Home
The following is an exact excerpt from a just now released Washington Post article:

Attorney General Loretta Lynch indicated Wednesday that the law doesn't require the Justice Department to pursue criminal charges against Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email system, even if the FBI recommends criminal charges.

Lynch was asked in a hearing by Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, what her department would do if the FBI were to recommend that step. "If the FBI were to make a referral to the Department of Justice to pursue a case by way of indictment and to convene a grand jury for that purpose, the Department of Justice is not required by law to do so, are they — are you?" Cornyn asked.

Lynch didn't answer directly, but seemed to indicate the department has some wiggle room, and can consult with officials before deciding what to do.

"It would not be an operation of law, it would be an operation of procedures," Lynch said in reply. She added that the decision to pursue a criminal case would be "done in conjunction with the agents" involved in the investigation. "It's not something that we would want to cut them out of the process."

End of excerpt.

Comment by me: The scum sucking liberals from kalifornicopia, new york, chicago and a few other palces have given the United States of America the worst President and the worst two Attorney's General this country has ever had.
Now, the scum sucking slimeballs, hussein obama and lorretta lynch are setting the ground work for exonerating "the hildabeast" prior to this years Presidential Election.
hussein obama, earache holder and lorretta lynch should all have been impeached and in prison by now.
They have turned this formally great country into a third world joke!
Sad.
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy
At least Obama apologized a few years ago for a few soldiers burning korans.
I always thought that if somebody broke the law and got caught, they would be arrested and go to jail. Guess not. On the other hand, they CAN decide she broke the law, but refuse to prosecute. If that happens, the GOP better raise holy hell.
Hello!! Illegals are supposed to be deported , not sent to college. Hasbeen

Politicians are above the law and reproach. Thought everyone knew that already. crazy
I do not know why anyone thinks that Obama will allow the indictment of Hillary R. Clinton.

If Obama were to do so, it would be a manifest indictment of his own incompetence, insidiousness, and overall failure to adhere to his sworn oath (which is sadly laughable), and his utter disregard for the protection of the United States of America.

Obama appointed Hillary. He knew she had unsecured email servers through which she was passing highly classified State secrets to our enemies. He did nothing. He will not now endanger his "legacy" to prosecute his traitorous appointee.

If FBI Director Comey pushes it, Obama will fire him quicker than a cat can lick his asz.

Might as well forget it, boys and girls.

L.W.



Well of course- Laws are only for the honest John Q Citizen. Not for our bottom feeding politicians. They always get away with it.
The orders to our local US Attorney was to focus on kiddie porn and white color crime. The FBI is about to dump a butt load of evidence of illegal "white color" criminal activity on Hillary Clinton and you can bet not one darn thing will be done because they do not have to do anything.

We can whine and moan all day but they do not have to do diddly. And, you can bet they will not. They are going to round file this case as soon as they can. We can only hope Obama does not pardon her and the next president files the case IFF a republican wins.

So far the only candidate I have heard who will file the case is Trump. I'm still waiting to hear Cruz or Kasich say those words.
kwg
Originally Posted by benchman
I always thought that if somebody broke the law and got caught, they would be arrested and go to jail. Guess not. On the other hand, they CAN decide she broke the law, but refuse to prosecute. If that happens, the GOP better raise holy hell.


yea, that's gonna happen!

ked
Originally Posted by VarmintGuy
The following is an exact excerpt from a just now released Washington Post article:

Attorney General Loretta Lynch indicated Wednesday that the law doesn't require the Justice Department to pursue criminal charges against Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email system, even if the FBI recommends criminal charges.

Lynch was asked in a hearing by Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, what her department would do if the FBI were to recommend that step. "If the FBI were to make a referral to the Department of Justice to pursue a case by way of indictment and to convene a grand jury for that purpose, the Department of Justice is not required by law to do so, are they — are you?" Cornyn asked.

Lynch didn't answer directly, but seemed to indicate the department has some wiggle room, and can consult with officials before deciding what to do.

"It would not be an operation of law, it would be an operation of procedures," Lynch said in reply. She added that the decision to pursue a criminal case would be "done in conjunction with the agents" involved in the investigation. "It's not something that we would want to cut them out of the process."

End of excerpt.

Comment by me: The scum sucking liberals from kalifornicopia, new york, chicago and a few other palces have given the United States of America the worst President and the worst two Attorney's General this country has ever had.
Now, the scum sucking slimeballs, hussein obama and lorretta lynch are setting the ground work for exonerating "the hildabeast" prior to this years Presidential Election.
hussein obama, earache holder and lorretta lynch should all have been impeached and in prison by now.
They have turned this formally great country into a third world joke!
Sad.
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy


My comment:

The voters of CA, NY, and Chicago did not give the US the scum bags mentioned, the liberal voters of all 50 states did, including those in Montana.

The voters did not put the race baiting Holder or Lynch in office, the Negro in Chief did.

Hopefully a lot of the accumulated scum will be eliminated this coming Fall.
The conservative jackasses in Washington confirmed her.

Remember what the establishment has done for you when you vote.
The confirming conservative jackasses are scum suckers as well.
If (when) they let her get away with security violations, the intel community may cause one heil of a backlash. Will be interesting if some spooks go off the reservation.
Originally Posted by 86thecat
If (when) they let her get away with security violations, the intel community may cause one heil of a backlash. Will be interesting if some spooks go off the reservation.
They have everything on everybody. Bloodbath
Originally Posted by benchman
Originally Posted by 86thecat
If (when) they let her get away with security violations, the intel community may cause one heil of a backlash. Will be interesting if some spooks go off the reservation.
They have everything on everybody. Bloodbath


the govt intel community is also full of scumsuckers. they go off the rez, they lose their scum sucking job, benefits, and pension. no matter what intel might have, scum suckers don't, and won't, indict scum suckers.
Unfortunately, politicians and political appointees are outside of UCMJ jurisdiction. They have always been one of the greatest threats to classified and sensitive information control. Nothing new here.
What I hope is going to happen is that the FBI will NOT recommend bringing charges until AFTER the elections and the AIC can't pardon that biotch.. A new Prez (damn well better not be a dem) will be telling Lynch to go find honest work and will appoint a different AG - which, at that time all the evidence comes out, indictments are handed down and TFP will switch to an orange jumpsuit, hopefully with leg irons..
What difference does it make, the Country is FUBAR anyway.
Interesting. Saw on Huffpost news last night when Hillary was asked if she would continue to run for President if indicted she said, "That's not going to happen." Beoch sure is arrogantly confident.

Let's see. John Gotti was the "Teflon Don". She must be the Teflon Traitor. Come to think of it, Gotti did finally get nailed. One can only hope.
Paul B.
Witnessed a 4-star General order an investigation into who released classified operational info to the newspapers. Answer came back a week or so later that it was a political appointee. The General's response was basically "well, that the end of that issue"
Civilians don't get criminally prosecuted for being sloppy with classified materials. At worst their clearance gets pulled or they get fired. If they're real high up, they get a refresher on proper procedures and asked not to do it again! She would have to have sold it or given it to a foreign power or group to get prosecuted. Much as I'd like to see her go down for this - it ain't gonna happen.
She did give it away by using her private email & server.
Anyone ever get out of a speeding ticket? Know a cop who "let them go" on something.

Officers discretion. Prosecutorial discretion.

Both bullcrap imo. Law, law, same for all. period.

.(doublepost)
Originally Posted by VarmintGuy

They have turned this formally great country into a third world joke!
Sad.
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy


What is sad...is the fact these ingrates feel the freedom to act with impunity because the American people are not standing up against them.

Those on this board, or any one you may know that voted for these criminals are as bad, if not worse.
© 24hourcampfire