Since Georgia law allowed citizens arrest which allows citizens to detane law breakers. Then the false imprisonment is canceled out
.
That's not what Georgia law says, it's quite a bit more restrictive than what you stated, as far as who can make a citizen's arrest and for what.
It was also the centerpiece of the defense and as such would have been explained to the jury in detail multiple times by people infinitely more qualified on Georgia law (including the judge) than anyone here.
A jury of their peers heard those explanations of Georgia law, heard the evidence, and didn't buy that they acted in accordance with Georgia law.
What else does anyone need?
Are you saying jury's get it right 100% of the time and there is no room to debate their verdict?
