Do you writers ever think someone will come out with a 20 HMR? If not, why? I'd love one with a good Sierra 25-30 grain bullet. 20 calibers have a pretty strong following. Thanks for your thoughts,
Jim D
I just want some f*cking CHEAP 22lr. Is that too much to ask?u
Kaiser Norton
You probably don't want to hear this, but when I was a kid, a box of HPs was about a buck, or roughly 1% of a working stiff's weekly wage. That ratio held up pretty well through my early working years. Now, a box of MiniMags is about $9
for 100 rounds, or $4.50 for 50, for reliable, consistent, accurate ammo. I've been retired for a while and have no idea what a working man makes on average, but I'll bet it's more than $450 a week.
We could do this with gasoline too, going back to when I was making about $120 a week and Sunoco 260 was $.35 a gallon, but math makes my head hurt.
Get an airgun. Decent .22 pellets are about a penny-and-a-half per, and cocking or pumping is good exercise.
Nostalgia time!
I received my first rifle as an under the tree Christmas gift. It was a Remington Nylon 66, I still have it, and it came with a Weaver scope and a red and white carton of 500 Remington Hi-Speed .22 LR 40 grain Kleanbore cartridges. Needless to say, I was as happy as could be and despite the deep snow, I went out to the barn after all of the unwrapping was done, set up a 50' range, and shot about 1/2 of the ammo. I probably would have shot all 500 rounds on Christmas Day, but Christmas fell on a Saturday that year and few stores were open on Sundays, so I couldn't cross the bridge to get to the Aubechon Hardware store in Windsor, VT, until Monday 12/27 at the earliest. At that time, in the mid-1960's, that hi-speed Remington .22 LR ammo was around $0.99 per box of 50 or discounted to $8.99 for a carton of 500. Remington's green and white box standard velocity was about $0.10 per box cheaper, but everybody I knew at that time shot the faster ammo in the field and the slower stuff at the range or in semi-automatic handguns.
Looking back 50 years to 1966, one dollar in 1966 had the buying power of around $7.40 today, so if you pay anything less than $7.40 for a box of .22 LR ammo today, it is actually less expensive than a comparable grade of ammo was 50 years ago.
And, there is a lot more variety today. Back then, I never saw Aguila, Eley, Norma, RWS, or SK brands of rimfire ammo on the shelves. Where I lived in northern New England, it was mostly Remington and Winchester with some Federal and CIL/Dominion and Norma if those cartridges weren't loaded by Rem/Win. The CIL/Dominion ammo that I remember was in 22HP, 6.5x54MS, 32-40, 38-55, and 43 Mauser. The Norma ammo that I remember was all metric for foreign military cartridges or rimmed 7x57 and 8x57 that were mostly intended for use in the rifles that American GIs had "liberated" during/after WW2. Most of my friends' Fathers had served in either WW2 or Korea and almost to a man they had brought home souvenir weapons from their military years, Mausers, Lugers, P-38s, and a variety of combination and drillings from Europe and Arisakas, Nambus, and Samurai Swords from the Pacific.