Home
Posted By: jaguartx So, did they get to Assange? - 10/03/16
http://heatst.com/politics/october-...y-announcement-due-to-security-concerns/
[Linked Image]
He didn't cancel entirely, he just isn't speaking from the balcony.
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahba...nticipated-tuesday-announcement-n2226983

Quote
Julian Assange will still give his highly anticipated announcement on Tuesday, according to NBC reporter Jesse Rodriguez. It was initially planned to come from the balcony of London’s Ecuadorian Embassy, but was cancelled due to “security concerns.”

Rodriguez says the announcement will now be made over a video link at a Berlin press conference.
Hope he spills the rest of whatever evidence he has before he "commits" Arkancide.
Originally Posted by bruinruin
Hope he spills the rest of whatever evidence he has before he "commits" Arkancide.



And any good it does Trump will be quickly squandered by his next tweet...
Instapundit has a story out today that says that Hillary proposed a drone strike on Assange back in 2010 when she was Sec. of State. If he has anything, he'll bring it because he knows that his ass is dead if Hillary takes office.
You'd think he would spill it ASAP. Once he has already released the dirt, killing him doesn't do as much good.
Originally Posted by bellydeep
You'd think he would spill it ASAP. Once he has already released the dirt, killing him doesn't do as much good.


You underestimate revenge as a satisfying motive.
Money talks. So does fate.

Even if he had videos of her eating black babies alive, she would be elected. Trump's being the perfect shill and torpedoing all chances he would be elected, as planned by them. Weak minded people are once more to blame. This time they called themselves conservatives.
I think a life insurance on Assange, with yourself as the beneficiary, would be better than any other get-rich-quick scheme one could think up, if Hillary is elected.
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
And any good it does Trump will be quickly squandered by his next tweet...

Originally Posted by RickyD
Money talks. So does fate.
Even if he had videos of her eating black babies alive, she would be elected. Trump's being the perfect shill and torpedoing all chances he would be elected, as planned by them. Weak minded people are once more to blame. This time they called themselves conservatives.



I feel confident that the tens of thousands of citizens,attending Trump rallies,don't feel like "Gloomy Gusses".
Originally Posted by JoeBob
He didn't cancel entirely, he just isn't speaking from the balcony.


[Linked Image]
L'assange au balcon
Originally Posted by sportingspecialist
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
And any good it does Trump will be quickly squandered by his next tweet...

Originally Posted by RickyD
Money talks. So does fate.
Even if he had videos of her eating black babies alive, she would be elected. Trump's being the perfect shill and torpedoing all chances he would be elected, as planned by them. Weak minded people are once more to blame. This time they called themselves conservatives.



I feel confident that the tens of thousands of citizens,attending Trump rallies,don't feel like "Gloomy Gusses".
Me, too. You all just forgot he had to appeal to a whole lot more than 14 million people, or whatever he had from the primaries. And he could have. Truly! If only he could get out of his way. Apparently, he can't.

I believe I could have mounted a youtube campaign and beat Hillary. You too! Wish we had.
Originally Posted by sportingspecialist
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
And any good it does Trump will be quickly squandered by his next tweet...

Originally Posted by RickyD
Money talks. So does fate.
Even if he had videos of her eating black babies alive, she would be elected. Trump's being the perfect shill and torpedoing all chances he would be elected, as planned by them. Weak minded people are once more to blame. This time they called themselves conservatives.



I feel confident that the tens of thousands of citizens,attending Trump rallies,don't feel like "Gloomy Gusses".


I'm not being a "gloomy Gus" just keeping it real... After the convention, he was polling about even with Hillary...till he started tweeting. Same as last week after the debates...he was back up to even and ahead in most of the supposed "swing states"...till he started tweeting stupid schitt again.

Now he's down 10 points...again...if he isn't fuggin stupid, then he's trying to purposely throw the election....it's either/or and either way, it's not looking good for America right now.
Trump's beyond salvage, is an idiot of the 1st order & for whatever reason, has already blown the election.........it all over but the voting, which, just be be sure, will surely be rigged, big time.

We are completely & totally fu^cked................

MM
Even if trump was up in points he would lose....him and bill surely did have that phone card....
Assange will be toast shortly.................

MM
Trump will win in a land slide. Mark my word and this thread! As Reagan said . . . "trust the people."
Posted By: RWE Re: So, did they get to Assange? - 10/04/16
Originally Posted by OrangeOkie
Trump will win in a land slide. Mark my word and this thread! As Reagan said . . . "trust the people."


What can we mark if you are wrong?

Anyway, looks like Assange has his own schedule (and agenda).

Sure hope anyone that was simply waiting for Assange to help them out has a Plan B and has moved on to it...
Posted By: RJY66 Re: So, did they get to Assange? - 10/04/16
Originally Posted by OrangeOkie
Trump will win in a land slide. Mark my word and this thread! As Reagan said . . . "trust the people."


Hope you are right my friend. I think he still has a shot because I don't know that I trust the polls and even if they are correct there is still time, a couple of debates left, and the turnout wildcard.

But, it is kind of hard to trust the people after the last couple of presidential cycles. When Reagan made that quote we had way fewer idiots running around and voting. The 1980's seem like an alternate universe now.
Posted By: RWE Re: So, did they get to Assange? - 10/04/16
Looks like Julian made a donation pitch and agreed to release more documents regarding the election every week for ten weeks.

Since the election is a mere 5 weeks away, I'm not sure what documents dumped after that will do other than cause chaos.

Which may be what the [bleep] planned all along.

Nevertheless, I hope we really didn't rely on this guy to "help" out....
No October surprise.

http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecu...-surprise-at-wikileaks-anniversary-event

Quote
He also announced that the site had more than 1 million documents it planned to release before the end of the year, including documents on weapons, oil, Google, surveillance and the 2016 election. He promised the election documents would be released before November 8.

But Assange cautioned that the election leaks might not be the Clinton-buster Stone and Jones were anticipating, calling claims he is specifically stocking documents “intending to harm” the Democratic candidate “false,” saying he has been misquoted and there is an “attempt to personalize the publications.”

Ultimately, Assange left ambiguous which, if any, candidate the documents would benefit, though he did describe them as “significant.”
Originally Posted by OrangeOkie
Trump will win in a land slide. Mark my word and this thread! As Reagan said . . . "trust the people."


So, uh, how did Zero get elected?
Originally Posted by NeBassman
No October surprise.

http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecu...-surprise-at-wikileaks-anniversary-event

Quote
He also announced that the site had more than 1 million documents it planned to release before the end of the year, including documents on weapons, oil, Google, surveillance and the 2016 election. He promised the election documents would be released before November 8.

But Assange cautioned that the election leaks might not be the Clinton-buster Stone and Jones were anticipating, calling claims he is specifically stocking documents “intending to harm” the Democratic candidate “false,” saying he has been misquoted and there is an “attempt to personalize the publications.”

Ultimately, Assange left ambiguous which, if any, candidate the documents would benefit, though he did describe them as “significant.”


And previously said the info would put Hillary in jail.
Evil flourishes when good men do nothing. We whine we moan we bitch and complain yet we do nothing, we all get what we deserve. We are ALL an embarresement to our forefathers. Every revolution starts with one man, problem is ..............none of us have the balls to be that man. We get what we deserve.
© 24hourcampfire