[quote=sawbuck] I
I never understood why people get so worked up over bore sighting a rifle, you can accomplish the same thing with one shot.
To reiterate/expand on a previously posted point: IF you know the rifle
/load is accurate, and IF you don't screw up the shot somehow, this works fine. But me being me, I prefer taking 3 shot groups, finding the center-point of each group, and adjusting the scope hairs using that center-point mark at both 25 and 100 yards. And sometimes at other ranges, especially longer ones. I concur that 50 yards is good check for a "rainbow" gun. A point in case below.
I once used a Win 1200 smoothbore with single front bead on a moose hunt, that being all I had available at a remotefish-counting site. I had it and 00Buck for bear medicine, but didn't deem that suitable for a moose. I bought out the little Bush store's (15 miles downstream) stock of slugs on a produce run- all 10 rounds of them. Used a 10-15 foot high, 6-8 inch diameter flood-washed spruce bole with root-wad for a target. Stood that thing up on it's root-wad, fired one round each at 25,50,75,100, 150 yards, nailing the trunk each time.
IIRC (from 1981) there was about 5 feet elevation difference from 25 to 150, with anything out to 75 yards being minute-of-moose/hold on hair. But I was confident I could kill any moose out to 150 yards with the right shot presentation, as I now knew the elevation holds.
Took the other 5 slugs hunting the next day, using one to down a running yearling (15 mo) old fork-horn at about 35 yards. (just swing thru from behind!!!
) I'd been scouting him, a 50 inch, and one about 65 for several weeks - he just happened to be the first one along, and big enough to feed the wife and I for a year. Heckuva lot easier to handle too.
That shotgun is under my bed here right now, and I may even have one or more of those original slugs in the home stash on the Kenai, along with several other better/worse shotguns...