I have a 026 Stihl with a "16 bar that I have been running Oregon chains on mostly because of the savings compared to the Stihl brand. Any one here think the Stihl chains are worth the extra money?
Grassy azz.. BP...
Yes,
Stihl chains are harder than any other brand, I used to sharpen them and it took about half again as long to sharpen a Stihl chain than it did any other brand.
I would put Oregon chain as second best as far as strength and quality go.
If you want a chain that really lasts pick yourself up a Stihl carbide chain, you'll wonder why you never change chains.
Also remember to get the correct chain for the job.....Full chisel chain for clean wood and semi chisel wood for dirty wood.
Dirty wood would be the wood that is lying on the ground or wood on the outside of the forest or wood on the edges of dirt fields, clean wood would be the wood on the inside of the forest.
Yup, Stihl chains is several points harder than other brands.
The question is what type of wood are you cutting and what causes your chain to dull. If you're running your chain through dirty wood, or just can't keep the chain out of the dirt, then there is no advantage to the harder Stihl chain. If you're quickly dulling your chain due to running it in the dirt, just go with the cheapest chain you can find and change it out regularly.
If you're running in clean wood and want to run all day without swapping out loops, I'd suggest using Stihl chain.
The biggest key no matter what type of chain you run is run sharp chain, swap loops as soon as the chain dulls, and properly sharpen the chain. Properly sharpened chain has every tooth filed to the same angle, and the depth gauge set to keep the depth of cut the same as the chain is sharpened. A couple licks with a file is not properly sharpening a chain, it's a quick field touch up for a chain that is starting to dull, but no more.