... Uh Oh ... Evelyn Farkas admits first hand knowledge that the Obongo Administration spied on candidate and President-Elect Trump's transition team to gather "intelligence" for political use, and then she (unwittingly) outs herself as the key source of a "New York Times" report that discussed Obongo officials leaking classified information to the media.
To take her admission at face value, then you give credence to her assertion that everyone was squirreling away info on Trump's alleged Russian connection before he took office so that it wouldn't get buried.
1. The MSNBC interview occurred on March 2, 2017, and it is just NOW getting attention. God forbid that the leftists at MSNBC would "connect the dots" and actually report on the "smoking gun" allegations made by a former Obongo Administration Official.
2. Evelyn Farkas has a M.A. and a Ph.D. from The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy (a BIG TIME - prestigious school if you intend to go into governmental service ... especially foreign service.) She also served as an assistant professor for 4 years at the U.S. Marine Corp. Staff and Command College. She is a foreign and defense policy expert. At least, credential / academic-wise, she is not a (readily apparent) idiot.
3. As a "Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense" ... she was actually somewhat low in the pecking-order or food chain at the Defense Department. (You have to wonder just what level of security clearance that she had ... and how many others in the pecking-order or food chain, above her and below her, had access to all this political "intelligence?")
Another key point that was brought out on Hannity tonight: Apparently when Farkas saw / read the intelligence report, SHE WAS A PRIVATE CITIZEN, WORKING AS AN ADVISER FOR HITLARY, and not employed by The Defense Department.
If that is true .... how the hell did she get access to those reports ??
Apparently she left the Obongo Administration in October, 2015. If she left in 2015, I seriously doubt she had a security clearance after her departure.
With this information ... with these admissions, I say it's time to empanel a Grand Jury ----> Put The Squeeze On Her (even is she offered immunity) -----> So That She Can Implicate The Big Fish - Higher Ups.
I think this was fairly well-orchestrated and that she didn't have "a wild hair" and do this on her own.
Another key point that was brought out on Hannity tonight: Apparently when Farkas saw / read the intelligence report, SHE WAS A PRIVATE CITIZEN, WORKING AS AN ADVISER FOR HITLARY, and not employed by The Defense Department.
If that is true .... how the hell did she get access to those reports ??
Apparently she left the Obongo Administration in October, 2015. If she left in 2015, I seriously doubt she had a security clearance after her departure.
Wonder why her resume was in the WikiLeaks Podesta e-mail dump? Was she promised a job by Hitlary after she assumed she was going to be elected? Hmmm ....
This just keeps getting better and better. It's like a giant jig saw puzzle and I imagine there is a team of people somewhere putting the pieces together before they drop the hammer.
I still think the only reason she "came forward" was to lay the seed that they did the dirty deeds in order to secure the alleged damning information against Trump.
They know they are busted and are trying their best to minimize their actions, or at best justify them.
As far as this squirrel goes, think Lois Lerner.
When she gets in front of a body, she'll plead the fifth.
I think the folks barack had working for him are so disconnected from reality, so 'empowered' by the fact that for 8 years, they were totally bullet proof, that they forget they are now vulnerable.
I think the folks barack had working for him are so disconnected from reality, so 'empowered' by the fact that for 8 years, they were totally bullet proof, that they forget they are now vulnerable.
They ALL thought they were above the law.
Recent history has proven them right.
That needs to change. Those responsible need to be taken to jail and put on trial. A trial is the only way the public will ever know the truths involved.
I think the folks barack had working for him are so disconnected from reality, so 'empowered' by the fact that for 8 years, they were totally bullet proof, that they forget they are now vulnerable.
They ALL thought they were above the law.
Recent history has proven them right.
That needs to change. Those responsible need to be taken to jail and put on trial. A trial is the only way the public will ever know the truths involved.
They had done so much "above the law" stuff that this was normal and minor in their minds.
As Rush just noted, she revealed they had to have started surveillance on Trump back in 2015 in June or July. She left her job there in Sept òr Oct 2015 and it was going on then.
At that time Bush was the one everyone expected to take the nomination. Were they tapping Bush for a Russian connection.