Revolver Forcing Cones - 02/19/11
I've acknowledged being new to handgunning, and told about my mishap with a squib load in a S&W 642. BTW, it was not a total loss, and is getting a new barrel installed at the factory. I was lucky.
Meanwhile, I picked up another 642, this one with a 2.5" barrel that I posted about in a thread about POI. That one was exchanged for a new one, because the forcing cone was rough with tool marks. The replacement is much better, but not perfect. Pic of the rough one below. Not impressed with the quality control.
While I was the gun show, I also looked at a Taurus snubby. What I noticed was that the forcing cone on the Taurus was much shallower, and also highly polished vs. either Smith.
So this leads to a question. How important is the forcing cone on a revolver, and does the angle make any practical difference?
Paul
Meanwhile, I picked up another 642, this one with a 2.5" barrel that I posted about in a thread about POI. That one was exchanged for a new one, because the forcing cone was rough with tool marks. The replacement is much better, but not perfect. Pic of the rough one below. Not impressed with the quality control.
While I was the gun show, I also looked at a Taurus snubby. What I noticed was that the forcing cone on the Taurus was much shallower, and also highly polished vs. either Smith.
So this leads to a question. How important is the forcing cone on a revolver, and does the angle make any practical difference?
Paul