I'm looking at a 30-06 in a MT 8400 and was wondering what the differences are between the older 8400 and the newer 84L. I've had 8400 in WSM and currently have an 84L in 270 but have never owned an 8400 in the standard long action calibers. I think the major difference is the 8400 is a bit heavier. How much? Are fit/feel the same as the 84L?

Thanks.

The 8400's in standard calibers are heavy and clunky feeling compared to the 84's.
They aren't a bad rifle but feel more like a Model 70, Rem 700 or Howa 1500 compared to the svelte and lively handling of the Kimber 84's both short and long action.

Just my 2 cents.

IMO they handle worse than 700's etc.

I'd stay the hell away from an 8400 LA.

Yup!....as Stevenson says.

The 84s magazine area lays in your hand like carrying a nice 99. Much more pleasant to carry IMO.

Got it guys! I don't actually have the gun to fondle - its for sale in the internets. I really like the 84L but don't care for the newer version with the knurled nut at the muzzle. Looking for an 84L.........

The 8400's feel like they're pregnant

The 8400's can chamber for belted magnums and has a H&H length box IIRC; while the 84L is designed around standard cases and limited OAL.