#2289407 - 07/03/08 03:15 AM
Rush Limbaugh's pay
|
gahuntertom
Campfire Regular
Registered: 11/13/05
Posts: 1057
Loc: Atlanta
|
Offline
|
|
Talk was never cheap for Rush Limbaugh, but now it is getting a lot more expensive.
The A.M. radio host will be paid about $400 million to continue serving up his daily dose of conservative patter through 2016. His $50 million a year paycheck represents a raise of about $14.4 million a year over his current contract, which was paying him $285 million over eight years and was set to expire in 2009.
The deal — struck a month short of the 20th anniversary of “The Rush Limbaugh Show” — is thought to be the most expensive in radio since Howard Stern moved to Sirius Satellite Radio for a reported $500 million in 2004.
“I’m not retiring until every American agrees with me,” Mr. Limbaugh, 57, said on his radio program Wednesday.
The deal amounts to a major bet by Clear Channel Communications and its syndication subsidiary, Premiere Radio Networks, that Mr. Limbaugh’s brand of conservative talk will prosper well into the next decade. The company announced the contract renewal on Wednesday, though the financial details were supplied by Mr. Limbaugh in an interview with The New York Times Magazine for an article that was posted online at http://www.nytimes.com on Wednesday and will appear in print on Sunday.
Mr. Limbaugh’s windfall comes at an acutely tough time for the radio industry, which has been troubled by technologies like iPods and a sluggish advertising climate. The total time spent listening to radio has fallen 16 percent in the last decade, according to data compiled by Arbitron, the measurement firm.
Advertisers have taken note: Nielsen Monitor-Plus, an advertising information service, measured a 3.6 percent decline in national radio spending last year.
“Frankly, since 2001, we’ve had a number of things going against us,” said Jeff Haley, the chief executive of the Radio Advertising Bureau.
In April, the bureau, a trade group, helped introduce “Radio Heard Here,” a marketing campaign that is meant to reiterate the medium’s relevance and emphasize that it reaches 235 million listeners a week. “Rush represents the reach of radio,” Mr. Haley said.
Certainly, the eight-year contract and large payout for Mr. Limbaugh underscore his position as the leading purveyor of political talk radio. Only a handful of other radio personalities — like Mr. Stern, Paul Harvey, Ryan Seacrest, Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck — have anywhere near the same recognition and power to name their prices.
“Limbaugh is a master of the airwaves,” said Michael Harrison, the editor of the radio industry publication Talkers Magazine, in a telephone interview Wednesday. “He is the best talent on the air in modern broadcasting.”
Mr. Limbaugh’s existing contract, which was worth $285 million over eight years, was set to expire next year. His show — which is on every weekday from noon to 3 p.m. — attracts 3.5 million listeners in an average quarter-hour, and reaches an unparalleled audience of nearly 20 million in an average week, according to Premiere. This makes him the country’s most popular news-talk host by far.
“Broadcasters of Rush’s quality come along once in a lifetime,” John Hogan, the chief executive of Clear Channel Radio, said in a statement on Wednesday. “We’re privileged to continue our relationship which is unprecedented in the history of our industry.”
Mr. Limbaugh is not the only radio star who is busy pumping his franchise. Sean Hannity, the country’s No. 2 host according to Talkers Magazine, is in contract talks with his current syndication company, ABC Radio, as well as Premiere, for a potential three-way deal, according to two sources close to the negotiations. They requested anonymity because the deal had not been signed.
Glenn Beck, another popular host, signed a new contract with Premiere last year that will pay him $10 million a year through 2012.
Mr. Hannity and Mr. Beck each appear on radio while hosting television shows, writing books and staging nationwide tours. Other media personalities, including Oprah Winfrey and Mr. Seacrest, also have radio engagements that feed into their cross-platform brands. But Mr. Limbaugh sticks to his self-proclaimed “golden E.I.B. microphone” — E.I.B., for excellence in broadcasting — and his associated Web site.
In The New York Times Magazine interview, Mr. Limbaugh said the new contract would pay him about $38 million a year for eight years. He also said he would receive a nine-figure signing bonus, and that he earned extra income by selling advertising time on his show and endorsing products. He could not be reached for comment on Wednesday.
“First and foremost I’m a businessman,” Mr. Limbaugh told the magazine. “My first goal is to attract the largest possible audience so I can charge confiscatory ad rates. I happen to have great entertainment skills, but that enables me to sell airtime.”
But Mr. Limbaugh remains a decidedly traditional media celebrity, remaining almost exclusively a radio man. His call-in show is the flagship program of nearly 600 local radio stations. And his brand of staunchly conservative talk, punctuated by bravado and humor, has set the tone for a generation of radio commentators.
The fact that he purposely antagonizes people is part of the draw. Among the more noteworthy examples, in 2006 Mr. Limbaugh made fun of the actor Michael J. Fox, who has Parkinson’s disease, saying that the physical symptoms Mr. Fox had displayed in a political appeal for embryonic stem cell research were “purely an act.”
His success is especially significant given the difficulties of the radio business, which is challenged not only by portable music devices but also by satellite services like Sirius and the growing availability of other entertainment options.
“The terrestrial radio industry must provide the best possible programming or it will not survive in the face of the competition on the Internet and from other new technologies,” said Mr. Harrison of Talkers Magazine.
He added, “The industry has to make sure it has the major league stars in broadcasting; therefore, it makes sense that the most money and the longest contract would go to the biggest star in radio today, and that’s Rush.”
Syndicated talk shows, like Mr. Limbaugh’s, have fared somewhat better than music formats in recent years. When Clear Channel reported a $30 million decline in radio revenue in the first quarter of 2008, it said that the decline was partially offset by syndication and Internet revenues. Charlie Rahilly, the chief executive of Premiere, said that support among sponsors of Mr. Limbaugh’s show was “as strong as it’s ever been.”
Mr. Limbaugh’s new contract was reminiscent of the one that Mr. Stern signed four years ago when he defected from terrestrial radio to Sirius. He is reportedly being paid $100 million each year for five years, though that deal also covered the staff, production and studio costs for “The Howard Stern Show.”
Asked whether Mr. Limbaugh had considered a move to satellite like Mr. Stern, Mr. Rahilly said that it was not discussed. “With 600 affiliates, that’s an unmatched platform that essentially has ubiquity,” he said.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2289419 - 07/03/08 03:58 AM
Re: Rush Limbaugh's pay
[Re: gahuntertom]
|
wildswalker
Campfire Tracker
Registered: 11/26/05
Posts: 5335
Loc: It's My Mountain dammit...
|
Offline
|
|
They wouldn't pay him a nickle if he didn't have an audience.....
_________________________
It was a business decision, don't take it personally. Livin' Life is my business......
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2289422 - 07/03/08 04:05 AM
Re: Rush Limbaugh's pay
[Re: wildswalker]
|
Redneck
Campfire Outfitter
Registered: 01/28/01
Posts: 8094
Loc: TAXHELLWI. USA
|
Offline
|
|
And worth every penny......
_________________________
Target moving date to Belle Fourche, South Dakota: May 1st, 2010, then I'm OUTTA TAX HELL WISCONSIN! NRA Endowment member Ex - USN(SS) (USS Razorback) '66-'69.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2289437 - 07/03/08 04:32 AM
Re: Rush Limbaugh's pay
[Re: Redneck]
|
the_shootist
Campfire Outfitter
Registered: 05/21/03
Posts: 8950
Loc: Canada
|
Online
|
|
My Dad-in-law used to watch him every day on TV. Claimed he was the "holy graille" of staunch republicans. It was a required time of silence when Rush was on.
_________________________
Brother Keith
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2289471 - 07/03/08 05:07 AM
Re: Rush Limbaugh's pay
[Re: the_shootist]
|
Barak
Campfire Outfitter
Registered: 12/27/02
Posts: 8808
Loc: Idaho. Nah, but I can dream.....
|
Offline
|
|
He's a useful barometer of what the Republicans are thinking, and he's certainly not stupid--not as stupid as Sean Hannity, anyway. But it's just as dangerous to listen to him to decide what to think as it is to listen to anybody to decide what to think--more dangerous, perhaps, because he's particularly skilled.
Yes, I know, he claims that the reason he's popular is because he says what people already think, not because he tells them what to think; but that's a careful distortion. He does attract an audience by saying things that audience will agree with; but that's not all he does. He himself calls his show "The Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies," meaning that he intends not only to attract but also to teach.
And even if he does only say what people already think: is that a defense? What if they're wrong? Most people frequently are wrong. (Well, except me, of course.)
I listen to him myself when he's on and I'm in the mood and there's a radio nearby; but it disturbs me to see folks religiously tune him in every day and uncritically suck down whatever he says as though it were gospel truth, the way they might listen to John Hagee or Oral Roberts.
I understand what his critics mean when they say "mind-numbed robots."
For him, I'm happy to see him get scads of money, voluntarily given to him by people who have decided that his services are worth it to them.
For the nation, though, I'm a bit saddened that the particular services he provides are held in such wide and high esteem. Folks could get better information on the Internet for the price of a few strategic Google searches and some time spent reading.
_________________________
"But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain--that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist." --Lysander Spooner, 1867
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2289475 - 07/03/08 05:12 AM
Re: Rush Limbaugh's pay
[Re: Barak]
|
rost495
Campfire Outfitter
Registered: 01/05/05
Posts: 9361
Loc: La Grange, TX
|
Offline
|
|
Free market and all....
But there isn't one sports player worth what they are paid, and no radio voice worth that kind of money just for jabbering. And generally no TV actor worth a dime..
I can agree with a lot of what Rush says.... but I had that opinion long before I listened to pompous.
_________________________
Get as close as you can, but use your skills as required
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2289477 - 07/03/08 05:13 AM
Re: Rush Limbaugh's pay
[Re: Barak]
|
djs
Campfire Guide
Registered: 01/18/06
Posts: 2917
Loc: Virginia
|
Offline
|
|
Nice paycheck! Of course, it is a gift to keep talking about a subject and offering new thoughts every day! He's got it, I don't (won't quit my day job).
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2289483 - 07/03/08 05:20 AM
Re: Rush Limbaugh's pay
[Re: djs]
|
Steve_NO
Campfire Kahuna
Registered: 05/16/03
Posts: 18129
Loc: New Orleans
|
Online
|
|
if he can keep Obamaboy out of the White House, he'll have earned every penny of it
_________________________
Proudly representing oil companies, defense contractors, and firearms manufacturers since 1980. Because merchants of death need lawyers, too.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2289506 - 07/03/08 05:36 AM
Re: Rush Limbaugh's pay
[Re: the_shootist]
|
340mag
Campfire Regular
Registered: 11/12/03
Posts: 1221
|
Offline
|
|
hopefully he and other conservatives , that love this country can sway enought minds to prevent the damn, commiecrat liberal from getting into the white house, and ruining america
Edited by 340mag (07/03/08 05:40 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2289513 - 07/03/08 05:47 AM
Re: Rush Limbaugh's pay
[Re: 340mag]
|
jorgeI
Campfire Guide
Registered: 06/20/03
Posts: 4394
Loc: Orange Park, Florida
|
Offline
|
|
Yeah boy, ain't capitalism & the free market great? :). Tick, tick, tick, wonder when the bitter & green envy crowd will start with the usual insults? (the socialist already showed)
I agree one should not rely on just one source for knowledge, like Ronald Reagan (GOD BLESS HIM) said; "trust but verify", but you know what? haven't been able to prove him wrong on a whole lot over these past 20 years. Look at it this way Komrad Barak, if he was wrong, stupid, or not funny, he'd be broadcasting on air america. No wait, they went out of business.....jorge
_________________________
" In essence, the democratic political platform is socialist, anti-capitalist, pro-abortion, anti-gun and secular, and in my view,and just like Bristoe anti-American."......*ME*
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2289523 - 07/03/08 05:57 AM
Re: Rush Limbaugh's pay
[Re: jorgeI]
|
BobinNH
Campfire Tracker
Registered: 01/28/07
Posts: 5236
|
Offline
|
|
In a day and age when many(especially a lot of younger folks), DON'T think for themselves,are not particularly well-read,and are constantly barraged by a lot of left-wing propaganda from the media, I, for one, am delighted that guys like Rush are in the limelight, and listened to; helps balance things out a bit.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2289653 - 07/03/08 07:22 AM
Re: Rush Limbaugh's pay
[Re: jorgeI]
|
Barak
Campfire Outfitter
Registered: 12/27/02
Posts: 8808
Loc: Idaho. Nah, but I can dream.....
|
Offline
|
|
I agree one should not rely on just one source for knowledge, like Ronald Reagan (GOD BLESS HIM) said; "trust but verify", but you know what? haven't been able to prove him wrong on a whole lot over these past 20 years. Factually wrong isn't so much the issue: emphasis is the issue. Almost all the political discourse in this country is about issues of vanishingly small importance, while the really big, important issues are not discussed at all, because all the major political figures agree with the State's position on them.
For example: is Jeremiah Wright anti-American or not? Remember the media firestorm that created? The answer is easy: who the heck gives a rat's patootie whether he is or not, and why?
Even the question of whether the Democrats or the Republicans will win the Presidency is of no more real import than the question of who will win the Super Bowl--especially this election, when both major candidates are so clearly scraped from the mineral deposits under the scum at the bottom of the garbage can, and when it's so clear that whichever party wins will consider its victory license to scrape even lower next time.
However, nobody of Limbaugh's magnitude, or anywhere near, is seriously questioning whether the US should be part of the United Nations, or whether the Federal Reserve should be abolished, or whether the US should continue to send money, taken under threat of violence from Americans, overseas to vicious dictators and tyrants to keep them in power.
If Limbaugh were seriously interested in liberty, he'd be questioning the fundamental premises of the world's greatest enemy of liberty: the State.
Instead, he questions other people's allegiance to the State when it appears that theirs might not be quite as blind and unquestioning as his own.
Some folks say, well, he can't be too controversial, because the stations that carry him have to get their broadcast licenses from the State. Okay, fine; but the fact that he's willing to use a medium that subjects him to those kinds of constraints demonstrates that he holds certain priorities.
That's all I'm saying. Get all your information from people who all hold the same set of priorities, or, God forbid, from one person, and you're going to wind up with a very narrow view of the world that's easily manipulated by others.
Your priorities should reflect your interests. Since no two people have the same set of interests, no two people should have the same set of priorities. If you adopt the priorities somebody else gives you, then your priorities will reflect his interests, not your own.
_________________________
"But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain--that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist." --Lysander Spooner, 1867
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2289657 - 07/03/08 07:25 AM
Re: Rush Limbaugh's pay
[Re: rost495]
|
JGRaider
Campfire Ranger
Registered: 08/23/05
Posts: 1709
Loc: W. Texas
|
Offline
|
|
Free market and all....
But there isn't one sports player worth what they are paid, and no radio voice worth that kind of money just for jabbering. And generally no TV actor worth a dime..
I can agree with a lot of what Rush says.... but I had that opinion long before I listened to pompous.
Couldn't agree more.
_________________________
Revenge is a dish best served cold.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2289683 - 07/03/08 07:39 AM
Re: Rush Limbaugh's pay
[Re: Barak]
|
Steve_NO
Campfire Kahuna
Registered: 05/16/03
Posts: 18129
Loc: New Orleans
|
Online
|
|
Barak, if you don't think Rush wants the US out of the UN, and vice versa, you obviously don't listen to him.
_________________________
Proudly representing oil companies, defense contractors, and firearms manufacturers since 1980. Because merchants of death need lawyers, too.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2289766 - 07/03/08 08:23 AM
Re: Rush Limbaugh's pay
[Re: Steve_NO]
|
Hammer1
Campfire Regular
Registered: 07/06/03
Posts: 893
Loc: USA
|
Offline
|
|
I'm glad to see a hard-working risk-taking no-quitter determined fellow get ahead.
I hear too many whiners each day tell how they got dealt a raw deal in life. It's likely we all could rationalize the raw deal. But some of us got to get up and go anyway.
Enjoy listening to Rush when I get a chance.
Always enjoyed listening to Reagan too.
The fact that both of them made the liberals mad just adds to the enjoyment.
.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2289773 - 07/03/08 08:27 AM
Re: Rush Limbaugh's pay
[Re: Barak]
|
jorgeI
Campfire Guide
Registered: 06/20/03
Posts: 4394
Loc: Orange Park, Florida
|
Offline
|
|
"For example: is Jeremiah Wright anti-American or not? Remember the media firestorm that created? The answer is easy: who the heck gives a rat's patootie whether he is or not, and why?"
If you don't know (or care) regarding your own quote above, that I find troubling. Of course it's important, because if you are running for any political office, let alone the President of the United States and you associate with a man whose ideas espouse a rabid anti-American bigotry, *I* want to know and it wasn't until he got "caught" by Sean Hannity's research (oh I forgot you think he's an idiot), that he distanced himself. I take it you have no problems with his other "associations"? jorge
Please spare me the Orwellian exaggerations on the state. we're not quite there yet.
_________________________
" In essence, the democratic political platform is socialist, anti-capitalist, pro-abortion, anti-gun and secular, and in my view,and just like Bristoe anti-American."......*ME*
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2289815 - 07/03/08 08:59 AM
Re: Rush Limbaugh's pay
[Re: jorgeI]
|
BMT
Campfire Outfitter
Registered: 11/09/02
Posts: 9162
Loc: Long Tom, Oregon
|
Online
|
|
Jeremiah Wright matters becuase BHO has DONE NOTHING.
All we have to judge him by is his friends.
BMT
_________________________
"The Church can and should help modern society by tirelessly insisting that the work of women in the home be recognized and respected by all in its irreplaceable value." Apostolic Exhortation On The Family, Pope John Paul II
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2289954 - 07/03/08 10:24 AM
Re: Rush Limbaugh's pay
[Re: Steve_NO]
|
Barak
Campfire Outfitter
Registered: 12/27/02
Posts: 8808
Loc: Idaho. Nah, but I can dream.....
|
Offline
|
|
Barak, if you don't think Rush wants the US out of the UN, and vice versa, you obviously don't listen to him. He has the power to make it a major issue, if he wanted--even a campaign issue. But there are other things he's more interested in talking about. That's what I mean by priorities.
_________________________
"But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain--that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist." --Lysander Spooner, 1867
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2289955 - 07/03/08 10:25 AM
Re: Rush Limbaugh's pay
[Re: Hammer1]
|
Barak
Campfire Outfitter
Registered: 12/27/02
Posts: 8808
Loc: Idaho. Nah, but I can dream.....
|
Offline
|
|
I'm glad to see a hard-working risk-taking no-quitter determined fellow get ahead.
I hear too many whiners each day tell how they got dealt a raw deal in life. It's likely we all could rationalize the raw deal. But some of us got to get up and go anyway. Now that's a good point.
+1 to you.
_________________________
"But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain--that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist." --Lysander Spooner, 1867
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2289987 - 07/03/08 10:44 AM
Re: Rush Limbaugh's pay
[Re: jorgeI]
|
Barak
Campfire Outfitter
Registered: 12/27/02
Posts: 8808
Loc: Idaho. Nah, but I can dream.....
|
Offline
|
|
"For example: is Jeremiah Wright anti-American or not? Remember the media firestorm that created? The answer is easy: who the heck gives a rat's patootie whether he is or not, and why?"
If you don't know (or care) regarding your own quote above, that I find troubling. Of course I have my own opinions. It probably can't accurately be said that I don't care, that is, that my concern for the matter is precisely 0.00000000; but Jeremiah Wright is so radically insignificant in the larger picture of the challenges that will face the American people in the near future that the fact that he concerns you is something I find troubling. It means that somebody has succeeded in distracting you from the real issues, and has done it so successfully that you fail to recognize it even when it's pointed out to you.
Of course it's important, because if you are running for any political office, let alone the President of the United States and you associate with a man whose ideas espouse a rabid anti-American bigotry, *I* want to know Because you want to know such things, they should be important to me? Why's that? Do you feel it incumbent upon you to keep up with the romantic meanderings of Britney Spears or Dr. Phil simply because there are people for whom such issues are the most important in their thin, pitiful lives?
and it wasn't until he got "caught" by Sean Hannity's research (oh I forgot you think he's an idiot), that he distanced himself. "Idiot" isn't exactly the proper sobriquet for Sean Hannity. Obviously, idiots don't get (and stay) that rich. "Tool" might be a little better. "Sensationalist neocon shill for the Republican Party" might work. "Content-free combat-radio entertainer." Something like that; but not "idiot."
I take it you have no problems with his other "associations"? Look: I don't give two whoops for the entire election, let alone the campaign, let alone the candidates themselves. The next President of the US is obviously going to be another pantload politician who will make almost everything bad about this country worse and nothing better; and the only difference between the options is exactly what's left out of the "almost."
_________________________
"But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain--that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist." --Lysander Spooner, 1867
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: RickBin, SYSOP
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
18850 Members
65 Forums
196777 Topics
2422365 Posts
Max Online: 1366 @ 08/07/07 07:51 PM
|
|
|