Question,,, Why don't they show the number of Democrat votes?? They are showing total number for ea.candidate,are the numbers that low they don't want to show totals??
Question,,, Why don't they show the number of Democrat votes?? They are showing total number for ea.canidate,are the numbers that low they don't want to show totals??
They just did.
Rubio is right in the mix. He may just pull ahead of this one.
If Rubio becomes the Nominee, and wins the General Election, y'all better get ready for a swarm of illegals to swim the Rio Grande like we've never seen before.
If Rubio becomes the Nominee, and wins the General Election, y'all better get ready for a swarm of illegals to swim the Rio Grande like we've never seen before.
If Rubio becomes the Nominee, and wins the General Election, y'all better get ready for a swarm of illegals to swim the Rio Grande like we've never seen before.
Yawn. Call me after South Carolina. That will tell you who the top 2 are.
Quote
Past Iowa Caucus Winners: Who Has Gone On To Win The Nomination, Presidency? 01/03/2012 06:59 pm ET What do Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush and Ronald Reagan have in common?
These former presidents all lost in the Iowa caucuses, but won their party's nomination and, of course, the subsequent general elections.
What about Mike Huckabee, Dick Gephardt and Tom Harkin? They came in first in Iowa but failed to become their party's standard-bearer.
Iowa has always chosen its presidential candidates using caucuses, but the caucuses didn't achieve the significance currently attributed to them until 1972, when the Democratic Party moved the contest to the beginning of the year.
Since then, however, only three non-incumbent candidates who won Iowa have gone on to win the presidency.
Sending the message I was looking to see. Time to see a few of the less popular candidates to drop out of the race and see where they may throw their votes. The top three runners are fairly tight. Will be interesting to see what will happen when the other 25 percent or so, of the vote is allotted to the candidates that truly have a realistic chance in this race.
Off to a great start from my perspective!
Cant get over some of the damaging statments delivered by one of these guys.
(My people wont break away even if I were to shoot somone)
Of course this is early and voters have the opportunity to become more educated in the months to come.
If Rubio becomes the Nominee, and wins the General Election, y'all better get ready for a swarm of illegals to swim the Rio Grande like we've never seen before.
Sure hope CRUZ can pull ahead and beat them all.
You better F'in believe it. He'll owe so much payola down here, it's not even funny.
Yawn. Call me after South Carolina. That will tell you who the top 2 are.
SC will go Rubio or maybeeeeeee Cruz. You heard it here
Hoop, you need to be educating your fellow constituents about Rub's politics. He's a sweet talkin sob, but he's establishment all the way. And we won't need a fence if he's elected. They'll just be driving through the front door.
For the Cruz supporters, the best thing that could happen now or maybe after NH, is for Ben Carson to drop out and endorse Ted. Nearly all his supporters would go straight to Cruz and that's about 10%. I have NO IDEA if Carson would actually do that but his supporters are more constitutionalists and would likely split between Cruz and Paul imo.
The Donald's speech lasted all of a minute but good job towards humality.
Not a humble concession blah blah. Mostly about himself blah blah.Rubio at least put this race for the White House in context of how impotant it is to get off this ruinous road the Demotards want to travel. Waiting for Cruz to give a barn burner Victory speech!!!
I'm not overly surprised that Cruz was able to fool the evangelicals in Iowa. After all,...he's been praying on Des Moines street corners for 14 hours a day for 6 months.
But what the hell is wrong with those people who voted for Rubio?
I can't believe that 22% of Republican voters in Iowa want amnesty for illegals.
I'm not overly surprised that Cruz was able to fool the evangelicals in Iowa. After all,...he's been praying on Des Moines street corners for 14 hours a day for 6 months.
But what the hell is wrong with those people who voted for Rubio?
I can't believe that 22% of Republican voters in Iowa want amnesty for illegals.
Don't those people read any damn thing?
Rubio's a forked tongue guy and cleverly stole a bunch of votes at the last minute with crap ads. And as far as the evangelicals go, Trump increased his in church time by 20,000% in the last month in Iowa so I wouldn't be pointing fingers over pandering.
I'm not overly surprised that Cruz was able to fool the evangelicals in Iowa. After all,...he's been praying on Des Moines street corners for 14 hours a day for 6 months.
But what the hell is wrong with those people who voted for Rubio?
I can't believe that 22% of Republican voters in Iowa want amnesty for illegals.
Don't those people read any damn thing?
You ever consider that is not a concern to them folks Iowa?
I'm not overly surprised that Cruz was able to fool the evangelicals in Iowa. After all,...he's been praying on Des Moines street corners for 14 hours a day for 6 months.
But what the hell is wrong with those people who voted for Rubio?
I can't believe that 22% of Republican voters in Iowa want amnesty for illegals.
Don't those people read any damn thing?
You have no idea how disgusting Trump is to a majority of people.
Rubio is the beneficiary of that disgust in people who don't like Cruz but want to vote for a winner. So..... they'll try and make him a winner.
But what the hell is wrong with those people who voted for Rubio?
I can't believe that 22% of Republican voters in Iowa want amnesty for illegals.
Don't those people read any damn thing?
Rubio makes people laugh with his quick quips on Hillary and looks like he's 23. That's enough for a lot of the people. Plus half the people in Iowa probably don't even know what an illegal is.
Either that, or 22% of Iowa Republicans wants the country to be flooded with illegals who will be given citizenship and then vote to make this country ruled by Democrats until it folds under,....which won't be too damn long.
You just described the majority of American voters.
Many of the superficial, low information voters think a President has the power to control Taxes, the VA, Jobs, Border Control, build a Wall but he does not have that power. He only has the power to say Yes or No if the vote in Congress is close.
My bet is this is the zenith of Cruz's candidacy. The real contest from here on out will be between Trump and Rubio. I don't think it gets settled until super Tuesday in March. The rest should go home now but half won't.
Iowa is a very liberal state, so I'm not surprised that Rubio was 23% here. I think he also got a boost from Cruz's stupid mailing this last weekend. Cruz still winning despite that mailing actually surprises me.
But... it's Iowa. It really means nothing except to start weeding out the lowest folks that we've known weren't going anywhere.
Guys, I know that all of us have our favorites, and we like to get on here and knock down all but our chosen candidate (I'm Cruz all the way) but we need to remember that whoever the nominee is, we have to unite behind that candidate and vote, or Hillary will win. That happens, we might as well kiss America, as it once was, goodbye! It's always gonna be picking the lessor of two evils!
I'll get excited when a candidate says we need to hang the despicable bastards in & out of office that will have our grandchildren paying taxes on interest on debt accrued in the last 50 years while they all became multi millionaires while "serving their country "
Until we get one of those type candidates I'll just hold my nose & vote for whomever will pick the least anti constitutional justices
Guys, I know that all of us have our favorites, and we like to get on here and knock down all but our chosen candidate (I'm Cruz all the way) but we need to remember that whoever the nominee is, we have to unite behind that candidate and vote, or Hillary will win.
Not for me: it's Trump or I join the ranks of the millions of White voters who did not vote for Mitt Romney in 2012. SCREW the establishment, I Will Not give the DeeCee crowd my vote under any circumstances.
Now we will see where all those small percentages migrate to and who has the support of the big talking non-voting segment Get down to three or four candidates and an idea of the real percentages
And the typical arguments that not voting somehow will register a protest against the status quo. Looks like Hillary or Sanders is the next president by default. It would bother me more to hear that "I won't vote unless ..." but most of them won't vote anyway.
Now we will see where all those small percentages migrate to and who has the support of the big talking non-voting segment Get down to three or four candidates and an idea of the real percentages
That officially makes you irrelevant. Congratulations.
Last night's big loser was the media. THAT was not supposed to happen. We should all be happy about that.
Guys, I know that all of us have our favorites, and we like to get on here and knock down all but our chosen candidate (I'm Cruz all the way) but we need to remember that whoever the nominee is, we have to unite behind that candidate and vote, or Hillary will win.
Not for me: it's Trump or I join the ranks of the millions of White voters who did not vote for Mitt Romney in 2012. SCREW the establishment, I Will Not give the DeeCee crowd my vote under any circumstances.
You think Cruz is DC establishment? They despise him!
Guys, I know that all of us have our favorites, and we like to get on here and knock down all but our chosen candidate (I'm Cruz all the way) but we need to remember that whoever the nominee is, we have to unite behind that candidate and vote, or Hillary will win.
Not for me: it's Trump or I join the ranks of the millions of White voters who did not vote for Mitt Romney in 2012. SCREW the establishment, I Will Not give the DeeCee crowd my vote under any circumstances.
Yep, nothing like cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Lol...Romney claimed victory in Iowa for a week, stealing Santorums momentum after a Santorum won by a very small margin. Cruz won Iowa by almost as much as Obama beat McCain, and in a what, ten man race?
Lol...Romney claimed victory in Iowa for a week, stealing Santorums momentum after a Santorum won by a very small margin. Cruz won Iowa by almost as much as Obama beat McCain, and in a what, ten man race?
It's time for reality.
People keep saying Cruz can't win...
And he keeps winning elections.
This one comes immediately following one of the biggest smear campaigns in history.
Lol...Romney claimed victory in Iowa for a week, stealing Santorums momentum after a Santorum won by a very small margin. Cruz won Iowa by almost as much as Obama beat McCain, and in a what, ten man race?
It's time for reality.
What happened to the supposed greatest political move of all time...Trump and Cruz collaborating behind the scenes?
It's a three man race. Rubio's voters will go to Cruz, or Cruz's voters will go to Rubio. Trump will retain his 35%. A vote for Rubio is a vote for Rubio. A vote for Cruz is a vote for Cruz. A vote for Trump is a vote for Rubio.
Lol...Romney claimed victory in Iowa for a week, stealing Santorums momentum after a Santorum won by a very small margin. Cruz won Iowa by almost as much as Obama beat McCain, and in a what, ten man race?
It's time for reality.
What happened to the supposed greatest political move of all time...Trump and Cruz collaborating behind the scenes?
They may be. All Trump would have had to do to win Iowa was close his mouth. His childish comments cost him and I don't think he's stupid.
It's a three man race. Rubio's voters will go to Cruz, or Cruz's voters will go to Rubio. Trump will retain his 35%. A vote for Rubio is a vote for Rubio. A vote for Cruz is a vote for Cruz. A vote for Trump is a vote for Rubio.
I would think it more like this: -a vote for Rubio is a vote for Rubio -Cruz and Trump attract the same type of voter in the end, so whichever of those two drops first the other picks up the votes
It's a three man race. Rubio's voters will go to Cruz, or Cruz's voters will go to Rubio. Trump will retain his 35%. A vote for Rubio is a vote for Rubio. A vote for Cruz is a vote for Cruz. A vote for Trump is a vote for Rubio.
I would think it more like this: -a vote for Rubio is a vote for Rubio -Cruz and Trump attract the same type of voter in the end, so whichever of those two drops first the other picks up the votes
The only difference is that 60% of Republicans don't hate Cruz like they do Trump. I know Trump supporters don't like to hear that, but eventually they have to come to their senses.
They may be. All Trump would have had to do to win Iowa was close his mouth. His childish comments cost him and I don't think he's stupid.
Certainly he's not stupid. He's narcissistic.
To me, Trump is the classic pathological liar. He will say anything to get what he wants, but many liars I have known are not content to just lie. They have to lie bigger and bigger and push the lies down people's throats. They want to be able to lie and have people know they're lying, but still agree with them because they either fear them so much or want to toady up to them so badly. They also get off on seeing people actually believe an obvious lie.
Lol...Romney claimed victory in Iowa for a week, stealing Santorums momentum after a Santorum won by a very small margin. Cruz won Iowa by almost as much as Obama beat McCain, and in a what, ten man race?
It's time for reality.
...and both Santorum and Huckabee were dead broke after Iowa.
I'm thinking, it's a Trump/Rubio race after Iowa, but NH will give us at least an inkling if Cruz can muster more support.
I also have to say this however: IF you are one of those who've posted "if X doesn't win the R nomination I'm staying home, not only are you an IDIOT, but you are an accessory after the fact in the crime of what is the destruction of this country.
It's great the Rafael won,still it's a long ways to go before this is over.
Absolutely. Iowa is in the rear view mirror. If I were a betting man, I'd bet on Rubio. It depends on Trump and Cruz. If Trump stays in long enough, Rubio is a sure thing. If Cruz outlasts him, it will be a Rubio/Cruz battle.
Nah...there are lots of sane Trump supporters. They'll come around, just hopefully not too late. There are always kooks that want to have plausible deniability, and they are the one's that don't vote.
Rubio is the man to beat. Trump can't do it. Cruz can. A vote for Trump is a vote for Rubio.
I've been trying to point that out for awhile.
Those who think the D C crowd will give up power easily are engaging in wishful thinking. They have never seen Trump as a real threat because of his high negative rating.
Unless Cruz can actually gather enough delegates to win the nomination outright, Rubio will be installed as the Nominee at the Convention.
Just look how many delegate votes the RNC has in its pocket going into the Convention and you'll see what a Hill Cruz has to climb.
The election is decided in a handful of states. Pay attention to the voters in those states.
Very true, but those States haven't had anybody to vote for in a long time. I'm not sure we can predict their future based on the last couple of elections.
The election is decided in a handful of states. Pay attention to the voters in those states.
Very true, but those States haven't had anybody to vote for in a long time. I'm not sure we can predict their future based on the last couple of elections.
No disagreement there.
Neither Hitlery nor Sanders "fires up" the union or black vote bases in places like OH, PA, or MI. That alone is about the best we can hope for going into the general election. They don't even have to "cross over"; they just need to stay home.
I think Trump got outplayed on the ground. He didn't have the machine in place ready to roll the way that Cruz and Rubio did. That was a lack of experience on his part.
I also think someone should point out the faulty poll numbers that the media and polling agencies put out. If you can't get numbers to reflect within 8-10% of reality, then quit putting out numbers.
Remember, there's still 49 more primaries. It's still early. I'm a Cruz guy, but I never believe it until I see it. Not to be a pessimist, but my guy always seems to lose.
It's great the Rafael won,still it's a long ways to go before this is over.
I don't know what it is with me and Rafael. I agree with everything he says but I just cannot LIKE him. He pegs my slime ball meter. Just has a Richard Nixon kind of vibe about him, and is about as inspiring as a concrete block.
That is totally illogical and unreasonable on my part but I just don't get that feel from any of the rest of them.
I also think someone should point out the faulty poll numbers that the media and polling agencies put out.
Those numbers aren't faulty, they're false. Polls are designed to shape an election by showing the sheep which way to go. It looks like smart people are catching on to the trick and voting their own conscience.
Nope. Never was. There are not all that many farmers votes in Iowa anymore. Mostly corporate. The only person it mattered to was Brandstad since his kid works for the ethanol cabal.
I also think someone should point out the faulty poll numbers that the media and polling agencies put out.
Those numbers aren't faulty, they're false. Polls are designed to shape an election by showing the sheep which way to go. It looks like smart people are catching on to the trick and voting their own conscience.
I also think someone should point out the faulty poll numbers that the media and polling agencies put out.
Those numbers aren't faulty, they're false. Polls are designed to shape an election by showing the sheep which way to go. It looks like smart people are catching on to the trick and voting their own conscience.
The only difference is that 60% of Republicans don't hate Cruz like they do Trump. I know Trump supporters don't like to hear that, but eventually they have to come to their senses.
Nope. Never was. There are not all that many farmers votes in Iowa anymore. Mostly corporate. The only person it mattered to was Brandstad since his kid works for the ethanol cabal.
Good job by ted on turning an ignoramus on the ethanol issue;
I also have to say this however: IF you are one of those who've posted "if X doesn't win the R nomination I'm staying home, not only are you an IDIOT, but you are an accessory after the fact in the crime of what is the destruction of this country.
Amen......only a complete moron could think otherwise.
Nope. Never was. There are not all that many farmers votes in Iowa anymore. Mostly corporate. The only person it mattered to was Brandstad since his kid works for the ethanol cabal.
The difference between conservatives and liberals is that when a liberal drops out, all their support will go to the next in line. Conservatives whine and cry and stay home unless Mr. Perfect gets the nomination.
It is up to Congress for border control. Not a President. The President just says Yes or No, if the votes are close in Congress.
It is up to Congress to build a wall. Not up to a President to build a wall.
Make sure Trump gets this message. He does not need to be president to make this country safe. great again.
Truly think trump would be more capable (in his element) of lobbying congress to do great things. If he has a viable plan to make this country great again by building a more effective wall for example. All the while using Mexico's money to build the wall. If he has a viable plan just sell it to congress under the wire not seeking any credit and let Cruse or Rubio sign off on this as well when they are President. If he really wants to make this country great again he does not need to wait until he is President to provide some real action to this end.