Home
Posted By: buckykm1 The Drought this year - 12/10/12
With the drought in a lot of the western States this year, did it seem to effect where the Elk were, compared to normal years ?. I didn't see the Elk that i normally do, and just wondered if others had the same problem ?.

Kevin
Posted By: exbiologist Re: The Drought this year - 12/10/12
yes. Some them were lower than normal and staying near more reliable water sources and irrigated ag. Others haven't left the real high country yet
Posted By: mudhen Re: The Drought this year - 12/10/12
Our area that we hunt in Colorado certainly had fewer elk down where we usually find them. All of the elk killed on the ranch that we hunt were killed right at the top. This may have been more due to warmer weather during the first rifle hunt than the drought per se. Many of the ponds lower on the mountain that have been used intensively by elk in the past still had water, but they had almost no elk using them during our hunt.
Posted By: WyoM70 Re: The Drought this year - 12/10/12
In Wyoming where I live, I read that we are on track to have the driest year in the last 110 years. That is serious drought. Foliage was very dried out in elk country, and the ground itself was showing large cracks on high grassy ridges. Streams were low, but still flowing for the most part.

Where I hunted elk this year in western Wyoming (Absorakas)there were several notable differences. One big one was the increased presence of grizzly bears lower down than usual, especially for the time of year (October). More bears, lower than usual, and increased danger for the elk hunters.

One young friend of mine stumbled onto the carcass of a 6x6 bull that I had killed over a week earlier. He and a friend were charged by a large very dark silvertip grizzly, from a distance of about 60 yards. Having bear spray and one rifle, the two men watched the bear go by them at a distance of about 10 yards. Neither bear nor hunters were injured, so no harm, no foul.

Also I ran into a large grizzly late one overcast day. Fortunately the distance was such that I was in no immediate danger, and I was able to back up and get out of the area. It is always a gut check to look around and suddenly see a grizzly ambling your way! grin

Bears in that area are not new, but the increased density of bears was definitely different.

The elk that were there also seemed different. Not so many cows, and maybe not so many elk overall. Definitely fewer large bulls. While we filled our tags, it took longer this year.

I do not know if the elk were hanging higher or had already moved down. Maybe some of both had happened.

But the year was very different from the previous two years. And I have cancelled my trip to Kansas for pheasant hunting due to terrible conditions for birds where I usually hunt.

We could sure use some snow this winter!
Posted By: DR505 Re: The Drought this year - 12/10/12
In New Mexico it is drier than I have ever seen it. The elk were concentrated while looking for the scarce available water...not like in years before when it was more abundant. They looked none too happy.
Posted By: saddlesore Re: The Drought this year - 12/10/12
Where I hunt in rifle season,they were definitely down low. Which was on privatre land in the hay fields at night.
Posted By: Bighorn Re: The Drought this year - 12/10/12
Hunted the first season, on private land- elk were low, near the water and willows, and hay fields- 'moose country'.

A lot of the small creeks and waterholes were dried up.
Posted By: wyoelk Re: The Drought this year - 12/11/12
Same places they always are. Same success as usual. 10-11.
Posted By: taz4570 Re: The Drought this year - 12/11/12
Pretty much a normal elk year for us.
Posted By: Alamosa Re: The Drought this year - 12/14/12
There is a pretty good summary of it in the Nov. issue of Petersen's Hunting.

In the Sangre de Cristos there was poor forage this summer and elk would have to go about a mile further up to find creek water or else visit the ponds on the valley floor. Conditions were slightly better in the Culebra Range but if you brushed against a tree there the needles would just fall off.

Bears invaded many towns. More than 20 bears were put down in Colorado alone.

Rooster hunting is barren this year most places. Better farther north.
Posted By: eyeball Re: The Drought this year - 12/15/12
I would say if a grizzly charged from 60 yards and nothing got hurt, it would be cause I missed and it turned away. What is the protocal, wait till its 10-20 yards to start shooting? crazy
Posted By: superdave Re: The Drought this year - 12/24/12
I hunt BLM and USFS land covered by grazing leases. That's usually not much of a factor. But this year, most open areas were grazed down to the nub. Therefore, we didn't see many elk in their 'normal' areas. Deer too.

FWIW in the last couple weeks, we have been getting snow after snow here in the first 200 miles of the CO river basin. I hope it keeps up, it gives a fella hope.
Posted By: WyoM70 Re: The Drought this year - 01/02/13
Originally Posted by eyeball
I would say if a grizzly charged from 60 yards and nothing got hurt, it would be cause I missed and it turned away. What is the protocal, wait till its 10-20 yards to start shooting? crazy


This is a hard thing to explain exactly. There is no clear cut answer as to where the line should be drawn. It all depends on the situation.

Don't start shooting too soon, but don't wait too long either. You will likely only get one shot. If you shoot too soon, you may miss. If you shoot too late, you may not be able to stop the bear.

In this case that I posted, the bear altered his course from straight on to slightly off that line when the second hunter moved out from behind the first hunter.

Somehow that gave these two men the confidence to hold their fire (one with a gun, one with a can of bear spray) and let the bear pass by them at 10 yards. Neither man had ever been charged by a grizzly before, so they were new at it.

I questioned them extensively, and that was the best that they could say.

I have another friend who killed an incoming grizzly at about 20 yards, and it was almost too late. That bear never deviated from its course as it tracked my friend by his wandering path through the sagebrush coming toward the timber. There was no worn trail involved, just the path chosen by my buddy. That bear started on the trail from over one hundred yards away, and he never slowed down as he came after my friend.

If it ever comes to this, there is only one rule: Do not miss!
Posted By: WapitiBob Re: The Drought this year - 01/02/13
Originally Posted by eyeball
I would say if a grizzly charged from 60 yards and nothing got hurt, it would be cause I missed and it turned away. What is the protocal, wait till its 10-20 yards to start shooting? crazy


no kidding. Guaranteed lead will be in the air before a bear gets to 60 yards.
Posted By: WyoM70 Re: The Drought this year - 01/02/13
Originally Posted by WapitiBob
Originally Posted by eyeball
I would say if a grizzly charged from 60 yards and nothing got hurt, it would be cause I missed and it turned away. What is the protocal, wait till its 10-20 yards to start shooting? crazy


no kidding. Guaranteed lead will be in the air before a bear gets to 60 yards.


Two points to consider:

One, many bear charges will start at closer range than 60 yards. Not all charges are for real, but I don't how to tell which is for real and which is not.

Two, it takes some real guts to hold your fire for a second and see if maybe you can avoid the whole nasty thing. That would be the best possible outcome. The federal investigation that follows is no joke.

I guess there is a possible third point. Don't go elk hunting in grizzly country with your lightweight .243 Winchester, no matter how nice it is to carry up the mountain.
© 24hourcampfire