I recently purchased this rifle at an auction and have been researching its background 1267063 NM 03 19 26 DCM RIFLE SALES 1922-42 H J RICHARDSON,MISSOULA MT
So its a National Match M1903 purchased by this gentleman in 1926 he was later in a Match at Camp Perry in 1938 I'm assuming the same gun was used. I would love to be able to identifiy the Smith that made it. Any ideas and all comments are welcome and appreciated
Style is similar to Winslow Arms I think from Florida. Google them to compare.
"When you disarm the people, you commence to offend them and show that you distrust them either through cowardice or lack of confidence, and both of these opinions generate hatred." Niccolo Machiavelli
That rifle looks definitely post WW II. It may have been customized then. It would not have been legal to shoot in the matches at Camp Perry in the condition shown in the photos. Or very effective either.
Don't blame me. I voted for Trump.
Democrats would burn this country to the ground, if they could rule over the ashes.
That is not a Winslow Arms product. More likely it was done by some obscure gunsmith. The stockwork is no different (or any more notable) than thousands of similar '03 sporters built back in the 50's and 60's.
If it were my gun, I'd be looking to restock the thing with something more appropriate to it's history, but that's just me.
I have seen and handled rifles by Winslow Arms, they were a much higher quality than your rifle. Besides the hundreds of obscure gunsmiths doing conversions of military rifles there were also many rifles like this produced as student projects by the various gunsmithing schools. For that matter gun owners could buy semi-inlet stocks from many manufacturers and create their own sporter. Most of the gunsmithing school guns were not checkered as this was a class apart from stockmaking, the lack of checkering would make me suspect the rifle was a student project. There not being any marking on the wood or metal, the origin is anyone's guess.
That is not a Winslow Arms product. More likely it was done by some obscure gunsmith. The stockwork is no different (or any more notable) than thousands of similar '03 sporters built back in the 50's and 60's.
If it were my gun, I'd be looking to restock the thing with something more appropriate to it's history, but that's just me.
I would absolutely restore it if the first 2 inches of the barrel hadn't been cut off!!! Not sure what to do with it??
That is not a Winslow Arms product. More likely it was done by some obscure gunsmith. The stockwork is no different (or any more notable) than thousands of similar '03 sporters built back in the 50's and 60's.
If it were my gun, I'd be looking to restock the thing with something more appropriate to it's history, but that's just me.
I would absolutely restore it if the first 2 inches of the barrel hadn't been cut off!!! Not sure what to do with it??
What were your thoughts when you bid and won?
Those old guns generally shoot pretty well.
Sorta heavy for today's tastes, but solid, good guns, made out of steel.
That looks like the OEM Springfield trigger. If so, a Timney would probably help.
That is not a Winslow Arms product. More likely it was done by some obscure gunsmith. The stockwork is no different (or any more notable) than thousands of similar '03 sporters built back in the 50's and 60's.
If it were my gun, I'd be looking to restock the thing with something more appropriate to it's history, but that's just me.
I would absolutely restore it if the first 2 inches of the barrel hadn't been cut off!!! Not sure what to do with it??
What were your thoughts when you bid and won? .......ALRIGHT!! I won
Those old guns generally shoot pretty well. .........Its sub MOA at 100 yards no problem
Sorta heavy for today's tastes, but solid, good guns, made out of steel.
That looks like the OEM Springfield trigger. If so, a Timney would probably help. its by far the most amazing trigger I have ever felt
That is not a Winslow Arms product. More likely it was done by some obscure gunsmith. The stockwork is no different (or any more notable) than thousands of similar '03 sporters built back in the 50's and 60's.
If it were my gun, I'd be looking to restock the thing with something more appropriate to it's history, but that's just me.
I would absolutely restore it if the first 2 inches of the barrel hadn't been cut off!!! Not sure what to do with it??
Too bad. I'd still restock it, in the classic style. There's little collector value at this point, although that NM shroud/safety/cocking piece assembly is fairly scarce, and worth a few $$. If you're thinking about installing a different safety (like a side-swing), I'd find some standard components to use.
its the Springfield National Match trigger what was done to it I don't know but it is smooth as silk and feather touch to fire . 1/2 MOA at 100 yards is not hard at all but I guess that's what you get with a National Match rifle I wrote to CMP to try to get the scores from the 1938 camp perry match and see if they list individual scores for the Montana team so Ill see what they dig up. As soon as I get the paperwork from CMP I will put it up for sale there has to be somebody that needs a National Match deer rifle!
DF, in all fairness, Biesen did build some (very few) early stocks with inlays. But this isn't one of them.
Thanks PrimeBeef that was what first caught my eye as I had seen a couple of his with inlays. As I said that was the first thing that came to mind. Thanks for your support. Cheer NC
don't judge until you have walked a mile in other persons' moccasins' SUM QUOD SUM........HOMINEM TE ESSE MEMENTO