Home
However, a grand jury has to decide whether to press charges against the cop. If it's a homicide and they know who did it, how can they NOT file charges?

Death of 12-year-old Cleveland boy shot by police ruled a homicide
Published December 12, 2014
Associated Press

CLEVELAND � A 12-year-old boy carrying a pellet gun died from a single shot fired by a rookie police officer, according to an autopsy released Friday.

Tamir Rice was shot in the abdomen and the bullet damaged a major vein and his intestines, the Cuyahoga County Medical Examiner concluded in labeling the death a homicide.

Tamir was shot outside a city recreation center on Nov. 22 after officers responded to a 911 call about someone with a gun at a playground. Surveillance video released by police shows the boy being shot within 2 seconds of a patrol car stopping near him. He died the next day.

Police have said rookie officer Tim Loehmann believed the boy had a real firearm. They later discovered it was an airsoft gun, which shoots nonlethal plastic projectiles.

Tamir's mother, Samaria Rice, said at a news conference earlier this week her son's friend gave him the pellet gun.

A grand jury will consider whether charges are merited.

The autopsy said Tamir was 5-foot-7 and weighed 195 pounds. The report did not say how long it took officers to provide medical help.

A federal lawsuit filed by the boy's family against the city and police said two officers waited four minutes before anyone provided medical help to Tamir.

The lawsuit also said the two officers acted recklessly when they confronted Tamir in a terrifying manner, driving within feet of him and firing within seconds. Samaria Rice said the officer who fired the fatal shot should be convicted of a crime.

The officer's father has said his son had no other choice because he thought the weapon was real.

Several peaceful protests have taken place since the shooting, which has come at a time when police-involved deaths around the nation have drawn on spotlight on departments and their use of force.

Last week, the U.S. Justice Department released the results of a nearly two-year investigation of Cleveland police that found its officers use excessive and unnecessary force far too often. The report was completed before Tamir's death.
Why not? The definition of homicide is a human death caused by another human
Originally Posted by gitem_12
Why not? The definition of homicide is a human death caused by another human


Yeah but he was black.
Toot Toot!

I think a railroad is coming!
Isn't the legal definition of Homicide just that an individual has been killed by another individual.?

I don't think it passes any judgement.
The autopsy said Tamir was 5-foot-7 and weighed 195 pounds.

Pushing 200lbs at 12 years old?
He also had what was easily been mistaken for a real gun. I figured they'd call it justified and that would be the end of it.
Not having a problem seeing the dufis cop going to the big house on that one.
It could be ruled justifiable homicide, in which case the cop walks.
Yeah, every one of these deaths have been homicides, but none have had a grand jury find reasonable cause to believe a crime had been committed. Considering the total lack of time between cop getting out of car and cop shooting, this one may be different.
Google "justifiable homicide".
Originally Posted by Deerwhacker444
Isn't the legal definition of Homicide just that an individual has been killed by another individual.?

I don't think it passes any judgement.


Yeah but you see, and I am reiterating here, he was black.

Everyone stop and read this, he was black.

Rules, common sense, reasoning, deduction, or critical thought need not apply, he was black for God sakes, BLACK.
I know what it is, I wasn't saying any of the findings up to now were wrong.

Don't think grand juries pass a finding of justifiable homicide, though, do they? They just no bill it.
the friggen driver is most culpable. why the hell would he pull right in on the kid? the passenger had almost zero time to process the situation.
Originally Posted by rem141r
the friggen driver is most culpable. why the hell would he pull right in on the kid? the passenger had almost zero time to process the situation.


Yep, Barney Fife and Roscoe P. Coltrane together at last. If it was a real thug with a real gun, he could have gotten his partner's head blown off.
Originally Posted by rem141r
the friggen driver is most culpable. why the hell would he pull right in on the kid? the passenger had almost zero time to process the situation.

He probably didn't realize who it was, or maybe didn't even see him
this one is reality, Cop has split second to make a decision, if gun pointed toward cop he simply had to make a decision, shoot or get shot in his mind, the driver should not have pulled as close, he put the rookie cop at risk.
The 911 operator needs to be charged with accessory to the murder. She was responsible for spooling up the two cops with a misleading radio call which failed to present eyewitness testimony that the kids "gun" was probably "fake" (a toy.)

What do you suppose would or should happen to the 911 operator if he/she was to relay to the cops that the gun was probably fake, the cops went in assuming as much and one of them or worse a bystander got killed, all because the 911 operator gave them information that she had no way of verifying.

These people don't live in the hindsight like we all have the privilege of doing after we read this stuff on the campfire. They make decisions in the hear and now and live with them. Charging someone with murder for not telling the police the gun might be fake is just ridiculous.
The police have to react as though all guns in a situation are real, until proven otherwise:

Police in San Leandro, California, announced they confiscated two AK-pattern rifles during a drug raid that were built with orange-tipped muzzles to make them look like toy or airsoft rifles.

Three other rifles were confiscated from the house along with $45,000 in cash. The house was being used as an illegal marijuana farm.

Three men were arrested in the raid.

Lt. Robert McManus confirmed that the rifles were authentic and not toys.

�The officer is going to be forced to shoot to protect their own life or to protect someone else, regardless if it has the plastic tip on it,� McManus said, implying his department treats all potential firearms as guns no matter how they are painted.

This follows on the heels of a bill proposed by state Sen. Noreen Evans that would regulate toy guns and require them to have paint schemes to differentiate between real and toy guns.

The bill was proposed after shooting death Andy Lopez, 13, in October last year. Lopez was shot and killed by a Erick Gelhaus, a Sonoma County sheriff�s deputy.

If what McManus says is true, this bill will not change how police approach potentially-armed standoffs.
Point a real or real looking gun at a cop (or a citizen with a CCW), and you DAMNED well ought to expect to get shot.

Originally Posted by heavywalker
Originally Posted by gitem_12
Why not? The definition of homicide is a human death caused by another human


Yeah but he was black.



I understand what you're saying. But what i'm getting at is "homicide" is a clinical term. T
The old saying is all murders are homicides, but not all homicides are murders.

The media, IMO uses the terms interchanabky to generate ratings and rile people up

The simple fact is the ME is going to list any death caused by another himan as a homicide
Originally Posted by gitem_12
I understand what you're saying. But what i'm getting at is "homicide" is a clinical term.
The old saying is all murders are homicides, but not all homicides are murders.

The media, IMO uses the terms interchangeably to generate ratings and rile people up

The simple fact is the ME is going to list any death caused by another human as a homicide.


Bingo.
That kid needed to be shot! The "parents" are to blame for the kids death.
Originally Posted by gitem_12
Originally Posted by heavywalker
Originally Posted by gitem_12
Why not? The definition of homicide is a human death caused by another human


Yeah but he was black.



I understand what you're saying. But what i'm getting at is "homicide" is a clinical term. T
The old saying is all murders are homicides, but not all homicides are murders.

The media, IMO uses the terms interchanabky to generate ratings and rile people up

The simple fact is the ME is going to list any death caused by another himan as a homicide


Absolutely the legal definition (blacks law) of homicide is the death of a person caused by another person. (Paraphrased).

Pretty simple and does not define intent. It is the only way that the ME could rule the death. That some are surprised by this is disturbing. And that some think this is a condemnation of the officer is stupidity on another level.
Originally Posted by OrangeOkie
The 911 operator needs to be charged with accessory to the murder. She was responsible for spooling up the two cops with a misleading radio call which failed to present eyewitness testimony that the kids "gun" was probably "fake" (a toy.)


That's silly
What difference does it make if someone said "probably fake" when it could just have easily been real

Originally Posted by Foxbat
Originally Posted by rem141r
the friggen driver is most culpable. why the hell would he pull right in on the kid? the passenger had almost zero time to process the situation.


Yep, Barney Fife and Roscoe P. Coltrane together at last. If it was a real thug with a real gun, he could have gotten his partner's head blown off.


This sure contributed to the FUBAR.
Originally Posted by gitem_12
Why not? The definition of homicide is a human death caused by another human


I'm not a lawyer, but that's my understanding. It can be justifiable (certainly warranted in this case - point a real-looking gun at a cop and there ARE consequences) or non-justifiable (if the cop acted in an unwarranted fashion, which I doubt). I just hope common sense prevails.
Police in San Leandro, California, announced they confiscated two AK-pattern rifles during a drug raid that were built with orange-tipped muzzles to make them look like toy or airsoft rifles.

What kind of [bleep] would want an orange gun anyway?
[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by heavywalker
Originally Posted by gitem_12
Originally Posted by heavywalker
Originally Posted by gitem_12
Why not? The definition of homicide is a human death caused by another human


Yeah but he was black.



I understand what you're saying. But what i'm getting at is "homicide" is a clinical term. T
The old saying is all murders are homicides, but not all homicides are murders.

The media, IMO uses the terms interchanabky to generate ratings and rile people up

The simple fact is the ME is going to list any death caused by another himan as a homicide


Absolutely the legal definition (blacks law) of homicide is the death of a person caused by another person. (Paraphrased).

Pretty simple and does not define intent. It is the only way that the ME could rule the death. That some are surprised by this is disturbing. And that some think this is a condemnation of the officer is stupidity on another level.


Heavy, you are really starting to step into it with your comments. Not hardly worth the time to respond, but thought I was give you my opinion based on your faulty logic.
Originally Posted by Snyper
Originally Posted by OrangeOkie
The 911 operator needs to be charged with accessory to the murder. She was responsible for spooling up the two cops with a misleading radio call which failed to present eyewitness testimony that the kids "gun" was probably "fake" (a toy.)


That's silly
What difference does it make if someone said "probably fake" when it could just have easily been real



She just needed to tell the officers "exactly" what the eye witness had said to her, then perhaps Barney and Coltrane would not have been so hyperventilated as they roared up to the gazebo and jumped out guns a blazing, killing a young 12-year old boy with a toy gun.
Originally Posted by Snyper
Originally Posted by OrangeOkie
The 911 operator needs to be charged with accessory to the murder. She was responsible for spooling up the two cops with a misleading radio call which failed to present eyewitness testimony that the kids "gun" was probably "fake" (a toy.)


That's silly
What difference does it make if someone said "probably fake" when it could just have easily been real



i would put this in the "providing all info available" category. it should have been relayed to the officers and they would have had much more time to process that info than the 2 seconds they had after they rolled up on the kid. 911 op was not saying it WAS a fake gun, only that the caller said it might be. pretty damned important info to relay IMO.
Originally Posted by rem141r
the friggen driver is most culpable. why the hell would he pull right in on the kid? the passenger had almost zero time to process the situation.


Here's what I think might have happened.

First, it's not customary or SOP to pull up next to a suspect. If you look at the video you can see the patrol car driving on the grass and I don't think the cops knew where the "suspect" was when the driver pulled into the park. When he drove by the gazebo the cop on the passenger side saw a suspect and yelled "Stop".

I heard a LE supervisor say the cop told the kid three times to "Show me your hands". Maybe the kid only heard the "show me" and lifted up his shirt to show the cop his gun.

I'm not saying this is what happened but it is a plausible explanation for what might have occurred.
perhaps. i would say that the shooter did not have the time to say it 3 times though. unless he was one of those guys who list all the side effects of a medication immediately before the commercial.
Originally Posted by rem141r
perhaps. i would say that the shooter did not have the time to say it 3 times though. unless he was one of those guys who list all the side effects of a medication immediately before the commercial.


That's possible too. Maybe the cop only said "Show me your hands" once, it wasn't clear to the kid, and therefore the fatal misunderstanding.
Originally Posted by wallypip
Police in San Leandro, California, announced they confiscated two AK-pattern rifles during a drug raid that were built with orange-tipped muzzles to make them look like toy or airsoft rifles.

What kind of [bleep] would want an orange gun anyway?
[Linked Image]


I dunno, you tell me.... grin

[Linked Image]
i'm diggin' it vic. in a "i don't want to" kind of way.
Quote
She just needed to tell the officers "exactly" what the eye witness had said to her, then perhaps Barney and Coltrane would not have been so hyperventilated as they roared up to the gazebo and jumped out guns a blazing, killing a young 12-year old boy with a toy gun.


"Exactly" what he said was he DIDNT KNOW if it was a real gun.

They also didn't know it was a "12 year old"
He was big enough to be an adult, so don't play the "poor little child" BS.

They were also told he was "on a swingset" so they had no reason to think that was him in the gazebo:
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/tamir-rice-shooting-cleveland-police-under-investigation-n254716

Quote
A man who called 911 told dispatchers the boy was on a swing set and pointing a pistol that was "probably fake"



12 year olds can kill you as quickly as anyone
Originally Posted by fish head
Originally Posted by rem141r
perhaps. i would say that the shooter did not have the time to say it 3 times though. unless he was one of those guys who list all the side effects of a medication immediately before the commercial.


That's possible too. Maybe the cop only said "Show me your hands" once, it wasn't clear to the kid, and therefore the fatal misunderstanding.


Makes no difference to the LEO defenders in this thread. Notice how many of 'em say something like;" If you point a gun at a cop...." when it is OBVIOUS that this kid wasn't pointing a gun at them.
Quote
Makes no difference to the LEO defenders in this thread. Notice how many of 'em say something like;" If you point a gun at a cop...." when it is OBVIOUS that this kid wasn't pointing a gun at them.

No one in their right mind is going to wait until someone points the gun at them IF they think it's a real gun.

There was no REAL reason to think it wasn't

I'm not "defending the LEO"
I'm just going by the facts

I'd have shot "the kid" as some like to call him

At 200 lbs he's bigger than I am


© 24hourcampfire