Home
Posted By: ctw REALLY?? - 09/11/16
http://www.gunbroker.com/item/581160850
Posted By: bsa1917hunter Re: REALLY?? - 09/11/16
Tell us about it..
Posted By: pre64win Re: REALLY?? - 09/11/16
The stock wear does not match the condition of the bluing. Looks like a vintage reblue to me.
Posted By: kaywoodie Re: REALLY?? - 09/11/16
"Looks like a vintage reblue to me."

Hmmm. I thought it was my eyes! I thought same thing.
Posted By: tmitch Re: REALLY?? - 09/11/16
"slight shrinkage due to age"

That's what I been tellin' my wife! shocked

Definite refinish but cool options IF they were original to the rifle.
Posted By: Savage_99 Re: REALLY?? - 09/11/16
It's drilled and tapped for IRONs!

[Linked Image]
Posted By: TheOldTree Re: REALLY?? - 09/12/16
So, they know it is reblued but chose not to mention it?
Posted By: pre64win Re: REALLY?? - 09/12/16
Originally Posted by TheOldTree
So, they know it is reblued but chose not to mention it?

Welcome to Gunbroker. You'd be amazed at the number of "collector" rifles which get listed (and sold) with major/obvious issues not disclosed in the description.

Sometimes it is a crooked seller, but more often I believe it is a result of a seller who is not fully aware of the problems themselves. The sellers frequently are not collectors, but are the unwitting pawn shop employee who has done 10 minutes of research on the internet and concluded they have a rare and collectible rifle on their hands. When this happens, the lister honestly has no idea about things like modifications or rebluing.

Also, there are a lot of people who believe rebluing a rifle makes it more desirable, not less. They can't fathom that a rifle would be worth more in a mottled brown patina than looking brand new with a fresh bluing job.
© 24hourcampfire