Home
I have a hankering for a pump. Not sure why, just do. I will probably get a carbine model to hunt out of tree stands in the woods. What are the major differences between the model 760 and the 7600? Was the 7600 improved over the 760? Does one particular model have a better trigger or better feeding? Any reason I should pick one model over another?

Thanks,

Dan
Posted By: CP Re: Remington 7600 Pump versus 760 - 10/20/16
http://www.remingtonsociety.org/remington-model-760-model-7600-rifles/

Might help a little. CP.
The 760 was more expensive to produce the cost of the 7600 is higher!
The main improvement of the 7600 over the 760 is how the slide/magazine is isolated from the barrel.
The 760 has threaded holes for aperature sights. The 7600's I've seen don't.
There's a lot more cartridge selections for the 760.

If you shoot off the bench the 760 requires a little more finess.

I like both. I only have bought 7600's in the last twenty years though. (Other than a couple 141's.)

7600 models are tapped and threaded from the factory for peep sights, on top of the receiver.
Slidell -

The older the 760s are you will see much more drop in the stock. The later 760s have noticeably less drop.

As for the triggers, that is an individual gun thing- IME. Some are pretty nice, some not so much, and some horrible. I had a M Six in 30-06 that had a lot of travel, creep, and was heavy. There is no rule of thumb from what I've seen.

I like/prefer the 7600 stocks to the 760s but mostly...

I prefer the new style bolt of the 7600/Six. IIRC the 7600s have 9 (less anyway) larger lugs. The 760s have more and smaller lugs. I don't have a 760 to compare so I can't remember exactly the difference in number.

Regardless, there are a lot of people who use and like the 760s as well as the 7600s. Look around at gun shops, pawn shops, etc. and see what you can find and compare.

Jerry
The 76/7600 series has 3 lugs...the 760 is the one with 9. From the 760 on up they all used basically the same trigger group, but I agree, some felt better than others. It is not hard to do a trigger job on these rifles.
They were all "long" length actions, even though many were chambered in what is generally regarded as short action cartridges. Nice thing about that is that you can seat your bullet out to touch the lands {if that is the best for accuracy in your rifle} and not have a magazine length issue.
They are pretty accurate rifles, many will rival the accuracy of a bolt gun. The Model Six was the fancy one, it had high grade wood, a better polish and blue and a monte carlo cheek piece. It also had a neat "flare" around the forend. The buttstocks are the same configuration and will interchange with the 20 gauge 870.
I recently built a 760 in 260 caliber with a Shilen barrel and Model Six stocks.
I always used the 760 and my dad used the 7600. I never noticed that one was any better than the other.
Slidell -

Here's a pic from the Remington 1981 catalog showing the bolt of the Model 4, 6, 7400, & 7600 rifles.
[Linked Image]

The bolt of the 760s had several small locking lugs. As you can see the 7600/Sixes have LESS but larger lugs.

Jerry
I like the raised cheek-piece Monte Carlo style stocks on the 760 BDLs with the basket weave "checkering" that were made between 1966 and 1979. My current #2 elk rifle is a 760 BDL in 270. It shoots MOAish groups with Hornady American Whitetail and Winchester/Olin Power Max Bonded 140 grain factory loads, so I'm satisfied that if I do my part, the rifle/cartridge combination will do its part.
260 -

The Model Six has the raised cheek piece M C that the 7600s don't have.
I also like/prefer the flared fore end.

[Linked Image]

If you look close at the pistol grip, it has a smaller circumference that I like.

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

Yeah, I like my Model Sixes.

Jerry
You're the envy of many Pennsylvanians. :-)
Originally Posted by jwall
260 -

The Model Six has the raised cheek piece M C that the 7600s don't have.
I also like/prefer the flared fore end.

[Linked Image]

If you look close at the pistol grip, it has a smaller circumference that I like.

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

Yeah, I like my Model Sixes.

Jerry


I have 4 760s; 2 in 270 and 2 in 30-06. But, just between you and me, if I'm going to hunt deer in tight cover, I'm far more likely to carry a Winchester 100 in 308 with 17" barrel or an almost as short and handy Ruger 44 International.
I believe the Model Six is destined to become one of the great American Classic rifles. I didn't realize they were so rare, but someone posted a few days ago on another thread that only some 36,000 were ever made.
I also like the "enhanced" model 7600 with the engraved receiver. Been looking for one of those for a while.
This is one of those rifles that...if you could just put it all together in one...engraved receiver of the enhanced, the rear step like on those BDL Deluxe model 760's, the stocks and bluing of the Model Six.
I missed a Premier grade 760 that was for sale a few years back. It was the one on the 1975 Remington catalog, out of the custom shop. I guess you cant have it all.
Originally Posted by msinc
I believe the Model Six is destined to become one of the great American Classic rifles. I didn't realize they were so rare, but someone posted a few days ago on another thread that only some 36,000 were ever made.
I also like the "enhanced" model 7600 with the engraved receiver. Been looking for one of those for a while.
This is one of those rifles that...if you could just put it all together in one...engraved receiver of the enhanced, the rear step like on those BDL Deluxe model 760's, the stocks and bluing of the Model Six.
I missed a Premier grade 760 that was for sale a few years back. It was the one on the 1975 Remington catalog, out of the custom shop. I guess you cant have it all.

Interesting about the 6. I wonder how many .243s were made. There is a very low round count 6 in my safe in .243.
Originally Posted by Autofive
7600 models are tapped and threaded from the factory for peep sights, on top of the receiver.

The only holes on top of a 7600 receiver are there for scope bases. This is true for 760s as well but Williams does make a rec. sight that is adapted to use the rear two holes.
Originally Posted by smarquez

Interesting about the 6. I wonder how many .243s were made. There is a very low round count 6 in my safe in .243.


Well, here's the % of 36,236 Model Sixes produced.
Originally Posted by hillbillybear

The article lists the Model 6 figures as follows:

36,236 total units produced. Production breakdown:

.30/06 50%

.270 29%

.243 10%

.308 8%

6MM 3%


Jerry
Originally Posted by moosemike
You're the envy of many Pennsylvanians. :-)


grin

All I can say is, they shouldn't have let them get out of State.
whistle wink

Them Amish are a little slow to "progress" grin

Jerry
I'd prefer the Six, then the 7600. But there's nothing wrong with the 760.

If a 35 Remington, the 141 or 14 would be the best, IMO. Talk about a smooth action...

If you decide on a 14 or a 141 keep in mind that the 25 and 32 Remington's cartridge cases are quite hard to come by. I do have some 30 Remington cases made from 30-30 cases -- the rims were turned off. The only factory loads I have for the 30 Remington are full metal jacket. I have only a couple 25 Remington cases and no 32's, but they can easily be formed from the easier (not to easy) to find 30 Remington's.
The 7600 is a better rifle than the 760 by a factor of 10.
Originally Posted by jwall

Here's a pic from the Remington 1981 catalog showing the bolt of the Model 4, 6, 7400, & 7600 rifles.
[Linked Image]


[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
-----------------AND-----------
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]

1981 was a very good year ! !

Those were the days. +/- $300.00

Jerry
Originally Posted by jwall


[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]


Here's the pic of 7600.

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]

Jerry
Originally Posted by Steelhead
The 7600 is a better rifle than the 760 by a factor of 10.


I'd love to hear why? Not because I disagree with you but because I never have been able to choose one over the other.
Mike -

I think the larger bolt lugs are better but....

There are thousands of 760s still shucking and killing game.

The 760s can't be that bad.

Jerry
Originally Posted by moosemike
Originally Posted by Steelhead
The 7600 is a better rifle than the 760 by a factor of 10.


I'd love to hear why? Not because I disagree with you but because I never have been able to choose one over the other.


Yeah, I'd kinda like to hear a factor of one, let alone 10.....

On another note, someone mentioned the 141, which was I guess a "predecessor" of the 760/7600 series. I have one that is unfired from 1937. It is a 35 Remington caliber. I have to wonder, how many times Remington got sued when the owners sheared the end of their finger off while opening the bolt to unload the thing.
Originally Posted by msinc
Originally Posted by moosemike
Originally Posted by Steelhead
The 7600 is a better rifle than the 760 by a factor of 10.


I'd love to hear why? Not because I disagree with you but because I never have been able to choose one over the other.


Yeah, I'd kinda like to hear a factor of one, let alone 10.....

On another note, someone mentioned the 141, which was I guess a "predecessor" of the 760/7600 series. I have one that is unfired from 1937. It is a 35 Remington caliber. I have to wonder, how many times Remington got sued when the owners sheared the end of their finger off while opening the bolt to unload the thing.


American wasn't a litigious society back then. If a person screwed up, he/she usually took responsibility for screwing up. I've never seen anyone hurt themselves cycling a Remington 14/141 action, but I've seen several people gouge a chunk of flesh out of themselves when cycling a Winchester 1897 pump gun.
Originally Posted by moosemike
Originally Posted by Steelhead
The 7600 is a better rifle than the 760 by a factor of 10.


I'd love to hear why? Not because I disagree with you but because I never have been able to choose one over the other.


Sweet Jesus, the stupid runs deep.

10 x 760 = 7600
laugh

Thanks for the laugh Scott......
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by moosemike
Originally Posted by Steelhead
The 7600 is a better rifle than the 760 by a factor of 10.


I'd love to hear why? Not because I disagree with you but because I never have been able to choose one over the other.


Sweet Jesus, the stupid runs deep.

10 x 760 = 7600


laugh
Well S H,

we all can't be savants.

Jerry

I'll see how long it takes for you to figure that one.
I like them all but the Six is the coolest.
Originally Posted by jwall
Well S H,

we all can't be savants.


Jerry


Only on the 'Fire is the definition of savant being a person with an IQ over 30.
Originally Posted by MagMarc
I like them all but the Six is the coolest.


That's worse than a 760 by a factor of 126.6667



The new mathman grin
Originally Posted by MagMarc
The new mathman grin


Apparently that would be having the ability of counting to 11 with my shoes on.
Not because of mathman
It's apparently quite a skill to some of the posters here wink
Well, at least to Yankees anyways.
Originally Posted by Steelhead

Only on the 'Fire is the definition of savant being a person with an IQ over 30.


Sorry, wrong answer.

Originally Posted by jwall
Originally Posted by Steelhead

Only on the 'Fire is the definition of savant being a person with an IQ over 30.


Sorry, wrong answer.



See, too stupid to know that no question was asked.

Congrats?
Here are my 760s
222
223
And a 7615 in 223
[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by jwall
Well S H,
we all can't be savants.
Jerry

Only on the 'Fire is the definition of savant being a person with an IQ over 30.

Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by Steelhead

Only on the 'Fire is the definition of savant being a person with an IQ over 30.


See, too stupid to know that no question was asked.
Congrats?

Well, S H,
Who asked what's the definition of savant? You - assumed - and proceeded to give an answer.


You STILL don't have a clue! ! Clueless !!


Jerry
Some forearms on the 760's had a tendency to rattle. Not so much, if at all, on the later models.....
Originally Posted by jwall
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by jwall
Well S H,
we all can't be savants.
Jerry

Only on the 'Fire is the definition of savant being a person with an IQ over 30.

Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by Steelhead

Only on the 'Fire is the definition of savant being a person with an IQ over 30.


See, too stupid to know that no question was asked.
Congrats?

Well, S H,
Who asked what's the definition of savant? You - assumed - and proceeded to give an answer.


You STILL don't have a clue! ! Clueless !!


Jerry


What do you expect from the New Jersey southerner? He needs to rail against Yankees at least once a day everyday to convince himself he's not one. Hence his post. I pity him, he's a small man in so many ways.

Originally Posted by mmgravy
Some forearms on the 760's had a tendency to rattle. Not so much, if at all, on the later models.....

My 7600 rattles, although I may have cured that with a new o-ring. Just need to reassemble it to find out. Here it is in disassembly:

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]
A new o-ring fixes 760 rattle right up. I've done it.
I sold a 760 BDL for a neighbor to a gent here at the campfire. It had a fore end rattle but it was in the action and not caused by the O ring. Once he got the rifle apart he got it fixed by slightly spreading the action bar assembly back where it attaches to the bolt. The action bars had too much play between them and the receiver.
I have a 760 in 30-06 that I inherited, and a 7600 in 280. I have never shot the 760 yet, but the 280 is boringly accurate with the Hornady 139 BTSP.

Now, on to this other thing...I live in Florida, and every year my state gets invaded, yeah, that's the propoer word...invaded, by boocoo Yankees. And I gotta tell you boys, when I look at these people, how they drive, how they act, the things they do, I just walk away shaking my head and asking myself, how in the hell did we lose the war to these people. grin
'Cause there was more of'em with more guns, more food and more luck.
Originally Posted by jwall
Slidell -

The older the 760s are you will see much more drop in the stock. The later 760s have noticeably less drop.

Jerry


Slidell - there is a new pic posted today on Deer Hunting forum/ pump rifles and deer- p 98 by Whelen Nut. It is a 760
made in 1954. You get a good idea of the drop in the stock.
JFYI.


Jerry
Originally Posted by DELGUE
I have a 760 in 30-06 that I inherited, and a 7600 in 280. I have never shot the 760 yet, but the 280 is boringly accurate with the Hornady 139 BTSP.

Now, on to this other thing...I live in Florida, and every year my state gets invaded, yeah, that's the propoer word...invaded, by boocoo Yankees. And I gotta tell you boys, when I look at these people, how they drive, how they act, the things they do, I just walk away shaking my head and asking myself, how in the hell did we lose the war to these people. grin
I'm not a yankee, I'm a Westerner but even I know the answer to that question. Y'all were to busy fix'n and aim'n to kick their butts,to get the job done!
Originally Posted by moosemike
A new o-ring fixes 760 rattle right up. I've done it.


More on the topic .....


[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
savants = people of profound or extensive learning; a learned scholar

I thought that savant comes after corporal. I'm pretty sure Steelhead was a savant in the coast national guard.
I'm not sure the quality is better on the 7600, though I think it is. I do know for a 100% fact they fit me A LOT better than a 760.

I've had a pile of them both. I've had one that wouldn't shoot that I forgot about. It was a 760 in 300 Savage. I also had a Grice's 7600 35 Rem that had the holes D&T'd out of alignment.
Originally Posted by moosemike
Originally Posted by jwall
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by jwall
Well S H,
we all can't be savants.
Jerry

Only on the 'Fire is the definition of savant being a person with an IQ over 30.

Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by Steelhead

Only on the 'Fire is the definition of savant being a person with an IQ over 30.


See, too stupid to know that no question was asked.
Congrats?

Well, S H,
Who asked what's the definition of savant? You - assumed - and proceeded to give an answer.


You STILL don't have a clue! ! Clueless !!


Jerry


What do you expect from the New Jersey southerner? He needs to rail against Yankees at least once a day everyday to convince himself he's not one. Hence his post. I pity him, he's a small man in so many ways.



In short, you found comfort in the arms of another stupid mother [bleep].

Congrats?
Originally Posted by jwall
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by jwall
Well S H,
we all can't be savants.
Jerry

Only on the 'Fire is the definition of savant being a person with an IQ over 30.

Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by Steelhead

Only on the 'Fire is the definition of savant being a person with an IQ over 30.


See, too stupid to know that no question was asked.
Congrats?

Well, S H,
Who asked what's the definition of savant? You - assumed - and proceeded to give an answer.


You STILL don't have a clue! ! Clueless !!


Jerry



If you're the definition of having a clue I'll hang with ringman.
Originally Posted by moosemike

What do you expect from the New Jersey southerner? He needs to rail against Yankees at least once a day everyday to convince himself he's not one. Hence his post. I pity him, he's a small man in so many ways.



Well since he's NOT smart enuff to leave well enuff alone...

New Jersey---------southerner is a contradiction of terms.

Jerry
Originally Posted by Steelhead

In short, you found comfort in the arms of another stupid mother [bleep].


Well 'Clueless'...... I've been leaving you alone (since you haven't noticed) and you AINT smart enuff to recognize it so.......

S H doesn't stand for savant head.

Can you figure that one either?


Jerry
Get a room Yankees. This is about guns.
© 24hourcampfire