Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Scientist run Calculations that Prove . . . God

Because the Higgs Field didn't exist yet. Perhaps her words were in-artful, but they are not inconsistent with current models of the theoretical very early Universe.

Here's a little bit of Sunday morning pot stirring for the Campfire.


[url=http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/756870/proof-of-god-kurt-godel][/url]


Scientists use mathematical calculations to PROVE the existence of God
SCIENTISTS have ‘confirmed’ the existence of God after proving a mathematician’s theory which suggests that there is a higher power.
By Sean Martin
PUBLISHED: 03:00, Sun, Jan 22, 2017 | UPDATED: 09:03, Sun, Jan 22, 2017





Two computer scientists say they proved that there is a holy supreme force after confirming the equations.

In 1978, mathematician Kurt Gödel died and left behind a long and complex theory based on modal logic.

Dr Gödel’s model uses mathematical equations that are extremely complicated, but the essence is that no greater power than God can be conceived, and if he or she is believed as a concept then he or she can exist in reality.


Scientists claim to have proof of God

Mathmatician Kurt Gödel established the equation

Renowned physicist finds PROOF of God

Or as Dr Gödel put it through his equations: “Ax. 1. {P(φ)∧◻∀x[φ(x)→ψ(x)]} →P(ψ)Ax. 2.P(¬φ)↔¬P(φ)Th. 1.P(φ)→◊∃x[φ(x)]Df. 1.G(x)⟺∀φ[P(φ)→φ(x)]Ax. 3.P(G)Th. 2.◊∃xG(x)Df. 2.φ ess x⟺φ(x)∧∀ψ{ψ(x)→◻∀y[φ(y)→ψ(y)]}Ax. 4.P(φ)→◻P(φ)Th. 3.G(x)→G ess xDf. 3.E(x)⟺∀φ[φ ess x→◻∃yφ(y)]Ax. 5.P(E)Th. 4.◻∃xG(x)”.

You get it, right?



But two computer scientists have used computers to run such complicated which they say confirms that the equation does indeed add up.

The point of the researchers’ argument was that they were not directly trying to prove the existence of God, but rather to showcase the power of computers.

Christoph Benzmüller of Berlin's Free University, who ran the calculations along with Bruno Woltzenlogel Paleo of the Technical University in Vienna, told Spiegel Online: "It's totally amazing that from this argument led by Gödel, all this stuff can be proven automatically in a few seconds or even less on a standard notebook.

“I didn’t know it would create such a huge public interest but [Gödel’s ontological proof] was definitely a better example than something inaccessible in mathematics or artificial intelligence…

While Karl Popper's falsifiability criterion demarcates the limits of scientific inquiry, those who strive for certainty remain at the mercy of fantasy and logical fallacy.

Couldn't you have just said that they are wankers?

Fixed it for you.

While Scientists keep finding smaller and smaller particles in the Universe, if only in theory in many cases, there must always be something other than the individual particles...... something which keeps them separate.

Something which is " Not this nor that".

Which happens to be the definition for God by the early Church Fathers.

While Karl Popper's falsifiability criterion demarcates the limits of scientific inquiry, those who strive for certainty remain at the mercy of fantasy and logical fallacy.

Wouldn't be the same sort of dills that came up with climate change would it.

Looks like you might be bird dogging around Asymptotic Pantheism?

Nope.... just noting the similarity between Particle Theory and the thinking of early Christians;" This is not Thou, neither art Thou this."

Pantheism is an attribute of God, but not God.

Except the part where main stream Bible Scholars no longer accept The Exodus as a historical event, nor Moses as a historical character....