It's pretty darn good, and of the four spotters I currently have it's the one I plan on keeping. I'll write up something better with pictures tomorrow, but it serves my particular purposes very well.
I wish I had a Leupold 12-40 with TMR here for direct comparison, as that's the spotter this one is clearly copying. Word on the hide is that it compares favorably, but at a sub $500 price point.
I think the rails will be primarily for mounting a rangefinder on the same tripod mount, pointing in the same direction.
On my spotters at work I use the top rail for a LRF/Laser Designator/IR illuminator. I have a T1 red dot also to help get the spotter on target really fast.
What? no camera, Kestrel, or smartphone attached? slacker.....
I can do those things too I guess but usually don't. The DSLR mounts via an adapter to the ocular lense and has its own rail to support both so it isn't just hanging off the eye-piece. It can become a true monster apparatus.
I do wish my Zeiss spotter had some reticle in it, but for the quality of the glass I can't complain and most everything else I"ve got, including L, is pretty dark murky junky looking.
I do wish my Zeiss spotter had some reticle in it, but for the quality of the glass I can't complain and most everything else I"ve got, including L, is pretty dark murky junky looking.
The biggest thing a reticle allows is for the spotter to give on the fly corrections for the next shot without guesswork while eliminating all the BS conversation.