Good heads up there Brad....I'll have to check mine out.
And just so TAK doesn't have to say it I'll do it for him.
"Thats why you don't buy a piece of crap, no good shooting Kimber."
Oh I was SHOCKED that Kimber designed and shipped such a rifle! Kimber Montana owners are about as deluded as rack-grade 1911 nuts. Both are convinced that the Kimber is a "free lunch", IE a $2500 gun for less than half the money. You pay your money and you take your chances.
Probably amazing that mine still works given it spends almost as many days a field a year as you do on here typing about how horrid Kimbers are....nah I don't carry it quite that much...never mind
I have no dog in this fight, but, found the above riposte by "lanche" kinda funny, NO offence to anyone.
Anyway, as to rifle "quality" in recent years and in some rather costly and "renowned" makes:
In the spring of 1994, IIRC, after saving for FOUR years to do so, I finally bought a lovely Dakota 76 Classic, excellent Q-sawn English wood, in my favourite .338WM, from the best gunstore I have ever seen, "Kesselring's" of Alger,WA. This, was shortly before Klinton and our former vile Liberal government conspired to make it impossible for we Canadians, to buy guns, ammo, etc, in the USA and bring them home into our once-proud, now declining nation.
I was super thrilled to get this and add it to my growing collection with my original, still fine shape P-64 Alaskan, .338WM and a second one of those,re-blued and my "truck gun". The .338WM is about the BEST all-around cartridge for serious hunting and wilderness work in BC and is very popular here, so, I had my "Dream Gun" at age 47.
I found it would NOT SHOOT and in those days, I was shooting 2000- 6000 big bore rounds per year and was a pretty fair shot with .338s, ,375s and so on. Then, it would NOT cycle the 2nd and 3rd rounds from the mag correctly......for use in BC's mountains with our large and growing Grizzly population????? I was PIZZED OFF and it went back, TWICE, for adjustment and some custom work.
When, I finally began to seriously workup loads and "tune" this rifle, I was NOT impressed with the groups and that feeding issue was STILL evident. One evening, in my gun room, doing the neverending maintenance that a large and fairly valuable collection requires, I suddenly thought that the "W" spring in this gorgeous piece seemed a bit "weak" as contrasted with my various P-64-70s. So, just for giggles, I swapped an original, mint, spare P-64 spring into the Dakota and THAT did it.
The rifle began to feed like one wants all his favourite rifles to and ejected all four rounds to the same spot some five feet to my right. I was REALLY happy as I was considering selling this and trying to find and buy another P-64, did so, twice more, but, that's another tale. By, this time, I had managed to develop loads with RE-22 and H-4350 using the 250 NP and Horn.IL bullets that shot VERY, VERY well and had also found that the Federal "HE" ammo, with the 225 TB slug was sub-moa in my now "keeper" Dakota.
In 2010, having found a fine Micky "Hill Country" stock on that other site, and with some custom parts, Ralf Martini, customized this piece for me and it is 8lbs.7oz. of simply superb "mountain rifle". So, even these costly limited production rifles CAN and seemingly DO have various "glitches" when we buy them and it just requires patience,some gun knowledge and testing to get them to where we need them to be, I expect the Kimbers, to be much the same.
It WOULD be nice if every rifle came to each buyer, fully "tuned" and shooting .35" at 100, Buutttttttt, we all know that such ideals are seldom attained in the "real world". The advice given freely and as friends here can be a huge help in getting all of our gear into the most dependable condition possible.
BUT, then, the "problem" arises, now, I NEED a Kimber 84L,.25-06 because my .270s and .280s are too "big" for hunting Wolves and Coyotes....or, so, I tell my "CEO", with my best innocent grin...........