Originally Posted by steve4102
Quote
Soon after Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein suggested using a wiretap to record President Trump’s communications, then-acting FBI director Andrew McCabe went to the bureau’s top lawyer seeking advice on what he had just heard.

Rosenstein, McCabe told the lawyer, wanted to furtively record the president to help explore whether Trump had obstructed justice. How, McCabe asked, should the FBI respond to the outlandish proposition?


McCabe was at the top of the Coup/Insurance Plan to remove President Trump from office.

Why would he go to Baker for advice and describe [RR] plan as "outlandish" when just about everything McCabe and the FBI had done to Trump in the past couple months/years were even more Outlandish? McCabe is already involved in an illegal wiretap of Donald J Trump, what's so outlandish about recording him in person?

Something about that McCabe/Baker meeting doesn't smell right.



This^^^. There is some double crossing going on. Lisa and McCabe both may have flipped. They may have been told to set the stage for RR to resign to later testify against H or Zero.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out.


Ecc 10:2
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.

A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.

"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".

I Dindo Nuffin