Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Originally Posted by goalie
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by goalie
Actually read this "oh no, .gov is pissed at us" non-retraction retraction:

the data showed no reinfection, but .gov says get jabbed and we want reimbursement, so.....


It seems likely to me that they were bullied.


Now, let's ask the question: should we trust ANYTHING coming from the government health care machine if they are willing to "bully" one of the world's most prestigious health care providers into "recommending" what their own data days is an unnecessary treatment?

Add in that the treatment in question is new tech, potentially dangerous, in an EUA status in addition to being shown conclusively to be unnecessary.



Question:
Are you an employee of that government healthcare machine?



One last bump for goalie.


The degree of my privacy is no business of yours.

What we've learned from history is that we haven't learned from it.