Home
You run into all sorts that were Seals, Special forces.

What should they do to this guy, a gubbermint worker bee that lied?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...tedly-admits-lying-about-special-forces/
1. Send him through Seal training, with no option to quit.

2. Bury his dead ass.

3. Get a new VA Secretary, one who can tell the truth.
If he had honor, he would voluntarily resign his post.

Since he already proved that he does not, he will simply carry-on enjoying the benefits of a govt job.
Nothing really new. My dad was a WW-2 vet. He pointed out to me at least 30 years ago that in Europe for every soldier carrying a rifle there were 8-10 soldiers in support roles that never saw combat. I saw recently that in the Pacific the ratio was 18:1 since supply lines were so long and complex.

The odd thing he said, was that since the war he had never met another veteran who worked in a support role. All claimed to be combat veterans. What are the odds of that?

Dad by the way was attached to a medical unit. He never fired a shot, but did drive an ambulance up to the front lines to pick up wounded and bring them to hospitals in the rear.
Quote
Since he already proved that he does not, he will simply carry-on enjoying the benefits of a govt job.


I know that this is the Feds, but I worked for the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department. It was found that the 2nd highest paid person in the Department lied about Her education, on Her paperwork when She hired on. She was fired immediately, and She just lacked 2 years having enough to retire. This is 28, at any age. In the paperwork that you fill out and sign, when you hire on, it states that you will be fired if any of this is found to be untrue. I would have thought that they would find a way around it given her years and position, but they did not. miles
I'd be more concerned about him lying about firing 60 employees at the VA, when he didn't.
I remember the 60 minutes piece on the guy.

Before you bury him for lying, I would consider what he is trying to do and who he is trying to do it for - he was tasked from the private sector as an executive from Proctor and Gamble to right the ship. He's a West Point grad as well

He's fired over 35 people in the VA scandal, and has pushed for new technology to support vets like the exoskeleton that enables paralyzed veterans to walk

If he gets fired for lying, OK but he's genuinely dedicated to helping veterans. He is far from a government worker bee.
Originally Posted by ltppowell
I'd be more concerned about him lying about firing 60 employees at the VA, when he didn't.


now if that's a lie, then yea, Houston we have a problem.


I did find this reading up on him...................

"McDonald, a former Procter & Gamble CEO with no experience in the worlds of government or medicine, will presumably lean heavily into his managerial skills to make the changes he wants to execute. He estimates that as many as 1,000 employees may need to be fired for violating the VA’s values of “integrity,…advocacy,…respect,…[and] excellence.”

60 Minutes spoke with Secretary of Veterans Affairs Bob McDonald about his efforts to solve the systemic problems that led to a healthcare scandal.

However, terminating a government employee is much more elaborate than McDonald’s personnel decisions in the corporate world. Since in each situation a case for firing must be presented to an administrative judge, many employees were put on administrative leave to prevent them from doing further harm to the veterans they are supposed to serve."
I carry a set of dog tags in my wallet. They were my godfather's. He was a WWII vet who'd been in the United States Army Air Corps. I can remember, as a kid, in the fifties, asking what he'd done in the war. Dick would just smile and say, "Not much, I was just a test pilot." After he died, I came into his "stuff," including his military records; test pilot my azz. I don't know the number off the top of my head, but it's an extraordinary number of combat missions in the South Pacific. I guess he figured he could get away with saying he was a "test pilot" by virtue of the fact that he was his squadron's maintenance officer and thus must have "test flown" aircraft after repairs and maintenance work.

Two of my uncles had ships shot out from under them and one, (the black sheep who joined the Army) was in the Battle of the Bulge." I didn't find out any of this from them. My father was the youngest brother and my grandmother wouldn't let him quit high school to go in the service. By the time he got to Guam, the shooting had stopped (there.) He always regretted that, but never claimed otherwise. On my mother's side, her stepbrothers were decorated combat veterans, but as a kid, being taken fishing with them and spending time at camp with them, I never knew anything about it, never found out until after their deaths.

That's how that generation was.
Originally Posted by Theo Gallus
1. Send him through Seal training, with no option to quit.

2. Bury his dead ass.

3. Get a new VA Secretary, one who can tell the truth.

Maybe have Jesse Ventura have a talk with him?
Originally Posted by KFWA
Originally Posted by ltppowell
I'd be more concerned about him lying about firing 60 employees at the VA, when he didn't.


now if that's a lie, then yea, Houston we have a problem.


I did find this reading up on him...................

"McDonald, a former Procter & Gamble CEO with no experience in the worlds of government or medicine, will presumably lean heavily into his managerial skills to make the changes he wants to execute. He estimates that as many as 1,000 employees may need to be fired for violating the VA’s values of “integrity,…advocacy,…respect,…[and] excellence.”

60 Minutes spoke with Secretary of Veterans Affairs Bob McDonald about his efforts to solve the systemic problems that led to a healthcare scandal.

However, terminating a government employee is much more elaborate than McDonald’s personnel decisions in the corporate world. Since in each situation a case for firing must be presented to an administrative judge, many employees were put on administrative leave to prevent them from doing further harm to the veterans they are supposed to serve."


____

"Mr. McDonald said on NBC this month that 60 people had been fired for their part in the misconduct, but the fact-checking website PolitiFact.com rated his statement as “false,” saying that fewer than 20 had been dismissed and that others had been disciplined.

The V.A. acknowledged that Mr. McDonald’s claim that his department has “fired” 60 people was incorrect.

“Regarding the 60 figure, it is most accurate to say that ‘V.A. has proposed disciplinary action related to data manipulation or patient care against more than 60 employees nationwide,’ ” an official said. That includes “the full range of accountability actions including admonishments, demotions, reprimands and termination.”


http://www.nytimes.com/politics/fir...s-for-embellishing-military-record/?_r=0
If any part of this administration is talking you can bet on one thing..


They are lying.
To be a combat veteran you have to meet criteria. It doesn't mean you have to be combat arms i.e. Infantry et.al. I know an NBC specialist who burned lice infested uniforms on Grenada and is a combat veteran and entitled to wear a combat patch despite never shooting or being shot at. I also know of a female Intelligence officer - Captain who didn't see a shot in Grenada but was also authorized to wear a combat patch. In the same operation there were Infantrymen who did receive fire but did not receive the CIB and were not entitled to wear a combat patch as they were not in a designated zone at the time.

During many occasions truck drivers, cooks and others were given a rifle and sent to the front lines to fight.

As to the current VA Secretary, when you have a trust issue already do you really want someone who has "trust problems"? There is no one else with the business acumen to do the job? Or maybe it is that there is no one else who is willing to conform to the administration and "do the job".
Originally Posted by mauser416
To be a combat veteran you have to meet criteria. It doesn't mean you have to be combat arms i.e. Infantry et.al. I know an NBC specialist who burned lice infested uniforms on Grenada and is a combat veteran and entitled to wear a combat patch despite never shooting or being shot at. I also know of a female Intelligence officer - Captain who didn't see a shot in Grenada but was also authorized to wear a combat patch. In the same operation there were Infantrymen who did receive fire but did not receive the CIB and were not entitled to wear a combat patch as they were not in a designated zone at the time.

During many occasions truck drivers, cooks and others were given a rifle and sent to the front lines to fight.

As to the current VA Secretary, when you have a trust issue already do you really want someone who has "trust problems"? There is no one else with the business acumen to do the job? Or maybe it is that there is no one else who is willing to conform to the administration and "do the job".


The world is crazy. My nephew, the Marine, got shot at more while in Haiti than he did in Fallujah. But he awards/recognition system isn't that precise. There are a lot of people who do not get the recognition they earned. But most just carry on.

Top 2%of his class at W.P. and a Captain in the 82nd Airborne (5yrs.) He may have done some training w/S.F. Jus sayin.
Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Top 2%of his class at W.P. and a Captain in the 82nd Airborne (5yrs.) He may have done some training w/S.F. Jus sayin.
He acknowledged it as a lie but the Whitehouse said it was ok because he didn't mean to lie. They understand such things with a nuance that most aren't privliged to.
brian williams will back him up.....
Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Top 2%of his class at W.P. and a Captain in the 82nd Airborne (5yrs.)

He had admirable service. Why the need to lie about it?
He actually did not admit to lying about his service.

Emphasis mine:
Originally Posted by VA Sec McDonald
In a statement released Monday by the VA, McDonald said: "While I was in Los Angeles, engaging a homeless individual to determine his veteran status, I asked the man where he had served in the military. He responded that he had served in special forces. I incorrectly stated that I had been in special forces. That was inaccurate and I apologize to anyone that was offended by my misstatement."


It's as if Marie Harf or Jen Psaki wrote the statement for him.

It's "too nuanced".
He was only trying to bond with a vet--- what is the concern?
Can't anybody up there tell the TRUTH???!!!

As far as being in "combat" goes, after El Dorado Canyon ( Mohammar's first midnight wake up; actually about 0200 IIRC), a DOD message was sent out to all three Airwings involved that essentially directed that "there will be NO, repeat NO mention of 'combat' in Officer Fitreps or correspondence and there will be NO green ink used to signify combat time in personal flight log books for any flights regardless of ordnance expended, hostile fire or support role."

Pure politics I guess...
Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Top 2%of his class at W.P. and a Captain in the 82nd Airborne (5yrs.) He may have done some training w/S.F. Jus sayin.


I happen to know Bob personally and have worked with him. Let me put a little context on this.

First of all, I know him to be extremely patriotic, religiously devout, talented and hard working. Most who have worked with him love him. I did not work at P&G. He and I were officers of the American Chamber of Commerce in Osaka together for several years and I was one of the two who convinced him to serve, despite his very busy work, family and church commitments.

Coming out of running a major business, he cannot be expected to do things the inside DC or political way. I guarantee that the knives are out to take advantage of any misstep. He is a guy that is very talented and can do the VA job -- if anyone can.

Dealing with the press and with the hatred even within one party is another thing. Remember, he is a Republican working within a Democratic Administration. He gets it from both sides.

In trying to bond with a homeless vet, he said he was also in special forces. He never deployed in special forces, but he did get through Ranger training. In that regard, he did have a connection. He should not have misspoken, but he has corrected it and apologized. Who knows, they probably had other plans for him. I happen to know that A.G. Lafley of P&G personally recruited him and begged him to work there, so he makes an impression as a real talent.

He has an awfully important job to do. I hope he can. The VA needs it. In DC, most people seem to wish for failure by others. Let's give him a chance -- or do you think someone else can do it better?
So it's ok for a guy with his stature and upbringing to perjure himself counselor? Sure looked condescending in the vid to lie to a poor vet sitting in garbage. Looks like his PR stunt back fired on him. Maybe he and the Mrs. should invite the homeless vet over for a shower, shave and dinner. Maybe tell Special Forces stories after dinner with a brandy and cigar? Never happen.

If he really wanted a valid PR stunt he should've gone to the VA in Tomah WI and kicked the doctors in their ass's that over medicated Vets with opiates.
Quote
Let me put a little context on this.
Your context has little fit in light of his claims of firing 60 with another 1000 likely in wake of the VA contributing to the deaths of dozens of vets, when none of that was true. I'm sure he's all you say he is as are many successful people, but you also need to add liar to the list. In that, I'd say he has mastered the DC way of doing things quite well, to the detriment of the country.
Originally Posted by wildbill59
You run into all sorts that were Seals, Special forces.

What should they do to this guy, a gubbermint worker bee that lied?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...tedly-admits-lying-about-special-forces/


fuggin dink.
© 24hourcampfire