Home
Posted By: Redneck The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
....just ruled yesterday that the ban on gun sales to medical marijuana card holders does NOT violate the Second Amendment..

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/08/3...s-to-medical-marijuana-card-holders.html

I understand that question "e" on the ATF 4473 form asks about illegal use of drugs and therefore can ban a sale, but for those with a legitimate medical use card to control pain associated with various cancers seems to me that the ban just isn't right.. A person controlling pain from cancer via marijuana cannot own a gun to protect themselves?

What am I missing? What's the consensus here?
Posted By: Rock Chuck Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
MJ use, medicinal or not, violates federal law and the 2d A. is a federal issue.
Posted By: bryguy Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
its simple.......Marijuana is an illegal drug in the eyes of the federal government......that particular question deals with illegal drug use.....hence the exclusion.
Posted By: Redneck Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
Understood all the above, and I agree.. But again I stress the medical use.. And, since all use is illegal to the feds, why aren't those same feds jumping on all the states that authorize use for medical reasons?
Posted By: milespatton Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
Right now all it is hurting in their eyes, is the gun owner. Good new for the feds. miles
Posted By: Redneck Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
Originally Posted by milespatton
Right now all it is hurting in their eyes, is the gun owner. Good new for the feds. miles
Exactly how I take it..
Posted By: RWE Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
So, the fed chooses to enforce federal marijuana laws when it comes to guns, but not when it comes to state sales?
Posted By: AFTERUM Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
Originally Posted by Redneck
Originally Posted by milespatton
Right now all it is hurting in their eyes, is the gun owner. Good new for the feds. miles
Exactly how I take it..



toe in the door....little by little.....
Posted By: Crow hunter Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
Originally Posted by Redneck
But again I stress the medical use.. And, since all use is illegal to the feds, why aren't those same feds jumping on all the states that authorize use for medical reasons?


There is no legitimate medical use for marijuana in the eyes of federal law so having a note from your doctor saying you need pot means nothing to the Feds, & it's the Feds that have to approve the sale.

The Feds not approving a sale and prosecuting states that allow pot are two different things. Part of the reason is we have a president that's a former heavy drug user & he isn't going to go after states about it. The Feds have a hands off policy towards these "medical marijuana" states.

It's a case where state & federal laws aren't in sync & the Feds are the ones in control of NICS so they win when you try to buy a gun. Really what it shows is why we should have never allowed the Feds to institute a background check system. The 2nd amendment says the RKBA shall not be infringed, it doesn't say you have to ask the Feds for permission first.

Posted By: Huntz Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
So if you buy your weed on the street you are good to go.
Posted By: KEVIN_JAY Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
MJ use, medicinal or not, violates federal law and the 2d A. is a federal issue.


Nope. The 2nd is a "We the People" issue. We've allowed it to become a Federal Issue.
Posted By: DaveR Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
Until federal law changes, that's how it will be.

The W wants to use a topical THC oil for her shoulder. She a friend that uses it and she went off serious pain meds for the first time in many years. It has no effect as far as getting high, but does wonders it seems for things like bad shoulders, arthritis, etc. The W asked her doc about it, and he said he'd write her up a script so she could get the card. I told her don't do it....eventually these medical marijuana cards will wind up in some database, and she'd be screwed for ever possessing or owning another firearm.

Seems every other person that walks down the street here has a "medical marijuana card" for any host of b.s. reasons, but in some cases it seems to be quite legit. Too bad the Feds would rather have people hooked on opiate painkillers than they would for someone to rub some freakin' THC oil on a bad back or joints, but it is what it is. Until that changes, the W will not be getting that card.
Soon they will be using the card to deny auto and health insurance, loans, drivers licenses, child custody, but NOT FOOD STAMPS OR WELFARE.
Posted By: Scott F Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
Originally Posted by DaveR
Until federal law changes, that's how it will be.

The W wants to use a topical THC oil for her shoulder. She a friend that uses it and she went off serious pain meds for the first time in many years. It has no effect as far as getting high, but does wonders it seems for things like bad shoulders, arthritis, etc. The W asked her doc about it, and he said he'd write her up a script so she could get the card. I told her don't do it....eventually these medical marijuana cards will wind up in some database, and she'd be screwed for ever possessing or owning another firearm.

Seems every other person that walks down the street here has a "medical marijuana card" for any host of b.s. reasons, but in some cases it seems to be quite legit. Too bad the Feds would rather have people hooked on opiate painkillers than they would for someone to rub some freakin' THC oil on a bad back or joints, but it is what it is. Until that changes, the W will not be getting that card.


Exactly why I don't use topicals. I would in a heartbeat if the feds would allow it.
Originally Posted by KEVIN_JAY
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
MJ use, medicinal or not, violates federal law and the 2d A. is a federal issue.


Nope. The 2nd is a "We the People" issue. We've allowed it to become a Federal Issue.


Thanks for pointing that out

It's between we the people, and GOD.

Those black robed hoodlums damn sure shouldn't have any say in the matter.

GTC
Posted By: SCOOTERBUM Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
There r no laws, anymore. Ref: hi liar y vs DOJ.

Understand?
Posted By: Calhoun Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
Now this is California, so it lays the groundwork for interesting activities in the future.

1) Guns are registered in California, so I'm expecting state cops to be cross referencing the gun owner database with medical marijuana database and conducting house "visits" to make sure you are compliant with federal law. If they can't access the medical marijuana database at the moment due to privacy laws, an exception will be carved out in a year or two.

2) The gun owner themselves won't have to be the one with the medical marijuana card, I'm guessing it will be an address correlation so that kids/spouse/etc. will trigger it. Didn't know your kid had a card? Sucks to be you.

Remember, they're not after your guns... until they show up on your doorstep.
Posted By: Greyghost Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
Ruling effects all the western states! As to the feds enforcing laws regarding MJ, they enforce it any time its of a problem nature to warrant it...

Phil
Posted By: antlers Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
Originally Posted by RWE
So, the fed chooses to enforce federal marijuana laws when it comes to guns, but not when it comes to state sales?

Great point.

Bottom line...the Feds are rotten bastards to the Nth degree.
Posted By: Raeford Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
Originally Posted by DaveR
Until federal law changes, that's how it will be.

The W wants to use a topical THC oil for her shoulder. She a friend that uses it and she went off serious pain meds for the first time in many years. It has no effect as far as getting high, but does wonders it seems for things like bad shoulders, arthritis, etc. The W asked her doc about it, and he said he'd write her up a script so she could get the card. I told her don't do it....eventually these medical marijuana cards will wind up in some database, and she'd be screwed for ever possessing or owning another firearm.

Seems every other person that walks down the street here has a "medical marijuana card" for any host of b.s. reasons, but in some cases it seems to be quite legit. Too bad the Feds would rather have people hooked on opiate painkillers than they would for someone to rub some freakin' THC oil on a bad back or joints, but it is what it is. Until that changes, the W will not be getting that card.


MJ lobbyists aren't ponying up enough cash.....yet. Until they get at least even to big pharm and Beer nothings going to change.
Posted By: Calhoun Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
Originally Posted by Greyghost
Ruling effects all the western states! As to the feds enforcing laws regarding MJ, they enforce it any time its of a problem nature to warrant it...

Phil

Yep, affects multiple states. But I believe California is the worst one for putting a lot of effort into confiscating guns from people.

https://www.vera.org/projects/californias-armed-and-prohibited-persons-system/learn-more

And the results:

Posted By: RoninPhx Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
i have several clients/friends who own firearms businesses. What's funny is they require proof of I.D. with the paperwork. A guy is filling out a 4473 and pops out one of thosse medical m.j. cards. He is declined then gets jerked off. Did he even read the 4473?
Now the health care concern i go to, big in arizona, as a questionaire to be filled out that goes in the computer. One of the questions is on M.J. use. You think that isn't going to be cross indexed at some point?
Posted By: 12344mag Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
Originally Posted by RWE
So, the fed chooses to enforce federal marijuana laws when it comes to guns, but not when it comes to state sales?



Hmmmm....Boggles the mind does it not.
Posted By: 1minute Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
Quote
So if you buy your weed on the street you are good to go.


I suspect that is correct. Leave a paper trail with ones doctor, pharmacist, bank, or insurance company, and his/her use is well documented.
Posted By: Greyghost Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
Not hardly, you get pulled over, whether driving or just on the street with the drug, you'd better have that medical I.D. card!

Phil
Posted By: MadMooner Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
Here, LE looks for weed to be in the original packaging. Put it in a jar or someother container and they will confiscate it. Med cards don't seem to mean much anymore.

As to the ruling, makes sense to me. They are talking federal law.
Posted By: poboy Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
Wonder how much obama's weed cost.
Posted By: Steve Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
I personaly think the court got the law correct.

Bigger questions are should pot be illegal and why is a civil right limited without a conviction?
Posted By: 280shooter Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
I predicted this several years ago when many states were getting giddy about legalization.
Posted By: rem141r Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
just check the box next to No
Posted By: antlers Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
Originally Posted by rem141r
just check the box next to No

Yep. And have no qualms about it. At all.

The very notion that one needs the permission of the rotten a$$ government to exercise one's Constitutional right is preposterous.
Posted By: GunGeek Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
Question e says.

" Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to..."

So if you're not addicted to it and you have a weed card that makes you lawful... Why can't you honestly answer "no" to question e?
Posted By: Scott F Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/01/16
The 9th got it right. Even if it is legal in your state and you use pot and mark no on the form it is a federal felony. It is a risk I will not me taking.
Posted By: Calhoun Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/02/16
Originally Posted by GunGeek
Question e says.

" Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to..."

So if you're not addicted to it and you have a weed card that makes you lawful... Why can't you honestly answer "no" to question e?

Federal law says any use of it is illegal. Just because your city or county or state says something is legal doesn't mean it invalidates federal law.
Posted By: GunGeek Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/02/16
MJ legalization is making a lot of things really iffy. Now you can't buy a gun. The whole drug testing of employees where MJ is legal is some serious gray area. There's going to be a lot of bumpy roads with the MJ thing.
Posted By: 257wby Re: The 9th circus........ - 09/02/16
Just because you have a card doesn't mean you ever bought any medical mj. Hell I've had lots of prescriptions I've never filled. Dentist says if the pain gets too bad go get some Tylenol 3. The rx just lays on the counter.
© 24hourcampfire