24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284
Campfire Kahuna
OP Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284
http://countercurrentnews.com/2016/...poses-list-senators-bed-federal-reserve/

Washington, D.C. – On Tuesday, Senate Democrats were able to block a vote on Sen. Rand Paul’s ‘Audit the Fed’ bill, that would have forced the Federal Reserve into greater transparency and required an audit of the secretive central bank.

The bill received almost unanimous support among Republicans, with votes from Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., and Vermont independent Sen. Bernie Sanders also voting for the measure. Conspicuously absent from the vote was presidential candidate Ted Cruz, who had previously proclaimed his support for the bill — but was too busy campaigning in New Hampshire to make it back to D.C. to actually vote.

Ted Cruz says he is for Auditing the Fed, but when the Senate voted on Rand's bill, Ted was nowhere to be found.

— Ron Paul (@RonPaul) January 12, 2016

The powerful private banking cartel currently controls the monetary policy of the United States, setting interest rates and managing the nation’s money supply with virtually no outside oversight.

The Federal Reserve Bank is made up of 12 different Federal Reserve Banks around the country that are owned by big private banks, with a Board of Governors whose seven members are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate.

The bill would have authorized the General Accounting Office (GAO) to have access to more information as part of an audit and required greater transparency from Federal Reserve monetary policy makers, but fell short of the needed 60 votes for consideration.

Critics of the bill claimed that it would hurt small business and workers, give favor of big banks and Wall Street, while simultaneously politicizing monetary policy.

“We’ll see many members of Congress pushing the Fed to side with the bondholders and Wall Street on combating inflation rather than siding with main street and small businesses and workers in dealing with unemployment,” said Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, who spoke against the bill.

In a Brookings Institution blog post Former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke wrote:

“The principal effect of the bill would be to make meeting-by-meeting monetary policy decisions subject to Congressional review” with more transparency allowing for “political interventions in monetary policy decisions [that] would not lead to better results.”

The problem is that these assertions by Brown and Bernanke are contrary to what the measure would actually work to accomplish.

Former congressman Ron Paul, the original champion of the ‘Audit the Fed’ idea, weighed in on the defeat and expressed his bewilderment at the irrationality behind the oppositions logic.

“I can’t imagine anyone voting against transparency. This whole thing that it would be politicized if Congress has something to say about it — it’s always politicized,” he says, “it’s just who’s behind the scenes doing the politicizing. And that’s what they don’t want to know, because the special interests are the political forces that direct monetary policy,” Ron Paul said.

There have been a number of attempts to audit the Fed since the 2008 economic crisis, with little success. Similar measures were passed by the House in 2012 and 2015, but never made it up for a vote in the Senate.

The GAO has gained a small amount of oversight powers and performed an audit pursuant to the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform act, which revealed the institution had been hijacked by the very bankers it’s supposed to regulate, according to Senator Bernie Sanders.

“Too much of the Fed’s business is conducted in secret, known only to the bankers on its various boards and committees. In 2010, I inserted an amendment in Dodd-Frank to audit the emergency lending by the Federal Reserve during the financial crisis. As a result of this audit, we learned that an institution that was created to serve all Americans had been hijacked by the very bankers it regulates.

We must expand on that first review of the Fed’s activities. Requiring the Government Accountability Office to conduct a full and independent audit of the Fed each and every year, would be an important step towards making the Federal Reserve a more democratic institution that is responsive to the needs of ordinary Americans rather than the billionaires on Wall Street,” Sanders wrote in a statement explaining why he voted for the measure.

Sen. Paul’s measure would have authorized the GAO to review more information as part of an audit, but opponents said that would give lawmakers too much information and power to exercise oversight. The idea that big banks should not have transparency and oversight because it would cause problems is virtually insane.

I wonder if this tax season the government will accept if I tell them that more oversight is actually bad economic policy and they need to allow me to enact my monetary policy without political interference, thus refusing to file taxes.

Below is a list of how each senator voted.

senate-vote

[Linked Image]

GB1

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 18,994
B
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 18,994
Cruz Skipped Crucial Audit the Fed Vote back in January


Leo of the Land of Dyr

NRA FOR LIFE

I MISS SARAH

“In Trump We Trust.” Right????

SOMEBODY please tell TRH that Netanyahu NEVER said "Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away."












Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284
Campfire Kahuna
OP Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284
[Linked Image]


Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40,179
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40,179
Wasn't ron paul that little prick who blamed America for the muslims hitting the twin towers? Sniveling Cowardly POS



Son of a liberal: " What did you do in the War On Terror, Daddy?"

Liberal father: " I fought the Americans, along with all the other liberals."

MOLON LABE





Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 633
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 633
Originally Posted by EthanEdwards
[Linked Image]




You know it..


Texas
IC B2

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284
Campfire Kahuna
OP Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Sniveling Cowardly POS
Describes you to a T.

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,891
O
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
O
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,891
Originally Posted by EthanEdwards
http://countercurrentnews.com/2016/...poses-list-senators-bed-federal-reserve/

Washington, D.C. – On Tuesday, Senate Democrats were able to block a vote on Sen. Rand Paul’s ‘Audit the Fed’ bill, that would have forced the Federal Reserve into greater transparency and required an audit of the secretive central bank.

The bill received almost unanimous support among Republicans, with votes from Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., and Vermont independent Sen. Bernie Sanders also voting for the measure. Conspicuously absent from the vote was presidential candidate Ted Cruz, who had previously proclaimed his support for the bill — but was too busy campaigning in New Hampshire to make it back to D.C. to actually vote.

Ted Cruz says he is for Auditing the Fed, but when the Senate voted on Rand's bill, Ted was nowhere to be found.

— Ron Paul (@RonPaul) January 12, 2016

The powerful private banking cartel currently controls the monetary policy of the United States, setting interest rates and managing the nation’s money supply with virtually no outside oversight.

The Federal Reserve Bank is made up of 12 different Federal Reserve Banks around the country that are owned by big private banks, with a Board of Governors whose seven members are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate.

The bill would have authorized the General Accounting Office (GAO) to have access to more information as part of an audit and required greater transparency from Federal Reserve monetary policy makers, but fell short of the needed 60 votes for consideration.

Critics of the bill claimed that it would hurt small business and workers, give favor of big banks and Wall Street, while simultaneously politicizing monetary policy.

“We’ll see many members of Congress pushing the Fed to side with the bondholders and Wall Street on combating inflation rather than siding with main street and small businesses and workers in dealing with unemployment,” said Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, who spoke against the bill.

In a Brookings Institution blog post Former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke wrote:

“The principal effect of the bill would be to make meeting-by-meeting monetary policy decisions subject to Congressional review” with more transparency allowing for “political interventions in monetary policy decisions [that] would not lead to better results.”

The problem is that these assertions by Brown and Bernanke are contrary to what the measure would actually work to accomplish.

Former congressman Ron Paul, the original champion of the ‘Audit the Fed’ idea, weighed in on the defeat and expressed his bewilderment at the irrationality behind the oppositions logic.

“I can’t imagine anyone voting against transparency. This whole thing that it would be politicized if Congress has something to say about it — it’s always politicized,” he says, “it’s just who’s behind the scenes doing the politicizing. And that’s what they don’t want to know, because the special interests are the political forces that direct monetary policy,” Ron Paul said.

There have been a number of attempts to audit the Fed since the 2008 economic crisis, with little success. Similar measures were passed by the House in 2012 and 2015, but never made it up for a vote in the Senate.

The GAO has gained a small amount of oversight powers and performed an audit pursuant to the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform act, which revealed the institution had been hijacked by the very bankers it’s supposed to regulate, according to Senator Bernie Sanders.

“Too much of the Fed’s business is conducted in secret, known only to the bankers on its various boards and committees. In 2010, I inserted an amendment in Dodd-Frank to audit the emergency lending by the Federal Reserve during the financial crisis. As a result of this audit, we learned that an institution that was created to serve all Americans had been hijacked by the very bankers it regulates.

We must expand on that first review of the Fed’s activities. Requiring the Government Accountability Office to conduct a full and independent audit of the Fed each and every year, would be an important step towards making the Federal Reserve a more democratic institution that is responsive to the needs of ordinary Americans rather than the billionaires on Wall Street,” Sanders wrote in a statement explaining why he voted for the measure.

Sen. Paul’s measure would have authorized the GAO to review more information as part of an audit, but opponents said that would give lawmakers too much information and power to exercise oversight. The idea that big banks should not have transparency and oversight because it would cause problems is virtually insane.

I wonder if this tax season the government will accept if I tell them that more oversight is actually bad economic policy and they need to allow me to enact my monetary policy without political interference, thus refusing to file taxes.

Below is a list of how each senator voted.

senate-vote

[Linked Image]


It is easy to point out that it was mathematically impossible to get 60 votes. Had the votes been there he would not have missed it.


One man with courage makes a majority....

~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 634
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 634
Originally Posted by okie


It is easy to point out that it was mathematically impossible to get 60 votes. Had the votes been there he would not have missed it.


It is mathematically impossible for him to win the primary but he still finds the time to show up for that.

Last edited by Chris_EOD; 04/30/16.
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 18,243
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 18,243
Originally Posted by Chris_EOD
Originally Posted by okie


It is easy to point out that it was mathematically impossible to get 60 votes. Had the votes been there he would not have missed it.


It is mathematically impossible for him to win the primary but he still finds the time to show up for that.


smirk

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 38,842
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 38,842
Originally Posted by Chris_EOD
Originally Posted by okie


It is easy to point out that it was mathematically impossible to get 60 votes. Had the votes been there he would not have missed it.


It is mathematically impossible for him to win the primary but he still finds the time to show up for that.


Exactly this.

Course he's also fine with ignoring the will of the people - he's just here to "stop Trump"

IIRC wasn't he also down on the border a few years ago passing out games and soccer balls to illegals?


Me



IC B3

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,891
O
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
O
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,891
Originally Posted by Chris_EOD
Originally Posted by okie


It is easy to point out that it was mathematically impossible to get 60 votes. Had the votes been there he would not have missed it.


It is mathematically impossible for him to win the primary but he still finds the time to show up for that.


And he should show up for that. Reagan was the underdog in '76 behind Ford and it went all the way to the convention and history shows it was the right thing to do. I do not think he is going to make it either BUT the hand needs to be played out for the future. Four or more years from now things could be very different for Cruz as a presidential candidate as it was for Reagan.....History tends to repeat itself.


One man with courage makes a majority....

~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 18,994
B
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 18,994
Originally Posted by okie
Originally Posted by Chris_EOD
Originally Posted by okie


It is easy to point out that it was mathematically impossible to get 60 votes. Had the votes been there he would not have missed it.


It is mathematically impossible for him to win the primary but he still finds the time to show up for that.


And he should show up for that. Reagan was the underdog in '76 behind Ford and it went all the way to the convention and history shows it was the right thing to do. I do not think he is going to make it either BUT the hand needs to be played out for the future. Four or more years from now things could be very different for Cruz as a presidential candidate as it was for Reagan.....History tends to repeat itself.


Leo of the Land of Dyr

NRA FOR LIFE

I MISS SARAH

“In Trump We Trust.” Right????

SOMEBODY please tell TRH that Netanyahu NEVER said "Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away."












Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,439
F
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
F
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,439
Reagan was only around 50 delegates behind Ford, and won 24 states to Ford's 26.

History ain't repeatin itself.

The Cruzer has no honor.

Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 634
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 634
Originally Posted by okie
Originally Posted by Chris_EOD
Originally Posted by okie


It is easy to point out that it was mathematically impossible to get 60 votes. Had the votes been there he would not have missed it.


It is mathematically impossible for him to win the primary but he still finds the time to show up for that.


And he should show up for that. Reagan was the underdog in '76 behind Ford and it went all the way to the convention and history shows it was the right thing to do. I do not think he is going to make it either BUT the hand needs to be played out for the future. Four or more years from now things could be very different for Cruz as a presidential candidate as it was for Reagan.....History tends to repeat itself.


Kasich is the underdog, I guess that is why he is staying in as well. Just like Reagan.

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,891
O
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
O
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,891
Originally Posted by Fubarski
Reagan was only around 50 delegates behind Ford, and won 24 states to Ford's 26.

History ain't repeatin itself.




I predict that Cruz will throw his support behind the nominee just like Reagan did Ford THAT is the history I am speaking of and it needs to happen again.

The part that doesn't need to repeat itself?

Losing in November...

It's high time to stop throwing rocks at OUR candidates and focus on the REAL enemy....The Socialists...


One man with courage makes a majority....

~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,827
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,827
Chris_EOD,

Quote
It is mathematically impossible for him to win the primary but he still finds the time to show up for that.


There is no second ballot in the senate. There is in the convention.


"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation."
Everyday Hunter
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 634
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 634
Originally Posted by Ringman




There is no second ballot in the senate. There is in the convention.


His job is his seat in the Senate. Just another thing on list of why I won't vote for his reelection.



Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

355 members (10gaugemag, 260Remguy, 17CalFan, 264mag, 270winchester, 10gaugeman, 28 invisible), 2,492 guests, and 1,189 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,190,598
Posts18,454,430
Members73,908
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.078s Queries: 15 (0.006s) Memory: 0.8873 MB (Peak: 1.0409 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-19 04:30:01 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS