24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,708
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,708
I use R15 in several cartridges and have been very satisfied with it. I am now running out and haven't been able to find any more. Yesterday I was in our LGS and found a good supply of Varget on the shelf. Pricy but available.

I have used the R15 in rounds from the .220 Swift to .338 Win. Mag. Have any of you done comparisons of these two powders and, if so, what were your conclusions?

Normally I don't like switching powders if I do not have to because of the amount of work up involved in finding satisfactory new loads. Any information will be helpful.

Jim

HR IC

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,145
C
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
C
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,145
I tend to use Varget more because it's reported to be more temperature stable. RL15 has been reported to be pretty temperature sensitive in the past but it's been reformulated several times. I don't know how the new stuff handles temp swings.

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,708
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,708
In my case am not worried about temperature stability.

Jim

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,517
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,517
Varget and RL 15 are very similar in both burn speed and velocity results. I find that accuracy does vary, though not always. Example: in 308, Varget produces the best accuracy in my rifle, but in 7mm-08 that honor goes to RL 15. Let your rifle decide.

As for temperature stability, there doesn't seem to be a problem with either powder.


If we live long enough, we all have regrets. But the ones that nag at us the most are the ones in which we know we had a choice.

Doug
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 21,317
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 21,317
They are almost interchageable grain for grain. Certainly close enough that if I'd worked up an accuracy load with RL15, Varget would be my first choice as a replacement powder and odds are you can knock a few grains of your RL15 load, and work up to the load and will likely find it produces the same accuracy and velocity.

IC B2

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,063
H
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
H
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,063
I've never loaded RL15, but I do have sub-MOA loads for most of my calibers using VARGET. I would say you are safe using it in a pinch.


Remember, not everyone has a happy ending, so be happy when you can
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,884
J
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,884
I've used both in 308. I can get 20-25 fps more speed with RL-15. Accuracy is about the same, which means very good. Temperature sensitivity may never be an issue, but I prefer Varget because of it.

It can be 110 here in August when shooting at the range, I've hunted in single digits in December. That can be 150-200 fps difference with some powders. From my reading Varget would probably only see 50 fps or so difference with the same temperature swings. I'm actually more concerned with a safe load developed in the winter being over pressure in August. Temperature sensitivity works both ways.


Most people don't really want the truth.

They just want constant reassurance that what they believe is the truth.
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,966
L
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
L
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,966
While it's slightly faster than Reloder 15 or Varget, overall I've found H4895 to be about as useful as either.

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,539
E
EdM Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
E
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,539
As noted, six of one and a half dozen of another whether velocity or accuracy.


Conduct is the best proof of character.
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 47,727
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 47,727
Originally Posted by 1OntarioJim
I use R15 in several cartridges and have been very satisfied with it. I am now running out and haven't been able to find any more. Yesterday I was in our LGS and found a good supply of Varget on the shelf. Pricy but available.

I have used the R15 in rounds from the .220 Swift to .338 Win. Mag. Have any of you done comparisons of these two powders and, if so, what were your conclusions?

Normally I don't like switching powders if I do not have to because of the amount of work up involved in finding satisfactory new loads. Any information will be helpful.

Jim


I've used both and prefer RL 15....


Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.

BSA MAGA
IC B3

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,211
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,211
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter


I've used both and prefer RL 15....


I've used both and prefer Varget... grin

In my -20F tests I found Varget lost half the velocity that RL15 lost (100 vs 50 fps) and is generally as or more accurate. When I did the test five or six years ago it was enough to cause me to switch when I'd run out of RL15.

However, I'd still chose whichever your rifle liked best, 50 fps be darned...


“Perfection is Achieved Not When There Is Nothing More to Add, But When There Is Nothing Left to Take Away” Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,054
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,054
Have you considered Norma 203B as an alternative to Reloder 15? Just checked and Norma 203B is currently readily available

I have a fair quantity of Reloder 15 as well as a fair quantity of Varget. I've not bothered with comparisons much because whichever I started with based on loading data or suggestions has invariably done well enough. I've got enough H4895 as well.

I've sometimes thought I could stock far fewer powders that share the same applications than I do but it pleases me to have a fair quantity in reserve and confidence that I could find a satisfactory load some place.

Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,761
R
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
R
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,761
Originally Posted by lotech
While it's slightly faster than Reloder 15 or Varget, overall I've found H4895 to be about as useful as either.


Pretty tough to beat old4895

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,705
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,705
Havent used R15 but found H4895 to be more accurate than Varget in a couple of 308s.

Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 75
Q
Campfire Greenhorn
Offline
Campfire Greenhorn
Q
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 75
If you have Varget, RL15 and H4895 it would take care of most reloading needs!

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 347
M
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
M
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 347
I, for one, would definitely be interested in how 203B compares - in real experience, not the charts


vires,fortitudo,vigilantia
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,910
M
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,910
I would bet it's the same powder as RL-15, but have an assignment for magazine that involves shooting various powders to find out how they vary from lot-to-lot, or in various forms over the years, or to find out whether rumors of some powders being the same under different names are true or not.

Among the powders that will be tested are RL-15 and 203B, and I have two different lots of 203B from several years apart to see how they vary as well. Norma admits some of their powders are "very similar" to Alliant powders, but also claims they're more consistent.

Lot-to-lot variation can be considerble. Just look at data for H414 and W760 over the years. They're the same powder and have been for a long time (Hodgdon confirmed as much after they acquired the rights to the "Winchester" powders), but loading data from other companies will differ because of lot variation.


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,054
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,054
203B continues in stock currently at Powder Valley which I think is still the best answer to the OP.

I am reminded of an interesting conversation some years ago on a related subject - definitely NOT RL-15/Norma 203B.

Dealing with two different OEM type vendors with very similar product lines - neither company made everything sold under its own name and actively cross licensed and filled their lines with their competitor's production.

In fact a salesman for company B suggested in some seriousness or at least kidding on the square that we should buy company A's production under the Company B label (where we could) for about the same cost to us.

The rationale was that in this era of statistical process control Company B's deal was for only from the better half of the production so that Company B would not eternally get the inferior half of the production by Company A.

I've long understood going back to Phil Sharpe and others that powder as produced varies and some is sold to consumers as meeting tests for canister grade and some is sold to loading companies as needing and getting adjustments. Mostly first you make the powder then you test it and label it after testing the final product.

I can only interpret statements by Norma that what they sell themselves is the best as their own canister grade is maybe down the middle of the statistical process control or maybe more attention is paid to contaminants or storage condition or something. I doubt the claims are baseless but in a world where leaving the powder exposed to the air for a few day's of lab work changes the result by weight I'd have real trouble designing an experiment to refute the null hypothesis that they are the same. Sadly I'd have real trouble trying to refute the null hypothesis they are different.

I'd expect to punt and say the same but not identical under rigorous testing but that's why the tests. I'll be more interested in the procedure than the result I think.

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,702
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,702
I use and like both. Buy it, you won't regret it.


Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
YB23

Who's Online Now
364 members (007FJ, 06hunter59, 01Foreman400, 10Glocks, 160user, 12344mag, 35 invisible), 2,274 guests, and 947 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,187,731
Posts18,400,859
Members73,822
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 







Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.097s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8803 MB (Peak: 1.0118 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-03-29 11:36:39 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS