Let's see them boys...specifically Winchester M 70.

How many you want to see?








Pound'R

pre 64 fwt in 280, in a a mcmillan Compact (Edge)


Pushfeed with douglas barrel, 270 winchester.
We covered a lot of miles together!


Factory Winlite (pushfeed), 270 winchester

Nice Pat!

Classic in 6.5x55

Pat,
What does that 280 FW in a Compact weigh? Where is the balance point?

It weighed about 7lb 2 ounces as it sat there. Balance was just behind the front receiver bolt as I recall, it balanced between the hands nicely. I actually did not particularly care for the stock and the barrel (off a classic fwt) was a bit fussy so it went down the road. I have regretted that rash move for a few years now!
In the midst of planning one last possible build(!), again.
It will be on a pre 64 (fwt)action, most likely in a Wildcat fwt stock (should finish about 22-23 ounces), with a fwt or short shanked #1 profiled 270 barrel (quite possibly a std pre 64 barrel recontoured). Same basic recipe that Bob and Rick run and really a clone of my 280 with a different stock.

Thank you. Most helpful. What didn't you like about the compact stock?

I really like that - is that a standard non-edge compact?

The compact could have been fuller in the buttstock for my cheek, I always felt my head was perched up above the stock a bit and if I recall the grip was a little thin for me. The fwt stock actually fits me better and I also like the Bansner stock a lot, though they are a bit heavier.

It's funny that we all post these pictures.....every Compact Edge is exactly the same as every other one.

Every PoundR is the same.....

Every Legend is the same, every Bansner,every Rim Rock, etc etc.

You seen one, you seen them all!

We really live in the age of cooky cutter monolithic rifles. Even the ones we call "custom".

I chuckle to myself when a thread gets started asking which colour of stock looks better! Sounds like a bunch of teenage girls talking!!

Come on now Bob. Here's mine. You know which is the compact and which is the pounder. Both great stocks. However, I think I have a preference for the ergos of the compact. To me, the compact looks better on a rifle with a shorter barrel (22" and less), while the pounder seems better suited for longer barreled rifles (24"+):







Here's a compact that I glass bedded for my buddy. This rifle is a hunting machine..:

It's a Hunters (compact) Edge

Brown pounder M70 375 H&H.

bsa: I know they are great stocks. Just that they are all alike.

Your Compact looks and handles just like mine. Not like the old days when you bought a custom rifle and it was really custom.

I've owned a lot of synthetic stocks and as good as they have been, none have that balance and feel of a top end custom wood stock made by a good stockmaker. The synthetics are kind of generic.

I hear you Bob. I also agree. With that being said, I actually like the feel of my new rifle better than any of my model 70's. It wasn't built by any of the guild guys and the stock was reshaped and refinished by yours truly. The safety is also easier to manipulate for me as well. But that's beside the point...

Laffin.... I guess my point for the OP is that all these stocks (Edge, PoundR, Bansner etc) are separated by at most a few ounces and all of them make up into lithe and lively sporters with a 22-23" barrel and a contour no greater than a #2. They do have slightly different dimensions with the Compact Edge having the most drop at heel; still it handles lightning fast and is comfy to shoot.

Beyond a #2 contour they start to get heavier except in magnum calibers and for myself I never saw the sense in handicapping the handling qualities of a 270/280/30-06/7x57 etc. with a clubby tube, #2 being the absolute max and personally I would never use that weight for anything less than a 7 Rem mag.

I like a 270 to handle more like a grouse gun than a duck gun; the lighter contours will still get it done as far as most have any business shooting at live animals.I've killed with them out to about 500 yards. Theses stocks match nicely with contours no bigger than #2, and I like PoundR's and Compact Edge with "0", #1,or FW contours.

No sense hanging lead slippers on ballerinas.

Hunters Edge.....20" Rock MR 6x47 Lapua

Compact....20" 243

I like them both but prefer the Brown.

I'm with Bob', have to laugh at the guys that try to wear there stocks as a badge of honor.

Great pictures fellas. Dig seeing them all.

SLM: They are just tools....

I have both as well but prefer the Mcmillan Edge, it just fits me better. Just shows how there is no substitute for handling them since others on this thread are the opposite.

I call this one my blue "badge of honor"... Only homo's would think another man considers their stock a "badge of honor".. Just sayin...

I have had a few "one last build's" myself, lol. I'm liking the 1 in 9 twist Benchmark on my new 270 Win if you haven't picked a barrel yet you might consider that one or maybe even better the 1 in 8.5 they now show on their website.

Figured that would trigger your insecurities.

gerrygoat,
My latest 270 had a 1-9 Benchmark. I too would get a 1-8.5 today.
Best barrel I have ever owned. Also have a 1-9.5 Whelen. Both are under half inch rifles.
Better than my Kreiger and Bartlien and Lilja etc.

I'm very happy with it but since I want to shoot 140's or heavier there would have been no downsides to the 8.5 twist. My 35 Whelen is also a Benchmark 1 in 12 that shoots so good it was the reason I got one for the 270 buld. Would strongly consider one like yours were I to build it today.