Good. The blacks won't turn out to vote for an all white ticket, not in big numbers, and Kaine is very disliked in VA these days.
Desperation pick on her part and damaging to both.
Doesn't sound like desperation to me. Someone who is leading in the national polls and whose campaign apparatus has been engaged for years probably has something on the ball. I suspect that 90% of the blacks will vote for Hillary and this means she will probably pick up a swing state, Virginia.
Good. The blacks won't turn out to vote for an all white ticket, not in big numbers, and Kaine is very disliked in VA these days.
Desperation pick on her part and damaging to both.
Doesn't sound like desperation to me. Someone who is leading in the national polls and whose campaign apparatus has been engaged for years probably has something on the ball. I suspect that 90% of the blacks will vote for Hillary and this means she will probably pick up a swing state, Virginia.
I still find it unbelievable that masses that have to be morons would even consider voting for the traitorous murdering bitch.
I suspect that 90% of the blacks will vote for Hillary and this means she will probably pick up a swing state, Virginia.
------------------
Just the opposite, actually. With the selection of Kaine, rather than a Booker type selection, how many blacks do you believe will vote this election in comparison to 2012?
I suspect that 90% of the blacks will vote for Hillary and this means she will probably pick up a swing state, Virginia.
------------------
Just the opposite, actually. With the selection of Kaine, rather than a Booker type selection, how many blacks do you believe will vote this election in comparison to 2012?
I think you're right Bob, I was talking to my cleaning guy last night about this. He's a conservative hard working country black guy. We all know where the inner-city blacks stand on this, but the church going, hard working blacks from the country are different. He said they all know how corrupt and socialistic Hillary is, and they need a change just like the rest of us. They're sick of high taxes and want more money in their pockets. They know that something needs to be done about illegal immigration and terrorism also. He said that a lot of them won't really come out and admit it to the other brothers, but he can tell that they're swinging towards Trump. He said last time, they were voting for Obama because of hope and change and thought he would help them. He didn't and they're pizzed and don't want another 4 years of this schit. He said that even though they won't admit it, when they get into the voting booth, a larger percentage will vote for Trump that won't really be reflected in the polls.
Trump needs to pick up the Sanders vote. It shouldn't be that hard to position himself as the alternative candidate.
Trump will not be picking up Sanders votes. Dhimmicrats, for all their real and imagined faults, always manage to band together and vote the ticket in the Presidential election. That one trait is why they win, and Conservatives lose. GOP is more worried about party purity, than in winning.
My read on it Sam suggests that Trump will not only get some Sanders' dissident votes but, just as good;a large percentage of Sanders voters simply won't cast a vote, at all.
This will be a turnout election, imo coupled with how the Independents and various unions roll.
I suspect that 90% of the blacks will vote for Hillary and this means she will probably pick up a swing state, Virginia.
------------------
Just the opposite, actually. With the selection of Kaine, rather than a Booker type selection, how many blacks do you believe will vote this election in comparison to 2012?
I think you're right Bob, I was talking to my cleaning guy last night about this. He's a conservative hard working country black guy. We all know where the inner-city blacks stand on this, but the church going, hard working blacks from the country are different. He said they all know how corrupt and socialistic Hillary is, and they need a change just like the rest of us. They're sick of high taxes and want more money in their pockets. They know that something needs to be done about illegal immigration and terrorism also. He said that a lot of them won't really come out and admit it to the other brothers, but he can tell that they're swinging towards Trump. He said last time, they were voting for Obama because of hope and change and thought he would help them. He didn't and they're pizzed and don't want another 4 years of this schit. He said that even though they won't admit it, when they get into the voting booth, a larger percentage will vote for Trump that won't really be reflected in the polls.
I wonder about this as well, and not just with the black population. I think a great many hispanics and women won't admit publicly that they will support Trump, but may just pull the lever for him when in the booth.
I suspect that 90% of the blacks will vote for Hillary and this means she will probably pick up a swing state, Virginia.
------------------
Just the opposite, actually. With the selection of Kaine, rather than a Booker type selection, how many blacks do you believe will vote this election in comparison to 2012?
I think you're right Bob, I was talking to my cleaning guy last night about this. He's a conservative hard working country black guy. We all know where the inner-city blacks stand on this, but the church going, hard working blacks from the country are different. He said they all know how corrupt and socialistic Hillary is, and they need a change just like the rest of us. They're sick of high taxes and want more money in their pockets. They know that something needs to be done about illegal immigration and terrorism also. He said that a lot of them won't really come out and admit it to the other brothers, but he can tell that they're swinging towards Trump. He said last time, they were voting for Obama because of hope and change and thought he would help them. He didn't and they're pizzed and don't want another 4 years of this schit. He said that even though they won't admit it, when they get into the voting booth, a larger percentage will vote for Trump that won't really be reflected in the polls.
all I'm saying, is that dhimmicrats tend to vote the chosen candidate. Republicans tend to stay away (remember those of us here, that did not vote in the last two elections?). If the GOP candidate does not please every single issue constituent, they stay home, or 'vote their conscience' by pissing away their vote on a third party candidate. Ergo, GOP lost the last two elections, and will lose this one too, unless all the party votes Trump. This is not a Euro style election, where there is power sharing among the losers. It's winner take all. A concept so simple, even Johnson and Ron Paul supporters should be able to understand it. Bernie lovers will pull the hillary lever in the booth. Trust me on this.
The top 3 states with the highest percentages of blacks, went RED in 08 and 12.
In contrast, some of the WHITEST states went BLUE.
Again, it's the stupid, lily white Yankees that are the problem.
And of course LEFT coast.
PA is pretty whiterrible and other than three areas of the state it went red. But those three areas are huge centers of black populations.. quite frankly Noone living inside city limits should be allowed to vote regardless of race
The top 3 states with the highest percentages of blacks, went RED in 08 and 12.
In contrast, some of the WHITEST states went BLUE.
Again, it's the stupid, lily white Yankees that are the problem.
And of course LEFT coast.
PA is pretty whiterrible and other than three areas of the state it went red. But those three areas are huge centers of black populations.. quite frankly Noone living inside city limits should be allowed to vote regardless of race
Mississippi is 37% BLACK and Obama didn't win Mississippi in 2008 nor 2012
Pennsylvania is 10% BLACK and went Obama in 2008 and 2012.
Please, tell me again how WHITE YANKEES aren't the problem?
The top 3 states with the highest percentages of blacks, went RED in 08 and 12.
In contrast, some of the WHITEST states went BLUE.
Again, it's the stupid, lily white Yankees that are the problem.
And of course LEFT coast.
PA is pretty whiterrible and other than three areas of the state it went red. But those three areas are huge centers of black populations.. quite frankly Noone living inside city limits should be allowed to vote regardless of race
Mississippi is 37% BLACK and Obama didn't win Mississippi in 2008 nor 2012
Pennsylvania is 10% BLACK and went Obama in 2008 and 2012.
Please, tell me again how WHITE YANKEES aren't the problem?
MS has 2.9 million people so 1.07 million votes PA has 12.7 million people so 1.2 million votes
Percentages don't tell the whole story - essentially the same for both states tho a huge disparity in percentages.
WTF are you talking about? Percentages DO tell the whole story concerning who is voting for who.
PA has a black population of 10%, Obama gets 54% of the vote in PA. That AIN'T the black vote.
The top 3 states with the highest percentages of blacks, went RED in 08 and 12.
In contrast, some of the WHITEST states went BLUE.
Again, it's the stupid, lily white Yankees that are the problem.
And of course LEFT coast.
PA is pretty whiterrible and other than three areas of the state it went red. But those three areas are huge centers of black populations.. quite frankly Noone living inside city limits should be allowed to vote regardless of race
Mississippi is 37% BLACK and Obama didn't win Mississippi in 2008 nor 2012
Pennsylvania is 10% BLACK and went Obama in 2008 and 2012.
Please, tell me again how WHITE YANKEES aren't the problem?
Again scott, look at the map. Aside from philthadelphia and schittsburgh. And I think the harrisburg/Scranton area...the entire rest of the state went red.
It's not white/black problem it's an urban/rural problem
The top 3 states with the highest percentages of blacks, went RED in 08 and 12.
In contrast, some of the WHITEST states went BLUE.
Again, it's the stupid, lily white Yankees that are the problem.
And of course LEFT coast.
PA is pretty whiterrible and other than three areas of the state it went red. But those three areas are huge centers of black populations.. quite frankly Noone living inside city limits should be allowed to vote regardless of race
Mississippi is 37% BLACK and Obama didn't win Mississippi in 2008 nor 2012
Pennsylvania is 10% BLACK and went Obama in 2008 and 2012.
Please, tell me again how WHITE YANKEES aren't the problem?
Again scott, look at the map. Aside from philthadelphia and schittsburgh. And I think the harrisburg/Scranton area...the entire rest of the state went red.
It's not white/black problem it's an urban/rural problem
How many large cities does Mississippi have?
HOLY CHRIST, how stupid are you people.
I don't give a shiet about the size of the state etc. It's WHITE LIBERAL YANKEES that put Obama in office. I don't give a [bleep] if they live in Mooseballs or Philly.
The top 3 states with the highest percentages of blacks, went RED in 08 and 12.
In contrast, some of the WHITEST states went BLUE.
Again, it's the stupid, lily white Yankees that are the problem.
And of course LEFT coast.
PA is pretty whiterrible and other than three areas of the state it went red. But those three areas are huge centers of black populations.. quite frankly Noone living inside city limits should be allowed to vote regardless of race
Mississippi is 37% BLACK and Obama didn't win Mississippi in 2008 nor 2012
Pennsylvania is 10% BLACK and went Obama in 2008 and 2012.
Please, tell me again how WHITE YANKEES aren't the problem?
MS has 2.9 million people so 1.07 million votes PA has 12.7 million people so 1.2 million votes
Percentages don't tell the whole story - essentially the same for both states tho a huge disparity in percentages.
WTF are you talking about? Percentages DO tell the whole story concerning who is voting for who.
PA has a black population of 10%, Obama gets 54% of the vote in PA. That AIN'T the black vote.
Kerist - I'm basically proving your point for you.
37% of a voting block in 1 state basically equals 10% of a voting block in another.
Which is why you can't simply state that a single state/voting block etc is what gave anyone R or D an election.
I do know that when I look at states that went Obama - it's the thicker urban areas and not the rural ones - we've all seen the elections broken down by county - not state and it always paints a much different picture.
Steelhead, I agree with you about the white liberal yankees to an extent. I think you're correct when it comes to most of the states in New England.
However, in states like PA, MD, and VA, we are more dictated by the blacks that live in the urban areas. We do have our share of white libs that live just outside of the big cities in the suburban areas too. So the white libs, conjoined with the blacks in those areas, are what makes states like this one blue. And believe me, we have a lot of liberal blacks in the cities and suburban areas. If those people stay home because they're not jazzed up over their candidate, Trump can win those states. We saw this in 2014 when we elected our current governor.
I know and deal with a lot of people in both VA and PA also. I know for a fact that those states, as well as MD, are geographically red. But we're out numbered by the libs in and around the big cities and the vast majority of them are black.
So back to my earlier comments, what I was getting at, is that if the inner-city blacks stay home, and the more conservative blacks from the country, swing towards Trump, Trump can win those states like MD, VA, and PA.
Steelhead, I agree with you about the white liberal yankees to an extent. I think you're correct when it comes to most of the states in New England.
However, in states like PA, MD, and VA, we are more dictated by the blacks that live in the urban areas. We do have our share of white libs that live just outside of the big cities in the suburban areas too. So the white libs, conjoined with the blacks in those areas, are what makes states like this one blue. And believe me, we have a lot of liberal blacks in the cities and suburban areas. If those people stay home because they're not jazzed up over their candidate, Trump can win those states. We saw this in 2014 when we elected our current governor.
I know and deal with a lot of people in both VA and PA also. I know for a fact that those states, as well as MD, are geographically red. But we're out numbered by the libs in and around the big cities and the vast majority of them are black.
So back to my earlier comments, what I was getting at, is that if the inner-city blacks stay home, and the more conservative blacks from the country, swing towards Trump, Trump can win those states like MD, VA, and PA.
I'll try it another way, PA is 83% white, how did Obama win PA both times? Here's a hint, it wasn't the 10% black vote.
Steelhead, I agree with you about the white liberal yankees to an extent. I think you're correct when it comes to most of the states in New England.
However, in states like PA, MD, and VA, we are more dictated by the blacks that live in the urban areas. We do have our share of white libs that live just outside of the big cities in the suburban areas too. So the white libs, conjoined with the blacks in those areas, are what makes states like this one blue. And believe me, we have a lot of liberal blacks in the cities and suburban areas. If those people stay home because they're not jazzed up over their candidate, Trump can win those states. We saw this in 2014 when we elected our current governor.
I know and deal with a lot of people in both VA and PA also. I know for a fact that those states, as well as MD, are geographically red. But we're out numbered by the libs in and around the big cities and the vast majority of them are black.
So back to my earlier comments, what I was getting at, is that if the inner-city blacks stay home, and the more conservative blacks from the country, swing towards Trump, Trump can win those states like MD, VA, and PA.
I'll try it another way, PA is 83% white, how did Obama win PA both times? Here's a hint, it wasn't the 10% black vote.
Same way he won NH........
You call 'em liberal Yankees, I call 'em Massholes. Same enemy, different name.
And permeating the airwaves today are videos whereby Kaine is blasting Clinton for her email scandals and another where he states should should face the consequences for her breaches in the handling of classified information.
Hitlery is paranoid and desperate. She would not consider a VP she hadn't known and worked with for at least a decade because of her scandals, and she HAD to try to shore up VA (won't work). In doing so, she lost the mass black turn out she desperately needs in PA, OH, NC, and NJ, and she's jeopardized the Latino vote. Kaine brings her nothing but a false sense of security to her ego and to NotVA.
Master stroke by Trump to pick the "safe" Pence and have Hitlery "appeased" into picking the "safe" Kaine.