Then you are part of the problem and a friend to Hillary

I hope you both know how to smile while you eat your schit sandwich

Man's followin his conscience.

I absolutey, positively, without even a hint of a doubt will never cast a vote for Rubio,...at all, even.

You is a brilliant, logical, conversationalist.

Seems you'd be more used to havin your ass handed to ya.

I absolutey, positively, without even a hint of a doubt will never cast a vote for Rubio,...at all, even.

I absolutey, positively, without even a hint of a doubt will never cast a vote for Rubio,...at all, even.

republicans make it hard to be a republican

You can say that again.

I absolutey, positively, without even a hint of a doubt will never cast a vote for Rubio,...at all, even.

Well,...it's not so much to do with conscience. I just won't actively be a part of the destruction of America.

Rubio would be to America what Angela Merkle is to Germany.

Staying home and pouting doesn't defeat the Ds; and it damned near guarantees the Ds the next three SCOTUS selections.

If I felt the need to support Rubio, I'd just move to Tijuana and be done with it.

Staying home and pouting doesn't defeat the Ds; and it damned near guarantees the Ds the next three SCOTUS selections.

Then you are part of the problem and a friend to Hillary

republicans make it hard to be a republican

*shakin' head*

Every 4 years we have to go through this chit.

Them: Well!!,...are you ready to be the RNC's bitch yet?!!

Me: No

THEN YOU'RE PART OF THE PROBLEM!!!!

It's a little known fact,...but Rubio is Bernie Sander's love child.

I need to be gettin' a paycheck fer this chit.

Santorum just went Rubio.

the fix is in boys.

Maybe Rubio offered a VP slot.

Man's followin his conscience.

You sayin' he ain't got the right to do that, comrade?

Harry Chapin wrote a song about it.

~~~A child arrived just the other day
Dad a Jewish commie, Mom a follower of Che~~~

You're obviously not enlightened.....

I'm pretty sure it's a wash when it comes to certain types.

No doubt about it---Rubio screwed the pooch on amnesty, BUT............

Whether Hillary or Bernie gets the nod for damn-nocrats their position on amnesty is every bit as bad as Rubio's and their position on damn near EVERYTHING else is FAR WORSE!

If it comes down to it I'll have to cast my vote for Rubio, but I pray for Cruz to carry the day! He ain't perfect but he's light years ahead of the rest.

Republicans--"You gotta eat our schidt sandwich rather than the Democrats' schidt sandwich 'cause it tastes slightly better, or else you're part of the problem!"

If that means I'm not a drunk Kentuckian who has never put his ass in the line for anything other than the next bottle, then you're right.

lolol,...you're funny when you decide to take on that "holier than thou" routine you do.

You're a taxfeeder in D.C.

Somedays you choose one persona,..somedays you choose another,...on here.

But when the lights go off, you're a taxfeedin' lawyer in D.C.

Try to get over it before your time on earth is through.

Otherwise,..the realizations that arrive with old age are gonna be hard on ya.

Any man who thinks America died with the Whiskey Rebellion is only a spectator anyway. What do you care what happens?

The Rubios in the GOP are the problem.

If somebody is going to turn America into a 3rd world socialist chithole, they shouldn't be a Republican.

That's what Democrats are for.

I absolutey, positively, without even a hint of a doubt will never cast a vote for Rubio,...at all, even.

I absolutey, positively, without even a hint of a doubt will never cast a vote for Rubio,...at all, even.

Gotta admit I got a chuckle out of that.

If I felt the need to support Rubio, I'd just move to Tijuana and be done with it.

A bad republican can be replaced with a better republican...

Question: Will you vote for Charles Manson if he's the GOP nominee?

Answer: I reckon not.

Then you're part of the problem!!!

while funny, that does bring up a good concept

is there a point where you won't vote for an "R" candidate over a democrat?

how about a guy that embezzled $3m dollars in a ponzi scheme before he went into office but he's strong on 2A?

how about someone convicted of manslaughter? raped a girl while he was in college?

the point is - everyone most likely has a cutoff to where they could not vote for a candidate as the Republican nominee

I absolutey, positively, without even a hint of a doubt will never cast a vote for Rubio,...at all, even.

I can see why you wouldn't want to get into those situations.

it would mean admitting there are limits on who you would support as the Republican candidate.

Why is it that "conservatives" are able to find one issue with a candidate they don't like and then conclude that candidate is unsuitable?

No, what it means is that a "candidate" who is exposed to have done those things will not win the Repub nomination, so none of us will be faced with those what-ifs ahead of time.

If/when Rubio or Trump or Cruz is proven to have done one of those crimes, he will be thrown under the bus by the Repub process. This is pretty much the exact opposite of the Democrat process, in which illegality and avoidance of prosecution is seen as a politically savvy move.

Or forgive the fact that Trump was a Democrat until he decided to run for President, but not forgive Rubio's amnesty stand. Not a Rubio fan by a long shot but my eyes are not blindfolded either. miles

A 1 term senator hasn't had time to establish anything other than a persona.

And, due to the complicated parliamentary rues in the Senate, if he serves more than half a term he will have been forced into votes that can be used to discredit him in any quest for higher office.

Show me a multi term Senator going directly into the W H since JFK.

Then, go back prior to him.

I absolutey, positively, without even a hint of a doubt will never cast a vote for Rubio,...at all, even.

It's primary season, so now's your chance to influence who the nominee will be. But if you can't get your guy nominated, take one for the team and vote for the nominee, even if it is Rubio. Anything else is a betrayal far greater than anything Rubio has done.

Republican presidential hopeful Marco Rubio on Thursday vaulted into second place in a daily tracking poll, but he still trails front-runner Donald Trump by double digits in the New Hampshire primary

I absolutey, positively, without even a hint of a doubt will never cast a vote for Rubio,...at all, even.

Jehovah witness much? I despise queerbio but not even remotely as much as I loathe hilda and bunny. So if its queerbio then so be it, he gets my vote.

So no vote for Rubio at all, meaning you're ok with the whole SCOTUS issue? got it. Apparently, stupid's bone deep...

It looks like that's what he's saying jorge. We just have to pray there aren't too many voters that dim.

Trump sure isn't my first choice. He's said so many things that are offensive to me during his life. But of course I would vote for him over Hilary instead of sitting on my hands and pouting.

Oh, but there are. The last election proved that. BTW, just found out that Cruz is a Baptist. A Cuban Baptist? sounds fishy.. Might have to rethink...

That's because you're not a Cuban.

___

The first Cuban Baptists were patriots who were exiled to the United States during the Ten Years' War (1868–1878). Some became Baptists while in the U. S., and later returned to Cuba. Exile Albert Díaz joined a church in New York City. He returned to Cuba in 1882, and organized an independent congregation at Havana in 1883. In 1885, he was ordained as a Baptist minister, and, in 1886, he led his church to become Baptist. Southern Baptists sent C. R. Daniel to oversee the work in 1901, and he was instrumental in organizing the Baptist Convention of Western Cuba in 1905.

Other Baptist organizations in Cuba are the Baptist Convention of Eastern Cuba or Convención Bautista de Cuba Oriental (org. 1905), the Free Will Baptist Convention of Cuba or Convención Bautista Libre de Cuba (org. 1943), and the Fraternity of Baptist Churches of Cuba or Fraternidad de Iglesias Bautistas de Cuba (org. 1989).

The Fraternity of Baptist Churches was started in 1989 by three churches expelled from the BCWC because of views related to politics, open communion and open baptism. A recent reconciliation between the Fraternity of Baptist Churches in Cuba and the Baptist Convention of Western Cuba led to the "Fraternity" becoming a member of the Baptist World Alliance, of which the Western Convention was already a member. Baptists in Cuba form one of the largest non-Catholic denominations on the island. Churches in Cuba are free to hold meetings in their church buildings or in homes, but not in public places.

........

I guess we would have been better off by now if Algore had won in 2000, or John-boy Kerry in '04? Come on, people.

And if my aunt had nuts she'd be my uncle
All moot and conjecture

If we had Kerry, would we have had Romney instead of Obama? I would have taken that trade. Would you?

You don't know that we wouldn't have had 8 years of Gore, then 8 years of Hillary. Just vote for the most conservative option you have and don't out-think yourself. Do you think the Dem's let Bush win so that it would set the stage for Obama? No, they fought it all the way to the Supreme Court. As Al Davis said, "Just win, baby!"

I see it different.



Voting for a bad candidate can sometimes do more harm than good. Perhaps some will argue that but I have little doubt that if Bush hadn't been such a lousy president, we never would have seen Obama in office.


And yes I voted for Bush 2 so I'm just as complicit as anyone else.

In any moment of decision, the best thing you can do is the right thing, the next best thing is the wrong thing, and the worst thing you can do is nothing.

A couple of points:
I don't think he was such a bad president. He was handed a schit sandwich with 9/11, and along with the likes of RP, did try and stop the mortgage train wreck which most agree, was the catalyst for the crash.

The media set out to vilify him from day one, and it's a pretty sure bet that as "bad" as you say GWB , Gore would have been better? The rest is pure conjecture. What remains a FACT, is a no or "protest" vote for a kook-candidate, helps the other side..

He was for total amnesty? ......

Bush Amnesty Plan Raises Immigration Concerns
Published January 08, 2004 FoxNews.com
Facebook21 Twitter0 Email Print

The massive new immigration initiative unveiled by the White House has Democrats and ethnic identity organizations accusing Republicans of election-year pandering, and has the Republican base wondering whether George W. Bush and the Republican Party has sold them out.

The initiative, which draws heavily on legislation already introduced in Congress by three Arizona Republicans, Sen. John McCain and Rep. Jeff Flake and Rep. Jim Kolbe, has two central components. It would provide a mechanism by which some U.S. businesses would be able to import an unlimited number of low-wage foreign workers, and it would allow most of the roughly 10 million illegal aliens already in the United States a means by which they (and their extended families) would be able to remain legally -- and permanently -- in the United States.

Advocates of strong enforcement of U.S. immigration laws charge that the new Bush plan is really a massive new amnesty for illegal aliens, in spite of repeated Bush administration assurances to the contrary. The administration, and the Republican sponsors of the parallel McCain-Kolbe-Flake plan (search) on Capitol Hill, claim that their plans are not really amnesties because they require illegal aliens to pay a small fee and wait a short time before they can receive their legal permanent status.

However, critics argue that any plan that allows, as the new Bush plan does, illegal aliens to remain legally and permanently in the United States without having to return to their home countries and apply to enter the United States legally like everyone else, is, in fact, an amnesty.

The Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007 — its full name was Secure Borders, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1348) — was a bill discussed in the 110th United States Congress that would have provided legal status and a path to citizenship for the approximately 12 million illegal immigrants residing in the United States.

The bill was a compromise based largely on three previous failed immigration reform bills:

The Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act (S. 1033), a bill proposed in May 2005 by Senators Ted Kennedy and John McCain, sometimes referred to as the "McCain-Kennedy or McKennedy Bill."
The Comprehensive Enforcement and Immigration Reform Act of 2005 (S. 1438), a bill proposed in July 2005 by Senators John Cornyn and Jon Kyl, sometimes referred to as the "Cornyn-Kyl Bill."
The Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 (S. 2611), sponsored by Senator Arlen Specter, which was passed in the Senate in May 2006 but never passed in the House.

The bill's sole sponsor in the Senate was Majority Leader Harry Reid, though it was crafted in large part as a result of efforts by Senators Kennedy, McCain and Kyl, along with Senator Lindsey Graham, and input from President George W. Bush, who strongly supported the bill.

Immigration is just not that important to most people.

Maybe where you live, Lt. Not in my hood. It's P1 for a lot of these Spaneesh here. Many of them couldn't care less about the big picture. Hell, they don't even want to know what the big picture is.