it only makes you look more foolish the more you type.

Jeeze, are you for real? You misrepresent the argument and then complain I'm gloating when I set you straight? Do a search and show us a single instance where I've made an argument on this site grounded solely on an appeal to the Bible or Biblical religion. Good luck with that because it's never happened. Stop pulling stuff out of your arse and claiming that its factual.

If you're gonna start thinking for yourself, instead of letting AS or others do it for you, then you ought to crack a book or two first; maybe give a little thought to understanding the issues before you dive into water that's way over your head.


Jordan

You suffered an intellectual beatdown. You might as well just move on. Starting the whole thread was a bad idea in the first place, but I doubt this will teach you a lesson. I could explain it to you, but you'd just keep trying to parse your way out of it. But hey, keep on truckin'...

Just for reference, since Rob is being disingenuous about the origins of his hatred:

Homosexuality in Nature -

Yale Scientific report: http://www.yalescientific.org/2012/03/do-animals-exhibit-homosexuality/

National Geographic commentary: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/07/0722_040722_gayanimal_2.html

NYT reporting on a study of albatross: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/04/magazine/04animals-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

For additional reference, since Rob brought up the US Constitution and slavery, how about Article I, Section 2, Paragraph 2, first line:



Oh, and Article IV, Section 2, paragraph 3?



And now, Rob, in his own words, here: http://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/ubb/showflat/Number/9238771

There are plenty others where Rob actually admits where his rationale comes from, and it's a religious belief system that - perish the thought - also condoned the same slavery that he said it didn't and couldn't. Twisting a religion and it's history to suit one's own agenda? Naw, that's never happened before, has it?

So the effing N-gger in the potato patch is a homosexual?

By potato patch you mean White House? Yes.

No, that effing N-ggeress had her sweet potatoes hauled in after claiming to grow them..

that was nicely played

very good point

this is supposed to be a "free" country

but freedom's last bastion is that six inch place between our ears

so basically anyone and everyone is free to think what they want


you can hate pitbulls

or guns

or people of color

or racists


or whatever suits you


you're free to build whatever type of prison you want in your own mind

-------------------------------------------------------------
Eistein ,

There's a HUGE difference between all races and blacks - as for whites we don't squall that jeffrey damer / ed gueins etc. were railroaded - persecuted because they're white .
No matter what a negroid does -his negroid people will side with him/her .

Utterly and completely false 4ager. I'll respond with a point-by-point refutation later today.

utter and complete bullchit, you got sloppy when you tried to paint with too broad of a brush


the "negroid" or black folks that share similar values with other folks that believe in hard work, education and a sense of moral decency aren't out there cheering on the criminal element of their own race, they're as happy to have them removed from society as most other folks.


but racism is alive and well in this country


many here cheered on the armed folks that turned away Fed authorities (me included) on the Bundy ranch (even though I'm not certain he was in the right)

take the same number of folks with the same number of arms and make them black folks

and at least some here would be calling for the Nat'l guard to remove them from the face of the earth


America where all men are deemed to be created equal?

that doesn't turn a blind eye to the post that EE made, it was spot on


but there's a difference between an honest black man working hard and trying to instill values of merit to his offspring

and all the welfare leaching scum our gov't has created with their programs designed with the intent to help people in need that have largely created a needy people

you put out food for rats, you're apt to get more rats

you reward irresponsible behavior......I'll leave the conclusion to you

Not that it matters ?? hmmmmmmm,. we have nlggers raping elderly white women but you're not providing links to white cracker mo fos raping elderly women of color.

Your effort in finding the above link was for naught. JMHO LOL

I'm sure his intentions are well placed but to put him on a pedestal to block racial commentary here is ludicrous.

The 45,000 pounds of sweet potatoes as well as the 10,000 pounds of cucumbers are barely 4-5 tractor trailer loads and won't go far in feeding the masses. He'd be better off with some loaves of bread and fishes but the heavenly connection is missing.

I'm sure you got all warm and fuzzing posting your stupid thread.

TFF

Oh, please do. I can't wait for you to refute what the Yale scientists observed and reported on in one of the oldest peer reviewed scientific journals in the US. Equally so, it'll be fascinating to know how the Constitution didn't actually say what it said. Those will rank up there with you trying to convince yourself (as no one else is going to buy it) that you didn't say what you actually said.

Eventually, I'll take your positions apart on each point, but I'm a little busy right now living my life.

So much time and energy spent on a two bit subject.

Those that oppose slavery are the same ones that fear they will be enslaved. All the while their PC government is working day and night to enslave them.

Welfare was never meant to be an entitlement, it has become that and has enslaved more of the blacks than any other race. Democrats live on a promise, the rest live on a dream. Pick your poison carefully.

Boy, after reading some of these posts, I'm so happy I wasn't raised by trash.

so it not only matters to you what color the criminal is, but the victim as well?


whatever floats your boat brudda


I'm just glad mine is in a different body of water

After reading this thread and RobJordans original post all I have to say to the racebaiting POS OP is GFY over and over again

RJ <crickets> I think after getting his A$$ handed to him, he's recouping.

And another last night. This one a 12 year old, shot dead.

There are some folks here like Rob, Kevin Gibson and others, who like to feel they are above us "racist crackers" by blowing on like a bunch of white suburbanites riddled with white guilt-which they pretty much are. Such angst simply consciously ignores the facts and plays into the myth of whitey keepin' the black man down. That's what this whole Ferguson thing is about and it's a microcosm of what America has become during O's tenure as pretend-President.

When it comes down to it, how many of us are really "free" anyway? It's hard to be free if you don't even own the ground you lay your head on at night and it's hard to actually own the ground you're on if there are annual taxes due. That makes a person more of a tenant than an "owner". I won't even go into how many people really work for the ultra rich and what constitutes slavery in the post-modern world.

You only "own" ground by buying the rights to it from the previous "owner" then doing an annual LEASE from the government

That's a FACT

"effing N-ggers!!"

Well....you got the title right!

robjordan: For your information ANYONE stupid enough to live in kalifornicopia is automatically disqualified from giving advice to ANYONE!
Sheesh
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy