|
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 974
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 974 |
What do you guys think of Mountainsmith? This pack seems comfortable and durable, but that's just from trying it out at the store with some weight. Do they make quality gear? If anyone is familiar with this pack, would it be up to the rigors of backcountry hunting and potentially even hauling game? I'm kind of sick of external frame packs and I'm ready to move on.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,969
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,969 |
I like to look at the critical elements. That pack weighs 6# and has a volume of 5,800 cu. in. An Osprey Aether, and many other quality packs of the same volume, will weigh only 4#.
KC
Wind in my hair, Sun on my face, I gazed at the wide open spaces, And I was at home.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,581
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,581 |
A pack that fits right and weighs a bit more is WAY better than one that doesn't fit right and weighs less. I the MS fits you, it will likely do everything you need it to. I use a Jandd Mountaineering pack and rarely wish for something else.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,058
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,058 |
For that price and weight range I'd be searching forums for a used Dana.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 860
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 860 |
Mountainsmith makes pretty good stuff, plus have a lifetime warranty. I've got a 0* synthetic fill mummy bag from them, no complaints.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,258
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,258 |
I looked over MS's website pretty carefully and couldn't find any information/diagrams on their frame system. Any Co. that doesn't offer that info is not one I'd be interested in. OTOH, the pack looks pretty good, and I certainly like a lot of what I see there. I'd just need more info than they're providing.
Most all these Co's have "dumbed-down" their pack lines, removing the ability to bend/customize stays to the individual's back. A lot of our backs don't fit in this new fit's-all approach. These sort of packs are really hybrid internal/externals. That would include the entire Osprey line.
“Perfection is Achieved Not When There Is Nothing More to Add, But When There Is Nothing Left to Take Away” Antoine de Saint-Exupery
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 998
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 998 |
I have an old fanny pack of theirs from the Patrick Smith ownership era and have looked at the current model, no comparison. As the saying goes, "they aint what they used to be".
Experience is what you get, when you don't get what you want!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 410
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 410 |
Haven't had one personally, but the MS gear that I've run across is definitely marginal. The photos of that pack belt and suspension look along the lines of a Lowe Alpine I had about 10 years ago, which is to say; not good.
In that price range I would be looking for something used. Maybe an older Gregory or ArcTeryx, these may not be in your size, but it shows whats out there.
For example, the Gregory Whitney is a fantastic pack: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Gregory-Whitney-95-Humboldt-Green-Medium-Backpacking-Hiking-Backpacks-/112276639056?hash=item1a24358d50:g:5-MAAOSwNnRYgmTH
Or my personal favorite, the ARcTeryx Bora 95: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Arcteryx-Bora-95-Backpack-Hiking-Expedition-Water-Repellent-Size-S-/122315206038?hash=item1c7a8ded96:g:6xcAAOSwUKxYftQi
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,795
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,795 |
I'd feel comfortable snatching up a used one from when Patrick ran it. I got a 90's frostfire I keep as a loaner, must be ~6000 or so ci, it's a killer pack. My partner packed 130# for 9 miles with it couple years ago.
Sean
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 13,232
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 13,232 |
Don't have a pack of their's but my favorite duffel is a MS and that thing is built heavy duty. Not the lightest but built to last.
Let's Go Brandon! FJB
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,414
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,414 |
I have a mouuntainsmith daypack from the late 80s and it almost as good as new...love that pack, very good quality from that era.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,180
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,180 |
I remember them as being fairly low end at least compared to what was out there for back packing packs when I was working as a climbing guide. Osprey, Dana Designs and Gregory pretty much ran the show.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 1
New Member
|
New Member
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 1 |
I've used Mountainsmith packs for years. I think sometimes people mistake cost and value for cheap quality. I used to live right next to their headquarters (how I got to know the brand) and have known Patrick and the crew now for years and can say Patrick is on board with the current lineup. Stitch for stitch their packs are as good as any, they just don't have the same same fit range found in other packs. If it fits you I'd say go for it. The other great thing about them is their service. I was hiking the AT and needed some replacement pole parts and they shipped them to my next stop, no questions asked. They've got a lifetime warranty and they really stick to it.
|
|
|
|
590 members (1lessdog, 2500HD, 1minute, 204guy, 17CalFan, 10Glocks, 63 invisible),
2,071
guests, and
1,146
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,190,748
Posts18,457,795
Members73,909
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|