Home
Posted By: johnw Somebody Knows... - 05/10/16
But not me.

Why certain rifles prefer deeper seated bullets. Makes no sense to me, but it happens. Can't explain it but will listen to any and all theories.

I seldom actually load into the lands, but accuracy wise that is more logical than deeper seating.

I thought that bullet profile might make a diff, but apparently not in this particular rifle. Both the Ballistic Yip and the Amax do well seated quite deep, by my standards.

The Amax is rough on groundhogs...
Posted By: jwall Re: Somebody Knows... - 05/10/16
Originally Posted by johnw

I thought that bullet profile might make a diff, but apparently not in this particular rifle. Both the /< Ballistic Yip \>and the Amax do well seated quite deep, by my standards.
.


I guess I've missed the Ballistic --YIP-- bullets . laugh
Are they better than the Ballistic Tips ? whistle




Seriously now, I've seated bullets near the lands and SHORT because of mag restrictions.

When I have a new to me rifle and have no idea 'where' to start, I often use Factory COAL. It's surprising how factory ammo CAN be accurate in many diff rifles. They must NO something. <G>

After Factory COAL, if I'm looking for better accuracy I seat OUT farther if possible.

At times it's simply T & E.

Good Luck

Jerry
Posted By: 16bore Re: Somebody Knows... - 05/10/16
Barnes at the front of the first driving band have always done well across multiple chamberings/rigs for me.

Posted By: bobnob17 Re: Somebody Knows... - 05/11/16
I by default try to get them .010 from the lands, if possible within mag length.

When that doesn't work, I might try a few around 0.030. I've never ever found going any further off the lands does any better. They mightn't be much worse, but never better.


Posted By: wareagle700 Re: Somebody Knows... - 05/11/16
My understanding is it has to do with the bullet ogive design, tangent vs. secant, and the individual chamber. Some bullets, like the Sierra Matchking, prefer a jump whereas something like a Berger VLD or JLK often do best in the lands.

I always start load testing by loading the bullet either .020" off the lands, one caliber depth into the case, or max mag length, depending on the bullet and rifle. Once I find a good flat node at the right charge weight, I check seating depth .010" in each direction to see if groups tighten up. Rarely is any load development required after that unless you don't get the accuracy or velocity you were wanting.
Posted By: 16bore Re: Somebody Knows... - 05/11/16
I go Stick mode; kiss, pressure, rock on. Starting with a kiss at your maximum safe charge only leaves 2 directions to go instead of four.
Posted By: jt402 Re: Somebody Knows... - 05/11/16
I do not reload for fun and relaxation, but because of need. Two observations.

Factory ammo shoots better than it used to. I have had outstanding results from selected Hornaday and Federal loadings.

Factory ammo rarely touches the lands.

My loading is based upon necessity and need. Necessity for .218 Bee and .219 Zipper. Need for the right bullet at the right price for several offerings. Although ammo is the cheapest part of the hunt, premium ammo is pricey. I tend to settle for good enough. I usually get reasonabally good groups without going to the lands. Best,

Jack
Posted By: 16bore Re: Somebody Knows... - 05/11/16
I'm looking forward to trying the new ELD-X 7RM loads from Hornady. If they go sub MOA it could change things.

Reloading is like watching paint dry for me anymore.
© 24hourcampfire