Bullschit, to the inth-degree.
Incredibly poorly researched, and biased from the get-go.
Try reading some of Stephen Halbrook's work on the 2A. Legal scholarship that blows that hatchet job out of the water; vetted and peer-reviewed.
Further, that "article" is from 1998. See exactly what the SCOTUS thought, or rather, didn't think of it in
Heller and
McDonald.
That drivel from UC-Davis, written by Carl T. Bogus (such an appropriate name) isn't worth wiping your ass with. Bogus has made a career of trying to rewrite the Constitution to his socialist, anti-2A agenda for years.
He has failed, miserably, many times over on trying to sue the firearms industry under... convoluted... tort law claims, serving only to pad his own socialist reputation and add to his CV for his positions at Roger Williams School of Law in Rhode Island.
His work is, quite literally, laughable.
http://law.rwu.edu/carl-t-bogus
