Home
WASHINGTON – Democrats may have a major national security hacking scandal on their hands that’s on the brink of exploding into public view.

Investigators, including Capitol Police, have been looking into whether classified or other sensitive information has been hacked by former information technology, or IT, staffers employed by Democrats in Congress.
Now, a source has confirmed to WND that the problem is so big, it is being handled as a criminal matter. And the source says suspects will likely receive prison sentences.
A House committee that deals with security-related issues is cooperating with Capitol Police in their investigation, according to the source.
Politico initially reported two weeks ago that five House employees were under investigation for possible equipment theft and unauthorized access of House IT systems.
Then the Daily Caller reported the focus has been on three brothers, Abid, Imran and Jamal Awan, “suspected of compromising the networks of Democrats on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and House Committee on Foreign Affairs.”
The Awan brothers were all barred from access to House computer systems then fired, apparently sometime in the last 10 days, after the story initially broke.
Last week, Frontpage Magazine reported the brothers are Muslims from Pakistan, but that has not been reported elsewhere and WND could not independently confirm it.
The brothers were not employed by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence or the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, but their services were shared by the offices of numerous Democratic Party lawmakers.
A spokesman for House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence or House Committee, or HPSCI, chairman Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., told WND they are confident the IT staffers had no access to committee computer systems and that they could not have accessed sensitive data stored there.
Spokesman Jack Langer also said the committee leadership has no reason to believe any classified HPSCI information was compromised.
WND asked representatives for the Foreign Affairs Committee if they had the same confidence their computer system had not been compromise but did not receive a response by the time this story was published.
The fact that Capitol Police have acknowledged there is an investigation, but the HPSCI is confident its computer system was not compromised, suggests investigators may be looking into whether classified or sensitive material may have been illegally accessed on the individual computer systems of the Democratic lawmakers on the committee who employed the Awan brothers.
The three Democratic lawmakers who employed the Awan brothers and who are on the HPSCI include:
Rep. Andre Carson, D-Ind.
Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif.
Rep. Joaquín Castro, D-Texas
Carson is the ranking member on HPSCI’s Emerging Threats subcommittee and also serves on the Department of Defense Intelligence and Overhead Architecture subcommittee.
He is also a Muslim who has what the Center for Security Policy calls “extensive and longstanding ties to organizations and individuals associated with the Muslim Brotherhood.”
Two years ago, the center documented those ties in a paper that said:
“Among those with whom Rep. Carson has been involved as a guest speaker, panelist, fundraiser, recipient of funds, etc., are: the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and a number of its chapters across the country; the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA); the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA); the Muslim American Society (MAS); and the Brotherhood’s new proto-political party, the U.S. Council of Muslim Organizations (USCMO).”
The Justice Department named CAIR and ISNA as unindicted co-conspirators in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation trial, a criminal plot to provide material support to Hamas terrorists. USCMO and ICNA were also implicated. Federal prosecutors referred to MAS as the “overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood.”
WND contacted representatives for Carson and the other two Democrats on the HPSCI who employed the Awan brothers.
WND relayed word to them that the HPSCI spokesman was confident that the Democrats’ IT staffers had no access to HPSCI computer systems and that they could not have obtained sensitive data stored there.

However, since the former employees were still under investigation by Capitol Police, WND asked: “Are you confident you had no sensitive or classified material on your own system those IT employees may have accessed? Are you checking?”
WND did not receive a single response.
Imran Awan also worked for Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D- Fla., who famously had her own catastrophic email hack while serving as chairman of the Democratic National Committee during the 2016 presidential campaign.
WND also asked Wasserman Schultz’s office if she was confident she had no sensitive or classified material on her own system that Awan may have accessed and whether the office was looking into what information might have been accessed during the breach. There was no response.
The source said some of the chairs of the committees looking into the Democrats’ growing hacking scandal might comment.
WND asked Rep. Susan Brooks, R-Ind., chairwoman of the House Ethics committee, and Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, chairman of the House Homeland Security committee, if they could confirm that the hacking scandal was as serious as the source had stated. But they did not respond.
WND also contacted Capitol Police spokeswoman Eva Malecki in an attempt to confirm the source’s claim that there was a criminal investigation likely to lead to arrests.
On Feb. 4, Malecki had told the Daily Caller the investigation was still ongoing and that arrests had not been made.
At the time this story was published, Malecki had not yet responded to WND’s inquiry.
Meanwhile, conservatives in Congress have been growing increasingly frustrated that the Democrats’ hacking scandal, with major national security

“I’m for an investigation — I hope to do it,” said Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, on Tuesday.
He said he would discuss the possibility with Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah.
“The facts regarding technology procurement and potentially illegal violations of the House IT network by several Democratic staffers is very concerning,” he added.
Philip Haney, a former Department of Homeland Security officer and co-author of “See Something, Say Nothing,” a book about his effort to expose the U.S. governments capitulation to Islamic supremacists, said the case will be a bellwether.
“This particular breach of security will reveal how seriously our three branches of government actually take the threat posed by what appears to be a network of Muslim operatives, who have managed to soak their way into the very heart of our constitutional republic,” he said.
“Let’s hope that this scandal isn’t just swept under the rug, or allowed to fade quietly into the background, like so many others that have, but instead becomes a case study in how our elected officials defend the Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic.
In addition to the Democrats contacted Wednesday, WND made dozens of calls and sent dozens of emails on Tuesday asking lawmakers who might have hired the Awan brothers for comment and an update on the status of the investigation.
A spokesman for Rep. Cedric Richmond, D-La., responded tersely, “Can’t comment on this one.”
A spokeswoman in the office of Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo., said it was a “personnel matter,” and “that’s all I’m going to say.”
Also contacted, without generating a response, were representatives for Democrats Luis Guiterez, Jim Himes, Terri Sewell, Mike Quigley, Eric Swalwell, Patrick Murphy, Lois Frankel, Ted Lieu, Robin Kelly, Tammy Duckworth, Mark Takano and John Sarbanes.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/02/prison-t...al-security-scandal/#GmgtqhkxpWsLm8vw.99
Hang 'em all
Is WND a good source?
The more you peel back that DC onion the worse it smells.
Originally Posted by OSU_Sig
Is WND a good source?



They are right more than wrong
Originally Posted by FieldGrade
The more you peel back that DC onion the worse it smells.


...and the more tears you shed for your country.
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Originally Posted by OSU_Sig
Is WND a good source?



They are right more than wrong

I hope so. I don't hear much about wnd and haven't seen this anywhere else.
Maybe its a stretch, but hacking classified government data might lead to prison time.
Originally Posted by OSU_Sig
Is WND a good source?


Nope.

Alex Jones is a nut case.
Originally Posted by bigfish9684
Originally Posted by FieldGrade
The more you peel back that DC onion the worse it smells.


...and the more tears you shed for your country.

I hear you.....the lies, deception, and down right evil are mind boggling.

I don't think we'll ever really know the depth.
Yeah, and Hillary is gonna be prosecuted too.......
WND doesn't have anything to do with alex jones grin



http://www.wnd.com/
I'm from the sho me state

So I'll believe it when I see it

Other than politically connected unions anyone that mismanaged a pension fund like pols have social security would already be in prison

They make rules for us to live by, not for them


If trump truly drains the swamp that's D.C. There'll only be some crack hos and Marion berry left
Originally Posted by OSU_Sig
Is WND a good source?


sometimes. They were among the first to report on Bill Clinton's sexcapades
Part of the reason the collective Left is screaming so bad about "the Russians".
So this wild eyed democrat push into russian spying and collusion is to divert attention. Thought as much. Any time the left accuses the right of something, you can bet it is a preemptive strike to draw attention away from the fact that THEY are doing exactly what they accuse US of doing. Schumer even said we have to watch out for the Trump administration destroying emails, etc. You know, like Hillary did.
So how much have you seen on the main stream manipulators about these 3 towelheads hacking Govt. servers, compared to the leaks on Flynn?
Commie crooks
WND's owner is a Clinton supporter. They put out just enough good info to have some credibility, but I'm convinced they purposely put out disinformation too.

Nothing reported in this article isn't verifiable, so it's probably pretty good. But, do you agree with the way they connected the dots?
Won't happen.
Originally Posted by bigfish9684
Originally Posted by FieldGrade
The more you peel back that DC onion the worse it smells.


...and the more tears you shed for your country.


Exactly.
Don't get me wrong. I'm still a proud American. At this time, but I'm still an angry American.
Its a national security risk that has happened. Clearly a violation of the Espionage Act. AG Sessions has to get subpoenas out for those in command. The "signal division" of the NSA is a specialized small group of individuals.

The Russian diplomat was listened to by the NSA but when Flynn or any other American was identified on the phone, that listening session transcription must end until a warrant was obtained for the transcript.

Major major violations of Federal Statutes have occurred. All in the devotion to Obama and to bring down Trumps presidency.
If this is allowed to "pass by" and ignored, there will be significant problems with any security matter that the NSA will deal with or is privy to. This is big league problem beyond that of Gen. Flynn's dismissal.

A shadow government is present working against POTUS.
Originally Posted by bigwhoop
Its a national security risk that has happened. Clearly a violation of the Espionage Act. AG Sessions has to get subpoenas out for those in command. The "signal division" of the NSA is a specialized small group of individuals.

The Russian diplomat was listened to by the NSA but when Flynn or any other American was identified on the phone, that listening session transcription must end until a warrant was obtained for the transcript.

Major major violations of Federal Statutes have occurred. All in the devotion to Obama and to bring down Trumps presidency.
This.
Originally Posted by OSU_Sig
Is WND a good source?
Some people on here don't think so, but some people on here think most anything.
Will this be bigger than Watergate?

Surely haven't seen any coverage of this in the New York Times or Washington Post lately...............are they prejudiced?

MM
Fox had a piece this morning claiming the I C is withholding Natl Security information from the Administration......... leaving stuff out of Trumps briefings.
Trump doesn't measure up to their standards.............but evidently, The Muslim did.

What a convoluted mindset & thought process............the most treasonous president ever being considered competent & trustworthy, but Trump, who's been in office less than a month, is not.

How completely fu^cked up are we?

MM
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by OSU_Sig
Is WND a good source?


Nope.

Alex Jones is a nut case.


Aren't you a nut case?
Originally Posted by OSU_Sig
Is WND a good source?


They "are me" but I'm more careful.
Originally Posted by MontanaMan
Trump doesn't measure up to their standards.............but evidently, The Muslim did.

What a convoluted mindset & thought process............the most treasonous president ever being considered competent & trustworthy, but Trump, who's been in office less than a month, is not.

How completely fu^cked up are we?

MM


Quite!

We have way too many anti-American, Muslims embedded everywhere. Does one think they are here to inculcate American culture and become part of it, accepting our laws and customs?

Answer that and you have your answer.
© 24hourcampfire